Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The mortgage interest deduction and its impact on homeownership decisions

By Christian A. L. Hilber and Tracy M. Turner

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the combined U.S. state and federal mortgage interest deduction (MID) on homeownership attainment, using data from 1984 to 2007 and exploiting variation in the subsidy across states, over time and due to inter-state moves. We test whether capitalization of the MID into house prices offsets the positive effect on homeownership. We find that the MID only boosts homeownership attainment of higher income households in less tightly regulated housing markets. In more restrictive places – typically larger coastal cities – an adverse effect exists. The MID is an ineffective policy to promote homeownership and improve social welfare

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, HG Finance
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:31759
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1992). A General Equilibrium Model of Housing, Taxes, doi
  2. (1993). An Introduction to the TAXSIM doi
  3. (2009). Exits from Homeownership: The Effects of Race, Ethnicity and Income.” doi
  4. (1999). Giving Households Credit: How Changes doi
  5. (2005). Homeownership, community interactions, and segregation.” doi
  6. (2001). Homevoters, municipal corporate governance, and the benefit view of the property tax.” doi
  7. (1979). Housing Decisions and the U.S. doi
  8. (1985). Housing Purchases and Transitory Income: doi
  9. (1984). Housing Tenure, doi
  10. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens?” doi
  11. (1980). Inflation, Income Taxes, and Owner-Occupied Housing.” NBER working paper no. 553, doi
  12. (2008). Job creation and housing construction: Constraints on metropolitan area employment growth.” doi
  13. (2010). New Housing Supply and the Dilution of Social Capital.” doi
  14. (2006). of Revenue (2009) Minnesota State Tax Rankings. Tax Rankings.
  15. (1999). Panel Study of Income Dynamics Analysis Weights for Sample Families and Individuals. Panel Study of Income Dynamics Documentation.
  16. (2005). Regulation and the High Cost of Housing doi
  17. (2008). Tax Deductions, Tax Credits and the Homeownership Rate of Young Urban Adults in the United States.” Urban Studies, doi
  18. (2008). Tax Expenditures for Owner-Occupied Housing: Deductions for Property Taxes and Mortgage Interest and the Exclusion of Imputed Rental Income.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, doi
  19. (1992). Taxation and Housing: Old Questions, New Answers.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, doi
  20. (1996). Taxes, Mortgage Borrowing, and Residential Land Prices.” In Aaron and Gale (Eds.) Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform,
  21. (2004). The (Un)changing Geographical Distribution of Housing Tax Benefits: doi
  22. (2010). The Geographic Determinants of Housing Supply.” doi
  23. (1997). The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. doi
  24. (2010). The Long-Term Impact of Supply Constraints on House Prices in England.” Mimeo, London School of Economics. doi
  25. (2003). The Social and Private Micro-Level Consequences of Homeownership.” doi
  26. (2009). Why Do Households Without Children Support Local Public Schools? Linking House Price Capitalization to School Spending.” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.