Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Combining equity and utilitarianism in a mathematical programming model

By J. N. Hooker and H. Paul Williams

Abstract

We discuss the problem of combining the conflicting objectives of equity and utilitarianism, for social policy making, in a single mathematical programming model. The definition of equity we use is the Rawlsian one of maximizing the minimum utility over individuals or classes of individuals. However, when the disparity of utility becomes too great, the objective becomes progressively utilitarian. Such a model is particularly applicable not only to health provision but to other areas as well. Building a mixed-integer/linear programming (MILP) formulation of the problem raises technical issues, because the objective function is nonconvex and the hypograph is not MILP representable in its initial form. We present a succinct formulation and show that it is “sharp” in the sense that its linear programming relaxation describes the convex hull of the feasible set (before extra resource allocation or policy constraints are added). We apply the formulation to a healthcare planning problem and show that instances of realistic size are easily solved by standard MILP software

Topics: QA Mathematics
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1515
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:27099
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). A Primer in Social Choice Theory. doi
  2. (2009). A principled approach to mixed integer/linear problem formulation. doi
  3. (1972). A Theory of Justice. doi
  4. (2010). and Urologic Diseases Information Clearing House,
  5. (2010). Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk
  6. (1985). Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. doi
  7. (1982). editors. Utilitarianism and Beyond. doi
  8. (2000). Equity in health. In doi
  9. (1995). Equity in Theory and Practice. doi
  10. (2006). Equity-eciency trade-os in health technology assessment. doi
  11. (1988). Fairness and QALYs. doi
  12. (1991). Fairness in network optimal ow control: Optimality of product forms. doi
  13. (2010). Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Website, National Health Service, United Kingdom, doi
  14. (2009). Logic and Integer Programming. doi
  15. (1995). Mathematical programming for the ecient allocation of health resources.
  16. (2008). Max-min fairness and its applications to routing and loadbalancing in communication networks: A tutorial. doi
  17. (2005). Natural Justice. doi
  18. (1984). On dividing justly. doi
  19. (1997). On the lexicographic minimax approach to location problems. doi
  20. (2010). Optimality conditions for distributive justice. doi
  21. (1999). Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. doi
  22. (1989). Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls' \A Theory of Justice". doi
  23. (1987). Representability in mixed integer programming, I: Characterization results. doi
  24. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. doi
  25. (1998). The measurement of individual utility and social welfare. doi
  26. (1985). The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. doi
  27. (1998). Theories of Distributive Justice. doi
  28. (1993). Towards equitable distribution via proportional equity constraints. doi
  29. (2000). Using cost eectiveness information.
  30. (2002). Utilitarianism and the theory of justice. In doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.