Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Understanding the global dimensions of policy

By Mathias Koenig-Archibugi

Abstract

Beyond wide agreement that many areas of contemporary policy making are unintelligible if processes that transcend the boundaries of individual states are not taken into account, analysts often disagree on how various 'global' and 'local' factors interact to produce policies and policy outcomes. The disagreement stems in part from the use of different analytic lenses, and specifically from the choice between 'state-centric' and 'polycentric' lenses. This article examines the fundamental assumptions of these general perspectives with regard to the polity, politics and policy dimensions of global policy making, and surveys some of the research questions and findings that resulted from their use. It concludes that scholars and policy makers should treat the two analytical lenses as complementary, as each of them stimulates the analyst to ask questions and look for entities and causal connections that the other lens may miss

Topics: JZ International relations, JC Political theory
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell / LSE
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00009.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:28945
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A New World Order. doi
  2. (2010). Accountability in Transnational Relations: How Distinctive Is It?’ doi
  3. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in 28International Politics. doi
  4. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. doi
  5. (2007). All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. doi
  6. (1993). Bargaining with the IMF: Two-Level Strategies and Developing Countries, ’
  7. (1964). Beyond the Nation-state: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford: doi
  8. (2007). Can Non-state Global Governance be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework’, doi
  9. (2006). Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: doi
  10. (2009). Democracy in Social Movements. doi
  11. (2008). Environmental Policy Convergence: The Impact of International Harmonization, doi
  12. (2004). Examining the Evidence on Environmental Regulations and Industry Location’, doi
  13. (1991). Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier’, World Politics, doi
  14. (2008). Global Democracy: For and Against. doi
  15. (2008). Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation 29beyond Liberal States. doi
  16. (1999). Global Transformations.. doi
  17. (2007). Global Unions: Challenging Transnational Capital Through Cross-Border Campaigns. doi
  18. (2006). Globalization and Labor Conditions. doi
  19. (1999). Globalization and Sovereignty’, doi
  20. (2006). Globalization and Tobacco.’ doi
  21. (2003). Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism and the Study of the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, doi
  22. (2003). International Capital Mobility and National Policy Divergence’,
  23. (2004). International Governance as New Raison d'État?’, doi
  24. (2007). Internationalisation and Economic Institutions: Comparing European Experiences. doi
  25. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, doi
  26. (2008). Introduction: the Diffusion of Liberalization’, doi
  27. (2000). Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics’, doi
  28. (2002). Mapping Global Governance,’ doi
  29. (1995). Mastering Space: Hegemony, doi
  30. (1994). Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. doi
  31. (2006). Non-Electoral Accountability in Global Politics: Strengthening Democratic Control within the Global Garment Industry,’ doi
  32. (1997). Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization’,
  33. (2009). Piracy Challenges Global Governance’,
  34. (1977). Power and Interdependence. doi
  35. (2003). Private Environmental Governance and International Relations: Exploring the Links’, Global Environmental Politics, doi
  36. (2006). Private-Public Puzzles: Inter-firm Competition and Transnational Private Regulation’, doi
  37. (2007). Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance’, doi
  38. (2005). Public-Private Partnerships: Effective and Legitimate Tools of Transnational Governance?’,
  39. (2008). Reconstructing Contemporary Democracy’, doi
  40. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. doi
  41. (2004). Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking’, doi
  42. (1997). Regulatory Competition and International Cooperation’, doi
  43. (2004). Remapping Global Politics. Cambridge: doi
  44. (2004). Remodeling the Competition for Capital: How Domestic Politics Erases the Race to the Bottom,’, doi
  45. (2000). Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. doi
  46. (2007). Searching for Pollution Havens: The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment’ doi
  47. (2006). Self-Regulation as Policy Process: The Multiple and Criss-Crossing Stages of Private Rule-Making’, doi
  48. (2006). States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy. doi
  49. (2002). The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law’, doi
  50. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. doi
  51. (1995). The False Promise of doi
  52. (2002). The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: The Politics of Global Health Governance’, Third World Quarterly, doi
  53. (2004). The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy’, doi
  54. (2005). The Globalization Rorschach Test: International Economic Integration, Inequality, and the Role of Government’, doi
  55. (2005). The Importance of Being Modern: International Benchmarking and National Regulatory Innovation’, doi
  56. (2006). The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement. doi
  57. (2007). The International Monetary Fund. doi
  58. (2001). The International Politics of Harmonization: The Case of Capital Market Regulation’, doi
  59. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,’ doi
  60. (2007). The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy.
  61. (2007). The Political Economy of Globalization’,D. Held
  62. (1999). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University 30Press. doi
  63. (2009). The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct’, doi
  64. (2006). The Study of World Politics, doi
  65. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: doi
  66. (1979). Theory of International Politics. doi
  67. (1995). Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. doi
  68. (2004). Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability’, doi
  69. (2010). Which Synthesis? Strategies of Theoretical Integration and the Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’, doi
  70. (1997). Who Elected the Bankers? doi
  71. (2003). Why do Governments and the IMF Enter into Agreements: Statistically Selected Case Studies’, doi
  72. (1994). Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.