(2005). 31 A number of studies have attempted to calculate the higher financial costs associated with disability (for example, Zaidi and Burchardt,
(2003). 4 Extending this analysis into the 1990s,
(2006). 40 See also Kan and Gershuny
(2001). 41 For the quarters corresponding to the TUS fieldwork period: Autumn and Winter 2000, and Spring and Summer
(1998). 46 The original budgets were calculated in 1997, which is reasonably close in time to the UK TUS in 2000, using the standard Family Budget Unit methodology: see Parker et al
(2001). 49 There is a considerable literature on this subject. See, for example, Phipps, Burton and Osberg
(2001). 5 The model has some features in common with the sustainable livelihoods approach used in international development. See DfID
(2001). 6 The model does not address the problems which can be generated for families by members’ free time failing to overlap, so that leisure cannot be enjoyed together (Jacobs and Gerson,
(2008). 9 A more recent version was recently produced (Bradshaw and colleagues,
(1965). A theory of the allocation of time”,
(2004). A theory of the misallocation of time”.
(2008). Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
(2005). Busyness as the badge of honour for the new superordinate working class”, Institute for Social and Economic Research working paper 2005-9. Colchester:
(1934). calls this the ‘third person criterion’.
(2008). Carers, Employment and Services: time for a new social contract? Carers
(2005). Challenging Times. London: TUC Veblen
(2006). Changing Rhythms of American Family Life,
(2000). Changing Times: work and leisure in post-industrial society.
(2006). Childcare and Early Years Provision: a study of parents’ use, views and experiences. Department for Education and Skills Research Report 723.
(2007). Childcare Costs Continue to Rise Beyond Parents’ Reach”
(2004). Choice for parents, the best start for children: a ten year strategy for childcare.
(2003). Class- and gender-based working time? Time poverty and the division of domestic labour”,
(2005). Comparing incomes when needs differ: equivalisation for the extra costs of disability in the UK”, Review of Income and Wealth,
(2006). Dads and their babies: a household analysis, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
(2004). Disabled people’s costs of living: more than you would think. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/1859352375.pdf (accessed 24/03/2008) 97
(2008). Discretionary Time: a new measure of freedom. Cambridge:
(2006). Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children”,
(1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender”,
(2008). Flexible working: a review of how to extend the right to request flexible working to parents of older children. URN 08/808. London: Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
for Work and Pensions
for Work and Pensions] (2007a) The Abstract of Statistics for Benefits,
for Work and Pensions] (2007b) Ready for work: full employment in our generation Cm 7290
(2006). Gender Divisions and Working Time in the New Economy.
(1986). Hearts and spades: paradigms of household economics”,
(2006). How low-paid employees avoid poverty: an analysis by family type and household structure”,
(2006). Income capability and child care”. Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics No 14/2006. http://swopec.hhs.se/osloec/abs/osloec2006_014.htm (accessed 20/06/2008)
(2006). Informal caregivers: balancing work and life responsibilities”, Horizons:
(2000). Invisible support: the determinants of time spent in informal care”.
(2005). is an interesting example of attempting to incorporate a measure of the social wage into the calculation of a standard of living, alongside free time.
(2007). Lone parents and ‘mini-jobs’,
(1998). Low Cost but Acceptable: a minimum income standard for the UK – families with young children.
(2004). Making the invisible visible: the life and time(s) of informal caregivers”.
(1989). Money and Marriage.
(2006). Mothers’ work-life balance: individualized preferences or cultural construction?” In
(2007). New Deal for Carers”. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/SocialCare/Deliveringadultsocialcare/Carers/NewDe alforCarers/index.htm (accessed 20/06/2008) DTI [Department for Trade and Industry]
(2006). New Labour and the redistribution of time”,
(2005). Nobody to play with? The implications of leisure coordination”. In
(2002). Non-response weighting on the ONS Time Use Survey”. In Office for National Statistics (ed) UK Time Use Survey
(1997). On Economic Inequality. 2 nd edition.
(2004). Parenting and employment”.
(2007). Reassessing the ‘family-friendly workplace’: Trends and influences in Britain,
(1984). Round About Fifty Hours a Week. Poverty Pamphlet 64. London: Child Poverty Action Group.
(2007). Still Home Alone? Developing ‘next generation’ care for older children. London: 4Children. http://www.4children.org.uk/information/show/ref/1090 (accessed 31/1/08) Burchardt,
(2001). Sustainable Livelihoods: guidance sheets.
The (2007) The Good Childhood: a national inquiry – evidence summary two – family. London: The Children’s Society.
(1934). The Economics of Household Production.
(2007). The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 2005-06.”. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/article.asp?ID=1804&Pos=1&ColRank=1&R ank=144 (accessed 14/02/08) ONS [Office for National Statistics]
(2007). The Impact of Tax Credits on Mothers’ Employment. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation http://www.jrf.org.uk/KNOWLEDGE/FINDINGS/socialpolicy/pdf/2108.pdf (accessed 24/03/2008)
(2000). The National Minimum Wage: the story so far. Second report of the Low Pay Commission. Cm 4571. London: The Stationery Office http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/report/pdf/complete.pdf (accessed 24/03/2008)
(2001). The temporal reorganization of employment and the household rhythm of work schedules”,
(2006). The temporal welfare state: a crossnational comparison”,
(2004). The temporal welfare state: the case of Finland”,
(2005). The time cost of care”,
(2006). The Time Use Survey 2005: how we spend our time. London: Office for National Statistics.
(1978). The time-poor: a new look at poverty”,
(2005). The time-pressure illusion: discretionary time vs free time”,
(2001). Time and wealth: the role of time and temporalities for sustainable patterns of consumption”,
(2001). Time as a source of inequality within marriage: are husbands more satisfied with time for themselves than wives?”,
(1997). Time for Life: the surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State
(2003). Time, through the lifecourse, in the family”. ISER working paper number
(2007). Tipping the balance: the problematic nature of work-life balance in a low income neighbourhood”,
(2003). Towards a Conceptual Framework for Studying Time and Social Capital. Families and Social Capital ESRC Research Group working paper no.3.
(2000). US Poverty Studies and Poverty Measurement: the past twenty-five years. CASEpaper 42, London School of Economics.
(2005). Valuing ‘time’ in measures of living standards”,
(2007). Why Income Matters: family income, poverty and children’s lives. London: Save the Children.
(1997). Women, men and the redistribution of income”,
(2005). Work and leisure in the US and Europe: why so different?”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11278,
(2006). Working Atypical Hours: what happens to family life?
(2003). Working Time Directive Review 2003: use and abuse of the opt out.