Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Interpreting the trustworthiness of government mediated by information and communication technology: lessons from electronic voting in Brazil

By Chrisanthi Avgerou, Andrea Ganzaroli, Angeliki Poulymenakou and Nicolau Reinhard

Abstract

The electronic voting system of Brazil is understood to be widely trusted by the citizens of the country and international observers. More precisely, it is seen as a trustworthy mechanism of producing election results that accurately represent the choices of the electorate. In this article, we discuss briefly the concepts of trust and trustworthiness, and focus to examine the formation of beliefs regarding the latter. We argue that the belief of trustworthiness is only partly attributable to the perception of the merits of the technical system and its enactment procedures. In our case study we found that the institutional actors responsible for the elections—the Superior and the Regional Electoral Courts—have played a key role in the formation of the belief that the electronic elections are trustworthy. We therefore conclude that, unlike common assumptions about the potential of e-government in developing countries to restore trust in government institutions that are considered untrustworthy, the production of trust in government services mediated by information and communication technology relies on citizens' perceptions of their trustworthiness

Topics: HE Transportation and Communications, JL Political institutions (America except United States), T Technology (General)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1002/itdj.20120
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:30285
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A question of Trust. Cambridge, doi
  2. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research: toward a theory of information technology culture. doi
  3. (1998). A state of trust.
  4. (2000). Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community. doi
  5. (2003). Brazil in the Age of Electronic Commerce. doi
  6. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. doi
  7. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. doi
  8. (2005). Cooperation without trust? doi
  9. (2004). Democracy in Latin America: Towards a citizens' democracy.
  10. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. doi
  11. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. doi
  12. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. doi
  13. (2006). http://www.votoseguro.org; Amílcar Brunazo Filho & Maria Aparecida Cortiz Fraudes & Defesas no Voto Electronico, AllPrint, São Paulo,
  14. (2005). ii There is some disagreement as to whether trust is important in modern society, see for example
  15. (2001). Information technology and social transformation: GIS for forestry management in India. doi
  16. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. doi
  17. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. doi
  18. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness.
  19. (2007). Post-positivist review of the technology acceptance model.
  20. (1986). Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure,
  21. (2006). Reformas Institucionais, Participação, Competição e Inclusão Política,
  22. (1994). Risk, trust, reflexivity. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Awsthetics in the Modern Social Order. doi
  23. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, doi
  24. (2001). The old generation of development economics and the new.
  25. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. doi
  26. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: the role of trust in global virtual teams. doi
  27. (2002). Trust & Trustworthiness. doi
  28. (1979). Trust and Power.
  29. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams.
  30. (2005). Trust in e-commerce. doi
  31. (1998). Trust in Government. Trust doi
  32. (2003). Trust, and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. doi
  33. (1999). Trust, voluntary association and workable democracy: the contemporary American discourse of civil society. doi
  34. (1988). Trust: Making and Breaking Co-operative Relations. doi
  35. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. doi
  36. (2004). Una decada de mediciones.
  37. xiv Up to the 2002 elections the voting machines produced printed votes too. The printing of votes was deemed a source of inefficiency, causing delays in the voting process with frequent printer failures.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.