Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Time and income poverty

By Tania Burchardt
Topics: HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:28341
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). 31 A number of studies have attempted to calculate the higher financial costs associated with disability (for example, Zaidi and Burchardt,
  2. (2003). 4 Extending this analysis into the 1990s,
  3. (2006). 40 See also Kan and Gershuny
  4. (2001). 41 For the quarters corresponding to the TUS fieldwork period: Autumn and Winter 2000, and Spring and Summer
  5. (1998). 46 The original budgets were calculated in 1997, which is reasonably close in time to the UK TUS in 2000, using the standard Family Budget Unit methodology: see Parker et al
  6. (2001). 49 There is a considerable literature on this subject. See, for example, Phipps, Burton and Osberg
  7. (2001). 5 The model has some features in common with the sustainable livelihoods approach used in international development. See DfID
  8. (2001). 6 The model does not address the problems which can be generated for families by members’ free time failing to overlap, so that leisure cannot be enjoyed together (Jacobs and Gerson,
  9. (2008). 9 A more recent version was recently produced (Bradshaw and colleagues,
  10. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time”, doi
  11. (2004). A theory of the misallocation of time”.
  12. (2008). Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
  13. (2005). Busyness as the badge of honour for the new superordinate working class”, Institute for Social and Economic Research working paper 2005-9. Colchester:
  14. (1934). calls this the ‘third person criterion’.
  15. (2008). Carers, Employment and Services: time for a new social contract? Carers
  16. (2005). Challenging Times. London: TUC Veblen
  17. (2006). Changing Rhythms of American Family Life, doi
  18. (2000). Changing Times: work and leisure in post-industrial society. doi
  19. (2006). Childcare and Early Years Provision: a study of parents’ use, views and experiences. Department for Education and Skills Research Report 723.
  20. (2007). Childcare Costs Continue to Rise Beyond Parents’ Reach”
  21. (2004). Choice for parents, the best start for children: a ten year strategy for childcare.
  22. (2003). Class- and gender-based working time? Time poverty and the division of domestic labour”, doi
  23. (2005). Comparing incomes when needs differ: equivalisation for the extra costs of disability in the UK”, Review of Income and Wealth, doi
  24. (2006). Dads and their babies: a household analysis, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
  25. (2004). Disabled people’s costs of living: more than you would think. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/1859352375.pdf (accessed 24/03/2008) 97
  26. (2008). Discretionary Time: a new measure of freedom. Cambridge: doi
  27. (2006). Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children”, doi
  28. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender”, doi
  29. (2008). Flexible working: a review of how to extend the right to request flexible working to parents of older children. URN 08/808. London: Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. doi
  30. for Work and Pensions doi
  31. for Work and Pensions] (2007a) The Abstract of Statistics for Benefits,
  32. for Work and Pensions] (2007b) Ready for work: full employment in our generation Cm 7290
  33. (2006). Gender Divisions and Working Time in the New Economy. doi
  34. (1986). Hearts and spades: paradigms of household economics”, doi
  35. (2006). How low-paid employees avoid poverty: an analysis by family type and household structure”, doi
  36. (2006). Income capability and child care”. Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics No 14/2006. http://swopec.hhs.se/osloec/abs/osloec2006_014.htm (accessed 20/06/2008)
  37. (2006). Informal caregivers: balancing work and life responsibilities”, Horizons:
  38. (2000). Invisible support: the determinants of time spent in informal care”.
  39. (2005). is an interesting example of attempting to incorporate a measure of the social wage into the calculation of a standard of living, alongside free time.
  40. (2007). Lone parents and ‘mini-jobs’,
  41. (1998). Low Cost but Acceptable: a minimum income standard for the UK – families with young children.
  42. (2004). Making the invisible visible: the life and time(s) of informal caregivers”.
  43. (1989). Money and Marriage. doi
  44. (2006). Mothers’ work-life balance: individualized preferences or cultural construction?” In doi
  45. (2007). New Deal for Carers”. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/SocialCare/Deliveringadultsocialcare/Carers/NewDe alforCarers/index.htm (accessed 20/06/2008) DTI [Department for Trade and Industry]
  46. (2006). New Labour and the redistribution of time”, doi
  47. (2005). Nobody to play with? The implications of leisure coordination”. In doi
  48. (2002). Non-response weighting on the ONS Time Use Survey”. In Office for National Statistics (ed) UK Time Use Survey
  49. (1997). On Economic Inequality. 2 nd edition. doi
  50. (2004). Parenting and employment”.
  51. (2007). Reassessing the ‘family-friendly workplace’: Trends and influences in Britain, doi
  52. (1984). Round About Fifty Hours a Week. Poverty Pamphlet 64. London: Child Poverty Action Group.
  53. (2007). Still Home Alone? Developing ‘next generation’ care for older children. London: 4Children. http://www.4children.org.uk/information/show/ref/1090 (accessed 31/1/08) Burchardt,
  54. (2001). Sustainable Livelihoods: guidance sheets.
  55. The (2007) The Good Childhood: a national inquiry – evidence summary two – family. London: The Children’s Society.
  56. (1934). The Economics of Household Production. doi
  57. (2007). The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 2005-06.”. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/article.asp?ID=1804&Pos=1&ColRank=1&R ank=144 (accessed 14/02/08) ONS [Office for National Statistics]
  58. (2007). The Impact of Tax Credits on Mothers’ Employment. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation http://www.jrf.org.uk/KNOWLEDGE/FINDINGS/socialpolicy/pdf/2108.pdf (accessed 24/03/2008)
  59. (2000). The National Minimum Wage: the story so far. Second report of the Low Pay Commission. Cm 4571. London: The Stationery Office http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/report/pdf/complete.pdf (accessed 24/03/2008)
  60. (2001). The temporal reorganization of employment and the household rhythm of work schedules”, doi
  61. (2006). The temporal welfare state: a crossnational comparison”, doi
  62. (2004). The temporal welfare state: the case of Finland”, doi
  63. (2005). The time cost of care”, doi
  64. (2006). The Time Use Survey 2005: how we spend our time. London: Office for National Statistics.
  65. (1978). The time-poor: a new look at poverty”, doi
  66. (2005). The time-pressure illusion: discretionary time vs free time”, doi
  67. (2008). Time doi
  68. (2001). Time and wealth: the role of time and temporalities for sustainable patterns of consumption”,
  69. (2001). Time as a source of inequality within marriage: are husbands more satisfied with time for themselves than wives?”, doi
  70. (1997). Time for Life: the surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State doi
  71. (2003). Time, through the lifecourse, in the family”. ISER working paper number
  72. (2007). Tipping the balance: the problematic nature of work-life balance in a low income neighbourhood”, doi
  73. (2003). Towards a Conceptual Framework for Studying Time and Social Capital. Families and Social Capital ESRC Research Group working paper no.3.
  74. (2000). US Poverty Studies and Poverty Measurement: the past twenty-five years. CASEpaper 42, London School of Economics. doi
  75. (2005). Valuing ‘time’ in measures of living standards”,
  76. (2007). Why Income Matters: family income, poverty and children’s lives. London: Save the Children.
  77. (1997). Women, men and the redistribution of income”, doi
  78. (2005). Work and leisure in the US and Europe: why so different?”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11278, doi
  79. (2006). Working Atypical Hours: what happens to family life?
  80. (2003). Working Time Directive Review 2003: use and abuse of the opt out.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.