Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Efficient option pricing with transaction costs

By Michael Monoyios

Abstract

A fast numerical algorithm is developed to price European options with proportional transaction costs using the utility-maximization framework of Davis (1997). This approach allows option prices to be computed by solving the investor’s basic portfolio selection problem without insertion of the option payoff into the terminal value function. The properties of the value function can then be used to drastically reduce the number of operations needed to locate the boundaries of the no-transaction region, which leads to very efficient option valuation. The optimization problem is solved numerically for the case of exponential utility, and comparisons with approximately replicating strategies reveal tight bounds for option prices even as transaction costs become large. The computational technique involves a discrete-time Markov chain approximation to a continuous-time singular stochastic optimal control problem. A general definition of an option hedging strategy in this framework is developed. This involves calculating the perturbation to the optimal portfolio strategy when an option trade is executed

Topics: Partial differential equations, Probability theory and stochastic processes, Calculus of variations and optimal control
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:233/core69

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A closed-form solution to the problem of superreplication under transaction costs.
  2. (1991). A general equilibrium analysis of option and stock market interactions.
  3. (1994). A note on super-replicating strategies.
  4. (1994). A problem of singular stochastic control with discretionary stopping.
  5. (1997). An asymptotic analysis of an optimal hedging model for option pricing with transaction costs. doi
  6. (1999). Bounds on prices of contingent claims in an intertemporal economy with proportional transaction costs and general preferences.
  7. (1999). Coherent measures of risk.
  8. (1992). Derivative asset pricing with transaction costs.
  9. (1994). Dynamic hedging portfolios for derivative securities in the presence of large transaction costs.
  10. (1998). Edgeworth binomial trees. doi
  11. (1993). European option pricing with transaction costs.
  12. (1996). Hedging and portfolio optimization under transaction costs: a martingale approach.
  13. (2001). Hedging derivative securities and incomplete markets: An -arbitrage approach.
  14. (1998). Local risk-minimization under transaction costs.
  15. (1990). Numerical methods for stochastic control problems in continuous time.
  16. (1997). Numerical methods for stochastic control problems in finance. In
  17. (1991). Numerical methods for stochastic singular control problems.
  18. (1999). On dynamic measures of risk.
  19. (1997). On the possibility of hedging options in the presence of transaction costs.
  20. (1996). On the pricing of contingent claims under constraints.
  21. (2000). On the pricing of contingent claims with frictions.
  22. (1997). Optimal delta-hedging under transactions costs.
  23. (1989). Optimal replication of contingent claims under transaction costs.
  24. (1985). Option pricing and replication with transactions costs.
  25. (2000). Option pricing in discrete-time incomplete market models. doi
  26. (1997). Option pricing in incomplete markets. In
  27. (1992). Option replication in discrete time with transaction costs.
  28. (1997). Options pricing and hedging in discrete time with transaction costs. In
  29. (2000). Portfolio optimization and martingale measures.
  30. (1990). Portfolio selection with transaction costs.
  31. (2000). Pricing via utility maximization and entropy. doi
  32. (2003). t S y yRS q q q q q q
  33. (2000). The minimal entropy martingale measure and the valuation problem in incomplete markets.
  34. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.
  35. (1995). There is no nontrivial hedging portfolio for option pricing with transaction costs.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.