Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Mixed communities: a new approach to spatially concentrated poverty in England

By Ruth Lupton and Crispian Fuller

Abstract

This article examines the adoption, by the New Labour government, of a mixed communities approach to the renewal of disadvantaged neighbourhoods in England. It argues that while there are continuities with previous policy, the new approach represents a more neoliberal policy turn in three respects: its identification of concentrated poverty as the problem; its faith in market-led regeneration; and its alignment with a new urban policy agenda in which cities are gentrified and remodelled as sites for capital accumulation through entrepreneurial local governance. The article then draws on evidence from the early phases of the evaluation of the mixed community demonstration projects to explore how the new policy approach is playing out at a local level, where it is layered upon existing policies, politics and institutional relationships. Tensions between neighbourhood and strategic interests, community and capital are evident as the local projects attempt neighbourhood transformation, while seeking to protect the rights and interests of existing residents. Extensive community consultation efforts run parallel with emergent governance structures, in which local state and capital interests combine and communities may effectively be disempowered. Policies and structures are still evolving and it is not yet entirely clear how these tensions will be resolved, especially in the light of a collapsing housing market, increased poverty and demand for affordable housing, and a shortage of private investment

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions
Publisher: Wiley
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00904.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:27086
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A decade of Hope VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington DC: Urban Institute and Brookings Institution.
  2. (2006). A Good Place for Children: Attracting and Retaining Families in Inner Urban Mixed Income Communities. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Smith,
  3. (2002). Cities and the Geographies of „Actually Existing Neoliberalism‟. doi
  4. (2003). Cleaning the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. Washington DC:
  5. (2006). Creating and Sustaining Mixed Income Communities: A Good Practice Guide. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Ball,
  6. (2003). Empowerment through participation? Conceptual explorations and a case study.' doi
  7. (2007). Ends and Means: The Future Roles of Social Housing in England. London. Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion.
  8. (2003). Financing property's contribution to regeneration, doi
  9. (2008). Gabriel.M., (forthcoming) Evaluation of the Mixed Communities Initiative Demonstration Projects: Baseline Report.
  10. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: towards an inclusive urban renaissance? doi
  11. (2007). Gentrification as a governmental strategy: Social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, doi
  12. (2005). Gentrification in the a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. doi
  13. (2003). Gentrification, housing differentiation and urban regeneration: “Going for Growth” in Newcastle upon Tyne. doi
  14. (2007). Gentrification. doi
  15. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern societies. doi
  16. (2005). Leeds calling: The influence of London on the gentrification of regional cities. doi
  17. (2005). Local limits to gentrification: Implications for a new urban policy. In doi
  18. (2003). Making global rules: globalisation or neoliberalisation? In doi
  19. (2006). Ministers rush for dilution solution‟ The Guardian Society April 26 th ((http://society.guardian.co.uk/communities/story/0,,1760905,00.html)
  20. (2004). Municipally-managed gentrification in South Parkdale, doi
  21. (2004). Neighbourhoods of Choice and Connection: The evolution of American neighbourhood policy and what it means for the United Kingdom. Joseph Rowntree Foundation (electronic format only: www.jrf.org.uk)
  22. (2004). Neoliberal urban p[olicy and new paths of neighbourhood change in the American inner city. Environment and Planning A doi
  23. (2005). Neoliberalism in (Regional) Theory and Practice. Geographical Research: doi
  24. (2005). New build gentrification and London‟s riverside renaissance. doi
  25. (2005). New Towns, New Ideas‟. Housebuilder 6 th
  26. (2003). Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) doi
  27. (2000). Our Towns and Cities: The Future. Delivering an Urban Renaissance doi
  28. (2000). Reflecting Realities: participants perspectives on integrated communities and sustainable development.
  29. (1999). Retooling the machine: economic crisis, state restructuring and urban politics. In
  30. (2007). Segregated neighbourhoods and mixed communities: A critical analysis. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation Communities and Local Government (CLG)(2007) Homes for the future: more affordable, more sustainable. London: Communities and Local Government.
  31. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh:
  32. (2008). Spoiled mixture: where does state led „positive‟ gentrification end? doi
  33. (2006). Squaring up to neoliberalism. In
  34. (2004). The evidence on the impact of gentrification: New lessons for the urban renaissance. doi
  35. (1998). The Inclusive Society: Social Exclusion and New Labour. doi
  36. (2003). The new urban policy: towards empowerment or incorporation? The practice of urban policy. In doi
  37. (2008). United and Actuated by Some Common Impulse of Passion: Challenging the Dispersal Consensus in American Housing Policy Research, doi
  38. (2008). Urban governance under neoliberalism: New Labour and the restructuring of state-space. doi
  39. (1997). When Work Disappears: The New World of the Urban Poor. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.