Article thumbnail

Incapacitated? Exploring the health and illness narratives of Incapacity Benefit recipients



Previous research has focused upon health, illness and identity, but the experience of receiving welfare benefits has largely been omitted. This thesis attempts to address this deficit by exploring the relationship between long-term Incapacity Benefit (IB) receipt and stigma in areas of North East England. Employing qualitative methodology, 25 IB recipients participated in the study, alongside 18 key stakeholders who worked with IB recipients. The narratives presented in this study uncover lives that are fraught with ill health and disability on a daily basis, accompanied by a strong sense of stigma, shame and frustration. Further, not all long-term IB recipients are resigned to a life on benefits – many possess a deep-seated desire to return to the labour market, including engaging in permitted or voluntary work – a sentiment which directly refutes any ‘dependency culture’ rhetoric. Tying all of this together is the construction and reconstruction of identity for long-term IB recipients. Stigma and shame arose as a result of the widespread suspicion of sick and disabled people; suspicion that was replicated in the views of some of the stakeholders involved in this study. Disturbingly, this led to a further distinction between ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ amongst sickness benefits recipients themselves. Crucially, narratives were relayed against a backdrop of ongoing welfare reform which led to a dominant discourse of fear and insecurity for many participants who worried that their health would get worse, yet they could still be classified as ‘fit for work’. Fundamentally, this research calls for the need for a greater understanding of the lives of sick and disabled people, and an acceptance that being on sickness benefits is not the easy way out

Topics: Sickness benefits, stigma, welfare reform, narrative, rhetoric
Year: 2013
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Durham e-Theses

Suggested articles


  1. (2011a) The wrong prescription: disabled people and welfare conditionality. doi
  2. (2010). A Narrative press.
  3. (2005). Action Group (CPAG) doi
  4. (2013). Applying Qualitative Comparative England. doi
  5. (1979). Bureaucracies. Punch, (Eds.) Putnam, America.
  6. (2001). Chronic illness disruption in life: identity transformation among women 3, doi
  7. (2005). Depression and the perpetuation of an incapacitated doi
  8. (2007). Disabled people’s experiences in the workplace NICE 19: doi
  9. (2005). Does "Welfare‐to‐work" work? A systematic with
  10. (2004). Equal opportunities policy and practice in doi
  11. (1999). Ethical and methodologic benefits of using a reflexive journal doi
  12. (2010). Fair society, healthy lives. doi
  13. (2011). Fraudulent' disability in
  14. (1979). From stigma to identity politics: political activism among the physically 773. Arthur, P. Report doi
  15. (1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, doi
  16. (2005). Growing up in Poor Neighbourhoods: excluded” Macintyre, conceptualise, operationalise
  17. (2000). Identity work processes in the context of social movements: (Eds.) Self, identity, and social movements, pp. 41‐68.
  18. (2011). Incapacity Benefit Reform: The local, regional and national impact.
  19. (2010). Local differences, perceptions and Incapacity Benefit Gregg, conditionality. doi
  20. (1981). Medical and sociological typologies: the case of epilepsy. doi
  21. (2011). The language of shirkers and scroungers?' doi
  22. (1991). The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. doi
  23. (2009). The three Ds of welfare reform: disability, disgust and deservingness.
  24. (1999). Toward a model of social course in chronic illness: the example of chronic Ware, illness doi
  25. Understanding Social Exclusion, pp. 98‐117. Oxford: doi
  26. (2010). Universal Credit: Welfare That Works. London: Department for Work Ell, connection. Ellison, Social
  27. (2011). Work, worklessness and the political economy of health. doi
  28. (2005). Work' is a four‐letter word: disability, work and welfare’. social doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.