Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Emerging Gender Regimes and Policies for Gender Equality in a Wider Europe

By Gillian Pascall and Jane Lewis

Abstract

This article addresses some implications for gender equality and gender policy at European and national levels of transformations in family, economy and polity, which challenge gender regimes across Europe. Women’s labour market participation in the west and the collapse\ud of communism in the east have undermined the systems and assumptions of western male breadwinner and dual worker models of central and eastern Europe. Political reworking of the work/welfare relationship into active welfare has individualised responsibility. Individualisation\ud is a key trend west − and in some respects east − and challenges the structures that supported care in state and family. The links that joined men to women, cash to care, incomes to carers have all been fractured. The article will argue that care work and unpaid care workers are\ud both casualties of these developments. Social, political and economic changes have not been matched by the development of new gender models at the national level. And while EU\ud gender policy has been admired as the most innovative aspect of its social policy, gender equality is far from achieved: women’s incomes across Europe are well below men’s; policies for supporting unpaid care work have developed modestly compared with labour market activation policies.Enlargement brings new challenges as it draws together gender regimes with contrasting histories and trajectories. The article will map social policies for gender equality across the key\ud elements of gender regimes – paid work, care work, income, time and voice – and discuss the nature of a model of gender equality that would bring gender equality across these. It\ud analyses ideas about a dual earner–dual carer model, in the Dutch combination scenario and ‘universal caregiver’ models, at household and civil society levels. These offer a starting point for a model in which paid and unpaid work are equally valued and equally shared between men\ud and women, but we argue that a citizenship model, in which paid and unpaid work obligations are underpinned by social rights, is more likely to achieve gender equality

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk:797
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002a), ‘Central and East European states respond to socio-demographic challenges’,
  2. (2001). A decade of transition’,
  3. (2001). A new welfare architecture for Europe’, Report Submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European
  4. (2000). Actual and Preferred Working Hours in the EU: National Background for France, Dublin: European Foundation for Living and Working Conditions.
  5. (2002). Care as a good for social policy’, doi
  6. (2001). Care work: innovations in the Netherlands’,
  7. (2001). Care Work: The Quest for Security, Geneva: International Labour Office. doi
  8. (1999). Cash for child-care and daddy leave’,
  9. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives,
  10. (2002). Combining work and care in the polder model: an assessment of the Dutch part-time strategy’, doi
  11. (1998). Democracy and representation: or why should it matter who our representatives are?’,
  12. (2000). Directorate-General for Information and Public Relations (D-G)
  13. (1998). Education for All? The Monee Project’, Regional Monitoring doi
  14. (1999). Employment inEurope: Trends andProspects,
  15. (1991). Engendering Democracy, doi
  16. (1998). Equal opportunities for women in the European Union: success or failure?’,
  17. (2001). Europe at a crossroads: harmonization, liberalization, and the gender of work time’,
  18. (2003). Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment,
  19. (2002). Family policies and gender
  20. (2002). Family Policy, Life-Cycle and Linking Working Life and Family Life in France: Factors, New Choices to be Made,
  21. (1996). Family Support Policies in Central and
  22. (2000). From equal pay to equal employability: four decades of European gender policies’,
  23. (2001). From private carer to public actor: the carers’ movement in England’,
  24. (2000). Gender and Citizenship, Cambridge: doi
  25. (2000). Gender and social policy: comparing welfare states in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union’,
  26. (1995). Gender and the evolution of European social policies’,
  27. (2002). Gender and welfare state change’,
  28. (2000). Gender Policies in the European Union, doi
  29. (2000). Gender, flexibility, and new employment relations in the European Union’,
  30. (2002). Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life,
  31. (2002). Ideology and choice between work and care: Swedish family policy for working parents’, doi
  32. (2001). In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care’, doi
  33. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences, doi
  34. (1997). Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, New York and London: Routledge. emerging gender regimes and policies 393 Gershuny,
  35. (2002). Making Men into Fathers, Cambridge:
  36. (2002). Man Enough for the Job? A Study of Parliamentary Candidates, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
  37. (2002). Meeting the Child Poverty Challenge: why Universal Childcare is Key to Ending Child Poverty, London: Daycare Trust.
  38. (2001). More or Less Work? Gender, Employment and Working-time Preferences in Europe’, Report for the European Foundation on Living and Working Conditions, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions,
  39. (1998). National working-time regimes and equal opportunities’, doi
  40. (1999). Parental leave in Europe: policy implications’,
  41. (1999). Parental leave in Sweden’,
  42. (2002). Policy discourses on “reconciling work and life”
  43. (1998). Public Economics in Action: The Basic Income/Flat Tax Proposal,
  44. (1999). Reconciliation of work and family life for men and women and the quality of care services’,
  45. (2002). Social Europe East and West’,
  46. (2000). Social policy agenda’, Communication from the Commission to the Council,
  47. (2002). Social security in Hungary: a balance sheet after twelve years’,
  48. (2002). Spheres of care in the UK: separate and unequal’,
  49. (2000). Stumbling Towards Basic Income, London: Citizens Income Study Centre.
  50. (1990). The “woman question” in the age of Perestroika’,
  51. (2002). The care crunch: changing work, families and welfare in
  52. (1989). The CommonGood: Citizenship, Morality and Self-Interest ,
  53. (2001). The decline of the male breadwinner model: the implications for work and care’,
  54. (2001). The End of Marriage: Individualism and Intimate Relations?,
  55. (1998). The European Union and women’s rights: from the Europeanization of national agendas to a European agenda?’,
  56. (1999). The European Union’s policy on the equality of women’, doi
  57. The French 35 hour working law and the work-life balance of parents: friends or foes?’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Work, life and time in the new economy’, London School of Economics,
  58. (2001). The Gender Pay Gap: A Research Review, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
  59. (1999). The new regulatory state: the social powers of the European Union’, doi
  60. The problem of fathers: policy and behaviour
  61. (1999). The rise and decline of the “male breadwinner family” in Britain’, doi
  62. (1989). The Second Shift ,
  63. The Social Situation in the European Union 2000, Luxembourg: European Commission.
  64. (2001). The Welfare State as Piggy Bank,
  65. (1990). The Workings of the Household, Cambridge: Polity Press. 394 gillian pascall and jane
  66. (2001). TheUKat the Crossroads: Towards an Early Years European Partnership, London: Daycare Trust.
  67. (2001). Time, money and the gender order: work orientations and working time preference
  68. (1999). Towards an equal division of paid and unpaid work: the case of the Netherlands’, doi
  69. (2002). Transformations of fatherhood’,
  70. (2002). WhyWeNeed aNewWelfare State,
  71. (1998). Women and social transformation in Central-Eastern Europe: the “old left” and the “new right”’,
  72. (2001). Women in Parliament: A Comparative Analysis, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
  73. (1999). Women in transition’,
  74. (2000). Women’s Incomes over the Lifetime, London: The Stationery Office.
  75. (2003). Women’s Issues Worldwide: Europe, Connecticut and London:
  76. (2001). Work and welfare: towards a post-productivist welfare regime’,
  77. (2003). Working Conditions in the Acceding and Candidate Countries, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
  78. (2001). Working Time Developments − Annual Update
  79. (2002). Working Time Preferences in Sixteen European Countries, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
  80. Yearbook 2001: The Statistical Guide to Europe, Data 1989−1999, Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.