Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Safety and complexity: the inter-departmental threats to patient safety in the operating department

By Justin Waring, Ruth McDonald and Stephen Harrison


Purpose: Current thinking about ‘patient safety’ emphasises the causal relationship between the work environment and the delivery of clinical care. This research draws on the theory of Normal Accidents to extend this analysis and better understand the ‘organisational factors’ that threaten safety.\ud Methods: Ethnographic research methods were used, with observations of the operating department setting for 18 month and interviews with 80 members of hospital staff. The setting for the study was the Operating Department of a large teaching hospital in the North-West of England.\ud Results: The work of the operating department is determined by inter-dependant, ‘tightly coupled’ organisational relationships between hospital departments based upon the timely exchange of information, services and resources required for the delivery of care. Failures within these processes, manifest as ‘breakdowns’ within inter-departmental relationships lead to situations of constraint, rapid change and uncertainty in the work of the operating department that require staff to break with established routines and work with increased time and emotional pressures. This means that staff focus on working quickly, as opposed to working safely.\ud Conclusion: Analysis of safety needs to move beyond a focus on the immediate work environment and individual practice, to consider the more complex and deeply structured organisational systems of hospital activity. For departmental managers the scope for service planning to control for safety may be limited as the structured ‘real world’ situation of service delivery is shaped by inter-department and organisational factors that are perhaps beyond the scope of departmental management

Publisher: Emerald
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). A practical guide to risk management in surgery; developing and planning”, Health Care Risk Resource, London: Royal College of Surgeons Symposium.
  2. (2001). Adverse events in British hospitals: a preliminary retrospective review”, doi
  3. (2000). An Organisation with a Memory, doi
  4. (2003). Behavioural markers of surgical excellence”, doi
  5. (2001). Complex science – complexity, leadership and management in healthcare organisations”,
  6. (1997). Complexity, tight-coupling and reliability: Connecting Normal Accident Theory and High-Reliability Theory”,
  7. (2002). Complications in surgical patients”,
  8. (1993). Defining ‘High-reliability’ organisations in practice: A Taxonomic Prologue”,
  9. (1999). Error in doi
  10. (1995). Ethnography: principles in practice, doi
  11. (1998). Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine”, doi
  12. (2000). Human error – models and management”,
  13. (1999). Human Factors approach in medicine”,
  14. (1978). Man-made disasters,
  15. (1997). Managing the risks of organisational accidents,
  16. (1974). Mental procedures in real-life tasks: a case study of electronic troubleshooting”,
  17. (2001). Organisational failures in urgent and emergency surgery: a potential peri-operative risk factor”,
  18. (2005). Patients’ safety”.
  19. (2003). Safety Agency, doi
  20. (2003). Scientific Management,
  21. (2000). Surgical error”, doi
  22. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA, Chicago: doi
  23. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory, doi
  24. (2005). The ethnographic contribution to patient safety research”,
  25. (1993). The Study of errors and accidents
  26. (1975). Training for Uncertainty”,
  27. (2004). World Health Organisation doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.