Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Good or bad money?: debasement, society and the state in the late Middle Ages

By David Chilosi and Oliver Volckart

Abstract

This paper revisits the question of debasement by analysing a newly compiled dataset with a novel approach, as well as employing conventional methods. It finds that mercantile influence on monetary policies favoured relative stability, and wage-payers did not typically gain from silver debasement. Excess demand for bullion was not a major cause of debasement. Yet monetary issues were important. Warfare made the debasement of silver but not of gold more likely. Regime types had an importance comparable to that of warfare: Princes debased silver more often than monetary unions and especially city-states. It is likely that fiscal debasements were more frequent in principalities, not least because princes debased for fiscal reasons also in the absence exceptional needs. The conclusion discusses the implications of the findings

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, HG Finance, JC Political theory, D111 Medieval History
Publisher: Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:27946
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.