Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Re-imagining Canadian development cooperation: a comparative examination of Norway and the UK

By Nilima Gulrajani

Abstract

This paper offers a detailed comparative study of Norwegian and UK aid architectures, with a view to informing discussions on reform and renewal within Canada’s development programme. This is undertaken via a quantitative assessment of each country’s standing on accepted measures of donor performance, as well as via a qualitative case study that traces and compares the processes and nature of organizational reforms undertaken in Norway and the UK. Based on this quantitative and qualitative analysis, lessons for Canada are presented along four key dimensions, namely strategy, governance, policy processes and organizational management

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, JZ International relations
Publisher: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:30036
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). Aid and Ebb Tide: A History of CIDA and Canadian Development Assistance. doi
  2. (2008). Aid and growth: what does the data really show? doi
  3. (2007). Aid Architectre: An Overveiw of the Main Trends in Official Development Assistance Flows.
  4. (2000). Aid effectiveness disputed. doi
  5. (2003). Aid, policies, and growth: comment. doi
  6. (2000). Aid, policies, and growth. doi
  7. (2000). Alleviating Global Poverty or Enhancing Security: Competing Rationales for Canadian Development Assistance. In doi
  8. (2006). An Index of Donor Performance, Centre for Global Development Working Paper,
  9. (1996). Apples, Pears and Poverty Reduction: An Assessment of British Bilateral Aid. doi
  10. (2009). Approaches to Strengthening CIDA: Creating an Effective Government Department for International Cooperation Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute.
  11. (2009). Auditor General of Canada. doi
  12. (1979). Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decision. Political Science Quarterly: doi
  13. (2002). Blazing the Trail: Eight Years of Change doi
  14. (2002). Canada Making a Difference in the World: a Policy Statement on Strengthening Aid Effectiveness.
  15. (2007). Canada Peer Review. doi
  16. (2007). Canadian Aid Policy in the New Millennium: Paradoxes and Tensions.
  17. (2006). Challenging the Performance Movement. doi
  18. (2010). Civil Service People Survey (CSPS): DFID Engagement Index.
  19. (2006). Civil Society and Development: How DFID works in partnership with civil society to deliver the Millennium Development Goals.
  20. (2009). Could the Senate by Right? Should CIDA be Abolished? In
  21. (2007). Creating the world’s best development agency? Confusion and Contradictions in CIDA's New Policy Blueprint.
  22. (2005). Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. doi
  23. (2009). Department for International Development: Progress and next steps, Civil Service Capability Reviews.
  24. (2004). Donor Performance: What Do We Know, and What Should We Know?, Public Policy for the Private Sector.
  25. (2010). Doublethink: The Two Faces of Norway's Foreign and Development Policy.
  26. Effective Aid Management: Twelve Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews.
  27. (1997). Eliminating World Poverty: A Challenge for the 21st Century, White Paper on International Development. doi
  28. (2009). Eliminating World Poverty: Building our Common Future, White Paper on International Development. doi
  29. (2000). Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor, White Paper on International Development. doi
  30. (2006). Eliminating World Poverty: Making Governance Work for the Poor, White Paper on International Development. doi
  31. (2010). Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation.
  32. (2010). Fixing Failed Foreign Aid: Can Agency Practices Improve?, Aiddata Conference.
  33. (2005). Focus-Pocus? Thinking Critically about Whether Aid Organizations Should do Fewer Things in Fewer Countries. doi
  34. (2003). for Economic Analysis. doi
  35. (2006). From Architecture to Networks: The Changing World of Aid.
  36. (2005). Global Governance and the Ethnography of International Aid. In
  37. (2009). Harmony and Discord: International Aid Harmonization and Donor State Domestic Influence. The Case of Canada and the Canadian International Development Agency. Johns Hopkins University,
  38. (2006). How Canada can Improve its Development Aid.
  39. (2009). How politicization has been silently killing CIDA's aid effectiveness, The Globe and Mail.
  40. (1998). Inside the IMF: an ethnography of documents, technology and organisational action.
  41. (2006). Introduction to the Symposium "Development Cooperation of Norway". Paper presented at the Development Cooperation of Norway,
  42. (2008). Is Political Analysis Changing Donor Behaviour.
  43. (2009). Keynote Address Vol. doi
  44. (2010). Making and breaking Whitehall Departments: A guide to machinery of government changes. London: Institute of Government.
  45. (2006). Making Relationships Matter for Aid Bureaucracies. In
  46. Managing Aid: Practices of DAC Member Countries.
  47. (2003). Narratives of Norwegian Governance: Elaborating the Strong State Tradition. doi
  48. Norway Peer Review.
  49. (2008). Norwegian development Aid to Civil Society: The Norwegian Bar Association's Legal Aid Project in
  50. (2009). Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. doi
  51. (2004). ODA: Options and Challenges for Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Council for International Cooperation.
  52. (2010). OECD.Stat Extracts: Aggregate Aid Statistics,
  53. (2009). One World Conservativsm: A Conservative Agenda for International Development,
  54. (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable. doi
  55. (2007). Overcoming 40 Years of Failure: A New Road Map for Sub-Saharan Africa. Ottawa: Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade.
  56. (2010). Policy Coherence and the Vision of the UK's Intenrational Development Agenda: A Report to World Vision. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
  57. (2009). Principles for Norad's Support to Civil Society in the South.
  58. (2009). Public Attitudes Towards Development TNS Report prepared for COI on behalf of DFID.
  59. (2005). Reforming Development Assistance: Lessons from the UK Experience doi
  60. (1992). Reinventing Government. doi
  61. (2009). Statistical Report on International Assistance Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
  62. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. doi
  63. Survey of the Levels of Decentralisation to the Field in DAC Members’ Development Co-operation Systems.
  64. (1997). The Audit Society. doi
  65. (2008). The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information doi
  66. (1997). The Institutional Logic of Performance Appraisal. Organization Studies, 18(2): 261–285. 64 Treasury Board Secretariat. doi
  67. (1998). The New UK White Paper on International Development: An NGO Perspective. doi
  68. (2000). The Social Organization of the IMF's Mission Work.
  69. (2004). The UK Core Executive's Use of Public Service Agreements as a doi
  70. (2006). United Kingdom Peer Review. doi
  71. (2009). Untying Aid: Is it working? An Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration and of the 2001 DAC Recommendation of Untying ODA to the LDCs.
  72. (2008). Where does all the money go? Best and worst practices in foreign aid. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.