Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Social capital in Britain: an update and critique of Hall’s analysis

By Paola Grenier and Karen Wright

Abstract

In an influential 1999 article on social capital in Britain, Peter Hall cites Britain as a counter-example to Robert Putnam’s well-known analysis of declining social capital in the United States (Hall 1999). Hall claims that there has been no equivalent erosion of social participation in Britain, although there has been an apparent decline in social trust. To explain this apparent paradox, Hall then proposes that the decline in trust may be due to changing values, as well as government policies and changes in social integration. Finally he argues that the British case provides broader lessons about distributional issues and the importance of government policy in influencing levels of social capital. In this paper we draw in newly available data sets to update Hall's assessment of the levels of social capital in Britain and provide additional analysis. The data indicates that formal participation in voluntary organisations and political engagement are increasingly concentrated in the middle and upper middle classes. In addition levels of generalised social trust have levelled out and remain low. We suggest that there are influences which were not fully considered by Hall, such as the rise in income inequality during the 1980s and the changing nature of working life. We argue that the distributional issues are critical to considering the overall levels of social capital in Britain, and that factors such as inequality , and class divisions are important societal factors when assessing social capital on a societal basis

Topics: DA Great Britain, HM Sociology
Publisher: Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:29219
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29219... (external link)
  • http://www.lse.ac.uk/collectio... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29219... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (eds) (2000a). Social Focus on Young People. Office for National Statistics,
    2. (2000). Active Community Unit (ACU)
    3. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of Community in America. Simon and Schuster, doi
    4. (1999). British social trends. doi
    5. (2000). Chapter 10: Distribution of Income and Wealth’ doi
    6. (2000). Chapter 17: Volunteers and Voluntarism’
    7. (1999). Chapter 2 - Young people and political apathy' in
    8. (2000). Chapter 8: The Labour Force’ doi
    9. (1999). Chapter 9 – ‘Social capital and the social fabric’ in
    10. (2000). Coming apart - or coming together? New findings on social participation and trust in Britain'.
    11. (2002). edition. Office for National Statistics,
    12. (1997). for Volunteering (NCV) doi
    13. Foundation (2002). Growing into Giving – young people’s engagement with charity.
    14. (2002). Great Britain: The role of government and the distribution of social capital’ in doi
    15. (1963). Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? doi
    16. (2002). Is Rising Inequality Inevitable?’ in doi
    17. (2001). Low-Flying Heroes: Microsocial enterprise below the radar screen. New Economics Foundation.
    18. (2002). Social precarity and social integration’. For the European Commission Directorate-General Employment Eurobarometer
    19. (1995). Volume 1: Inquiry into Income and Wealth. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. doi
    20. (1946). Voluntary Action. George Allen & Unwin,
    21. (2002). Working class - and proud of it! Report based on MORI social values research, found at http://www.mori.com/digest/2002/c020816.shtml (downloaded

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.