Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Conceptualising and Effecting Good Outcomes in Foster Care:an exploration of the research literature

By Kate Wilson, Ian Sinclair, C. Taylor, A. Pithouse and C. Sellick

Abstract

On any one day over 75,000 children are looked after by local authorities in the UK. Numerically the most important form of provision for these looked after children is foster care. This caters for about 60% of those looked after at any one point in time. This review is about its outcomes. \ud \ud The Oxford English Dictionary gives one meaning of outcome as 'a visible or practical product, effect or result'. This definition emphasises causality and efficacy. So we are primarily concerned with outcomes which foster care can bring about: changes that are desired (or not) and that would not have occurred without it. That said, it is often difficult to know whether these changes should be seen as the effects of foster care or would have occurred in any case. In what follows we first describe what happens to foster children. We then turn to the more complicated question of how far what happens can be seen as an effect of foster care itself.\ud \ud Against this background we consider five broad issues.\ud \ud • Methodology – how do we decide whether an apparent outcome is in fact produced by foster care and not simply a state that follows it?\ud • The background to outcome research in foster care. What are the basic characteristics of fostered children? Why are they fostered? How do they do? What is foster care meant to do for them? Against what criteria should its outcomes be assessed?\ud • The overall impact of foster care. Judged against these criteria do children on average do ‘better’ if they are fostered than would have been the case if they were not?\ud • Differences within foster care. Given that a child is fostered what makes a difference to whether he or she has a good or less good outcome?\ud • Implications. In the light of this evidence what might be done by way of organisation, training and so on to ensure that the outcomes of foster care are as good as possible

Publisher: Policy Press
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk:820
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). 10-year-old offenders to be sent to foster homes.’
  2. (1971). A comparative study of adopted children, foster children and children in their biological environment born after undesired pregnancies.
  3. (2001). A comparison of foster parents who quit consider quitting and plan to continue fostering.’ Social Services Review, doi
  4. (1994). A Comparison of Kinship Foster Homes and Foster Homes: Implications for Kinship Foster Care as Family Preservation.’
  5. (1982). A follow-up study of foster children in permanent placements.’ Social Services Review
  6. (1997). A framework for development of intensive out of home support services.
  7. (2001). A Life more ordinary: what children want from foster placements.’
  8. (2001). A Literature Review Comparing the Outcomes of Residential Group Care and Therapeutic Foster Care’.
  9. (1997). A model of the determinants of expenditure on children’s personal social services.
  10. (2000). A Study of the Placement of Looked After Children in Wales – Commissioned by SSI Wales. Cardiff:School of Social Sciences,
  11. (2001). A very private practice: an investigation into private fostering.
  12. (1999). Abuse of children in foster and residential care.’
  13. (2001). Adjusting to a foster family’.
  14. (1990). Adopted and illegitimate children grown up.’ In
  15. (1988). Adoption and Disruption: Rates, risks and responses.
  16. (1999). Adoption Now: Messages from Research.
  17. (1996). Adult functioning of children who live in kin versus non-relative foster care.’
  18. (1997). Adult outcome of children cared for longterm periods in foster families.’
  19. (1994). After care: the education and occupation of children who have been in care.’
  20. (2001). Allegations against foster carers: An in-depth study.’ Child Abuse Review, doi
  21. (1996). Allegations against foster families: Agency procedures and practices.’ Foster care,
  22. (1995). Allegations against foster families: Carers’ expectations and experiences.’
  23. (1987). Analyzing Abuse in Foster Family Care.
  24. and Utting W (2001)Better results for children and families.
  25. (1989). Annotation: Outcomes in Long-term Foster Family Care.’ doi
  26. (2002). Approaches to Needs Assessment in Children’s Services. doi
  27. (1997). Are we helping foster care youth prepare for their future?’In
  28. (2001). Assessing and Promoting Quality in Kin and Nonkin Foster Care.’ Social Service Review, doi
  29. (2000). Assessing children’s experiences of out-of-home care: methodological challenges and opportunities.’Social Service Review,
  30. (2002). Assessing the Effect of Family-Centred Out –of-Home Care on Reunification Outcomes.’
  31. (1996). Assessing the long-term effects of foster care. Washington DC: Child Welfare League of America.
  32. (2001). Australia: The Transformation of the Wage-Earners’ Welfare State.’ In
  33. (2000). Behavior problems, Academic Skill Delays and School Failure Among School-Aged Children in Foster Care: Their Relationship to Placement Characteristics.’
  34. (1993). Behavioral problems of children in kinship care.’
  35. (2001). Caretakers of children with HIV in extended and foster families: the French situation.’
  36. (1985). Catch-up growth following abuse.’
  37. (1998). Characteristics and outcomes of drug-exposed and non-drug-exposed children in kinship care and non-relative foster care.’
  38. (1999). Child Advocacy Services in Wales: A Review, A report commissioned by SSI Wales. Cardiff: School of Social Sciences:
  39. (1987). Child Care and Adult Crime. Manchester:
  40. (1993). Child Care in the European Community: a country-specific guide to foster and residential care.
  41. (1989). Child Care Now: A survey of placement patterns.
  42. (1998). Children and Social Welfare in Europe.
  43. (1997). Children and young people’s participation in reviews.’
  44. (2000). Children and youth in foster care: disentangling the relationship between problem behaviours and number of placements.’
  45. (1957). Children in care and the recruitment of foster parents. London: Home Office.
  46. (1996). Children in Europe. chapter 15. London: NCH Action for Children. doi
  47. (1978). Children in Foster Homes: Achieving Continuity of Care.
  48. (1996). Children in long-term foster care: emotional and social development.
  49. (2000). Children in Substitute Care: Some Conceptual Considerations and doi
  50. (2002). Children Looked After in the Year to 31
  51. (2002). Children placed with relatives or family study’, unpublished study,
  52. (2001). Children Who Return Home From Foster Care: A
  53. (1998). Children’s Homes Revisited.
  54. (2003). Choice Protects Update bulletin. www.doh.gov.uk/choice protects
  55. (1997). cited in
  56. (2002). Client satisfaction Methods: Input from Parents with Children in
  57. (1998). Comparison of two community alternatives to incarceration for chronic juvenile offenders.’
  58. (2002). Competitive tendering and out-of-home care for children:
  59. (2003). Consultation Paper: Improving Placement Choice and Stability for Children and Young People Looked After – Strategic Framework.
  60. (1997). Contact between Children Placed away from Home and their
  61. (1999). Contact Between Children Placed Away from Home and their Birth Parents: A Reanalysis of the Evidence doi
  62. (1998). Contact: the social worker’s experience.’
  63. (2000). Delivering Foster Care.
  64. (1997). Developing leaving care services: tapping the potential of foster carers.’
  65. (1995). Development after Physical Abuse in Early Childhood.
  66. (1988). Dimensions of substitute care: a comparative study of foster and residential care practice.
  67. (2000). Disabled Children and Residential Schools: A Survey of Local Authority Policy
  68. (2003). Effectiveness of childminding registration and its implications for private fostering. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  69. (1975). Effects of early institutional rearing on the behaviour problems and affectional relationships of four-year-old children.’
  70. (1998). Ethical issues in qualitative methodology with children.’
  71. (1998). Evaluation of Family Preservation and Reunification Outcomes.’ http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/fampres94/chapter1.htm
  72. (2002). Evaluation of the Forward Steps Project: A Case Study, funded by Children in Wales.
  73. (1995). Factors which influence the educational attachment of children in foster care.’ Community Alternatives:
  74. (1994). Failure to escape: a longitudinal study of foster children’s educational attainment.’
  75. (2002). Family Placement Services.’ In
  76. (1988). Family visiting in out-of-home care: A guide to practice. Washington DC: Child Welfare League of America.
  77. (1994). Family-based services for families and children at risk of out-of-home placement.’
  78. (2000). Foster care breakdown: a study of a special teenager fostering scheme.’
  79. (1990). Foster care children in life course perspective.
  80. (1985). Foster care for child maltreatment: impact on delinquent behaviour.’ Pediatrics 75:562-568. Rushton, A (in press) The adoption of looked after children: a scoping review of research. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  81. (1982). Foster care in retrospect.’ Tulane:
  82. (1989). Foster care outcomes: A review of key research findings’.
  83. (1997). Foster care: a research review. London: The Stationery Office.
  84. (1995). Foster Care: Theory and Practice.
  85. (2002). Foster Children’s behavioural disturbance and detachment from caregivers and community institutions.’
  86. (1987). Foster Home Breakdown.
  87. (1993). Fostering as seen by the carers’ children’.
  88. (1997). Fostering children and young people with learning disabilities: the perspectives of birth children and carers’.
  89. (2000). Fostering Family Contact. London: The Stationery Office.
  90. (1998). Fostering Good Relations: a Study of Foster Care and Foster Carers in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Research Unit.
  91. (1997). Fostering in Wales: The All Wales Review’, Adoption and Fostering,
  92. (2001). Friends and Family: Scoping paper prepared for the Department of Health. Available on www.qualityprotects.doh.gov.uk/familycarerscoping.pdf Iglehart, A
  93. (2000). from a UK based study of late permanent placements.’ doi
  94. (1998). From Care to Accommodation-Support, Protection and Control in Child Care Services. London: the Stationery Office.
  95. (2000). From Placement to Prison: The Path to Adolescent Incarceration from Child Welfare Supervised Foster or Group Care.’ Children and Youth Services Review,
  96. (1997). Global Social Policy: International organisations and the future of welfare.
  97. (1998). Going Missing: Young People Absent From Care.
  98. (2000). Growing up in foster care. doi
  99. (2001). Guidance on the Education of Children Looked After by Local Authorities. Circular 2/2001,
  100. (1984). Hard to Place.
  101. (2000). Having Someone Who Cares? Barriers to Change in the Social Care of Children.’
  102. (2001). Health (2001a) Children looked after by local authorities, year ending 31
  103. (2000). Health (2001b) Outcome Indicators for Looked After Children:
  104. (2002). Health (2002a) Children Looked After by Local Authorities,
  105. (2002). Health (2002b) Care Leavers, Year ending 31
  106. Health (2002c) Children adopted from care
  107. Health (2002d) Health Minister announces major review of fostering and placement services.
  108. (1995). How children view their own and their foster families: a research study.’
  109. (1999). How foster carers view contact’
  110. (1994). Implications of research on the welfare of children under permanency planning’. In:
  111. (1994). Improving adjustment outcomes for foster children with emotional and behavioural disorders: early findings from a controlled study on individualised services.’
  112. (1986). In and out of care: the experience of children, parents and social workers.
  113. (1986). In Care: A study of social work decision making.
  114. (2002). Independent fostering agencies uncovered: the findings of a national study.’ doi
  115. (2001). Influences on the Decision to Become or not to Become a Foster Parent.’ Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services,
  116. (2000). Institutional care: risk from family background or pattern of rearing?’ doi
  117. (1983). Intervention in child abuse:
  118. (2000). Investing in children’s futures: enhancing the educational arrangements of lookedafter children.’
  119. (2000). Keeping Foster Children Connected to Their Biological Parents: The Impact of Foster Parent Training and Support.’ Child and Adolescent Social Work
  120. (2002). Key Factors That Influence the Educational Experience and Achievement of Children Looked After: A Case Study of Young People Placed in Residential and Foster Care in South Wales. Wales Office of Research and Development funded study,
  121. (2001). Kin and Non-Kin Foster Care- Findings from a National Survey.’ Children and Youth Services Review 24,1/2,
  122. (2002). Kinship care versus stranger foster care: how do they compare?’
  123. (2002). Kinship Care: Issues
  124. (1996). Language comprehension and expression among adolescents who have experienced childhood physical abuse.’
  125. (2003). Late foster placements- a second chance for stability and educational success, ’45-50. in Stability in Foster Care, papers prepared for seminar,
  126. (1999). Learning How to Make Children Safer: An Analysis for the Welsh Office of Serious Child Abuse Cases in Wales. Centre for Research on the Child and Family,
  127. (1986). Leaving Care.
  128. (1986). Legacies of loss: visions of gain. An inside look at adoption disruption. Maine:University of South Maine.
  129. (2003). Local Authority Performance Management Statistics:
  130. (1994). Long term fostering and the Children Act: A Study of Foster Parents who went on to Adopt.
  131. (1992). Long-term consequences of foster care for adult well-being. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln, USA,:University of Nebraska.
  132. (2000). Long-term foster care or adoption? The evidence examined.’
  133. (1984). Long-Term Foster Care. doi
  134. (1995). Looked after children: Research into Practice.
  135. (2000). Looking After Children: Assessing Outcomes in Child Care – Strategy for Revisions, (February)
  136. (2000). Lost in Care: Report of the Tribunal of Inquiry into the abuse of children in care in the former county council areas of Gwynedd and Clwyd since 1974. HC 21,
  137. (1986). Lost in care: The problems of maintaining links between children in care and their families.
  138. (2001). Love and money: payment and the fostering task.’
  139. (1994). Maintaining attachment relationships among children in foster care.’ Families in Society:
  140. (1995). Moving on. Young people and leaving care schemes.
  141. (2000). Multi-dimensional treatment foster care: A program for intensive parenting, family support and skill building.’
  142. National Assembly for Wales (1999a) New Arrangements for Young People Living in and Leaving Care. (July)
  143. National Assembly for Wales (1999b) Adoption: Achieving the Right Balance (December)
  144. (1993). Not Just a Name- The Views of Young People in Foster and Residential Care. London: National Consumer Council.
  145. (2002). Obstacles to involving children and young people in foster care research’.
  146. (2003). One Problem among many: drug use among care leavers in transition to independent living. (Home Office Research Study 260). London: Home Office.
  147. (1997). Only -–not for circulation 43 Blome, W
  148. (1994). Only -–not for circulation 44 Create foundation (2000) Consultation and Participation Models for Children and Young People in Care.www.create.net.au//create_world/ctw_html/pubs.html Cummins,
  149. (1998). Only -–not for circulation 45
  150. (2003). Only -–not for circulation 46
  151. (1990). Only -–not for circulation 47 Lyon, C
  152. (2003). Only -–not for circulation 48
  153. (1998). Only -–not for circulation 49
  154. (1998). Only -–not for circulation 50 Shaw, C
  155. (1991). Only -–not for circulation 51
  156. (2000). Only -–not for circulation 52
  157. (2002). Outcomes for Young Adults Who Expereinced Foster Care.’
  158. (2003). Overview and Survey of Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Stability and Continuity of Care for Looked After Children, (National Assembly for Wales sponsored project)
  159. (1988). Parenting breakdown: The making and breaking of intergenerational links.
  160. (2003). Part of the family: pathways through foster care. doi
  161. (2000). Partnership reviewed: words of caution,
  162. (2000). Performance indicators for Child Welfare Services in California Project’.http://cssr.berkely.edu, Center for Social Services Research.
  163. (2001). Performance Targets and Stability of Placements for Children Long Looked After Away from Home.’ doi
  164. (2001). Permanency in Kinship Care: An Exploration
  165. (2000). Permanent Family Placement for Children of Minority Ethnic Origin.
  166. (1991). Permanent Family Placement: A Decade of Experience.
  167. (1999). Placement Choices for Children in Temporary Foster Care.
  168. (1991). Placement outcomes for children with special needs.
  169. (1995). Practice in permanency planning for family continuity.’
  170. (1996). Predisposition to Criminality: Swedish adoption studies in retrospect.’ In
  171. (2000). Promoting resilience.
  172. (2002). Promoting stability and continuity in care away from home,’ 37-58. In
  173. (2000). Psychiatric Morbidity among Young Offenders in England and
  174. (1998). Quality Protects: Framework for Action. London: Department of Health.
  175. (2000). Relative care: a different type of foster care- implications for practice.’ 193-213. In Kelly,
  176. (1998). Remember my messages…The Experiences and Views of 2,000 children in Public Care in the UK. London: Who Cares? TrustChamberlain, P
  177. (1995). Report of the Children Act Research Group.Cardiff:School of Social Sciences,
  178. (1994). Residential and foster
  179. (1999). Resilience concepts and findings: implications for family therapy.’ doi
  180. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity.’ doi
  181. (2003). Respect and Responsibility: Taking a stand against anti-social behaviour (Cm. 5778). Norwich: The Stationery Office.
  182. (2003). Review of Innovative Fostering Practice. Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  183. (2002). Risk factors in maltreated youth placed in foster care: a longitudinal study of protective and vulnerability factors.’ Child abuse and neglect,
  184. (2000). Safe care, abuse and allegations of abuse in foster care.’
  185. (1998). School achievement and adult qualifications among adoptees: a longitudinal study.’
  186. (1976). School attainment of children who have been in care.’ Child Care,
  187. (2001). Second time round: a survey of grandparents raising their grandchildren. ‘Adoption and fostering,
  188. (1996). Seen but not heard? Addressing the needs of children who foster.’
  189. (1999). Setting new national standards for foster care.’
  190. (1998). Sexually Abused and Abusing Children in Substitute Care.
  191. (2000). Sharing the care: the qualities sought of social workers by foster carers.’
  192. (1999). Sibling separation and contact in permanent family placement,’ 28-82. In Mullender, A (ed) We are family: sibling relationships in placement and beyond.
  193. (1994). Signposts: Findings from a National Inspection of Private Fostering.
  194. (1995). Social Services Inspectorate
  195. (2002). Social Services Statistics,
  196. (1995). Social Work and Assessment with Adolescents.
  197. (2003). Social Work and Looked After Children’
  198. (1996). Standards in Leaving Care.
  199. (1998). Still Missing? The experiences of disabled children and young people living away from their families. Volume 1. London: Who Cares?
  200. (2001). Strategies for survival: users’ experience of child welfare in three welfare regimes.’
  201. (2000). Support Care: a new role for foster carers.’ In Wheal, A (ed) Working with parents: learning from other people's experiences. Lyme Regis:Russell
  202. (1999). Supporting Families Through Short-term Fostering. London: The Stationery Office. All Wales Review of Local Authority Fostering Services, Commissioned by the Welsh Office Social Services Inspectorate. Cardiff: School of Social and Administrative Studies,
  203. (1998). Surviving the care system: education and resilience.’
  204. (1997). Teachers’ assessments of children in foster care.’
  205. (2000). Tell Them so they Listen: Messages from Young People in Custody, (Home Office Research Study 201), London: Home Office.
  206. (2002). Testing the Limits of Foster Care: Fostering as an alternative to secure accommodation. doi
  207. (1987). The ability and behaviour of children who have been “in care” or separated from their parents.’ Early development and care, 28, Special Issue.
  208. (1999). The abuse of children in public care.’
  209. (2000). The Adult Well-being of Individuals Reared in Family Foster Care Placements.’ Child and Youth Care Forum,
  210. (2002). The aims and principles of independent fostering agencies: a view from the inside.’
  211. (1988). The biological children of foster parents in the foster family.’
  212. (1999). The Children First Programme in Wales: Transforming Children’s Services. Circular
  213. (1988). The consequence of child abuse.’
  214. (1995). The educational needs of abused and neglected children: a review of the literature.’ Early Child Development and Care,
  215. (2001). The effect of foster carer training on the emotional and behavioural functioning of looked-after children.’
  216. (1999). The efficacy of family reunification practices: Reentry rates and correlates of reentry for abused and neglected children reunited with their families.’ Child Abuse and Neglect,
  217. (1995). The emotional and behavioural adjustment of United States adopted adolescents doi
  218. (1998). The essential aspects of mediation in child protection cases.’
  219. (2001). The Fostering Task with Adolescents. Report to the Department of Health.
  220. (2000). The importance of listening to the child in foster care,’ 40-58. In Kelly,
  221. (2002). The importance of sibling relationships for maltreated children in foster care.’ Dissertation abstract ,California:
  222. (1999). The International Perspective of Foster Care.’ In Wheal A
  223. (2000). The Long-Term Correlates of Family Foster
  224. (2003). The Mental Health of Young People Looked After by Local Authorities. London: The Stationery Office.
  225. (2001). The Myth of Egalitarianism’. In
  226. (1997). The organisation of fostering services.
  227. (2001). The placement of looked after children in Wales – a ‘top down’ perspective’ Adoption and Fostering,
  228. (1999). The placement of sexually abused and abusing siblings,’ 213-226. In Mullender, A (ed) We are family.
  229. (1983). The prediction of successful foster placement.’
  230. (2002). The R U Being Heard Project: a Report on services in the statutory and voluntary sector for listening and responding to children and young people in Kingston upon Hull.
  231. (2002). The Relationship between Care and Criminal Careers, Unpublished PhD thesis,
  232. (1996). The Report of the Examination Team on Child Care Procedures and Practice in North Wales.
  233. (1996). The reported health and functioning of children maltreated while in family foster care.’
  234. (1990). The supply of foster families for children in care.’
  235. (2001). The United Kingdom: Rolling back the Welfare State?’ In
  236. (2002). The unknown fostering: A study of private fostering. Lyme Regis:
  237. (1998). The use of focus groups in exploring children’s experiences of life in care.’
  238. (2002). The Welfare of Children with Mentally Ill Parents: Learning from Inter-Country Comparisons.
  239. (1997). The World of Foster Care: An International Sourcebook on Foster Family Care Systems.
  240. (2001). Three decades of child maltreatment research: implications for the infant and primary school years.’
  241. (1994). Time to listen: The experiences of young people in foster and residential care. London: ChildLine. Mullender, A (ed) We are family: sibling relationships in placement and beyond.
  242. (1997). Time to listen: views and experiences of family placement. Report no 36. Portsmouth:
  243. (1973). Trading in children: A study of private fostering. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  244. (2003). Training foster carers in a preventative approach to children who challenge – mixed messages from research.’ Adoption and Fostering (forthcoming,
  245. (2002). Training foster carers in challenging behaviour: a case study in disappointment.’
  246. (2001). Transition to adulthood for vulnerable youths: a review of research and implications for policy’. Social Service Review,
  247. (1997). Transitions to adulthood: A child welfare perspective.’ Community alternatives-
  248. (1999). Trends in Foster Care and Adoption.’
  249. (1991). Trials and tribulations: Returning children from local authority care to their families.
  250. (1994). Types and frequency of child maltreatment by family foster care providers in an urban population.’
  251. (1991). Using a specialized foster care community treatment model for children and adolescents leaving a state mental hospital.’
  252. (1977). Variations in behaviour ratings of children who have been in care.’
  253. (1994). We live here too: birth children’s perspectives on fostering someone with learning disabilities’.
  254. (2000). West African children in private foster care
  255. (2003). What happens to foster children? Report Three.
  256. (1996). What works in family placement? Ilford: Barnados.
  257. (1986). Who needs care? Social-work decisions about children.
  258. (1998). Why foster parents continue and cease to foster.’ doi
  259. (1998). Young People Leaving Care.
  260. (1995). Young people’s views on being looked after in out-of-home care under the Children Act

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.