Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Do small states get more federal monies?: myth and reality about the US Senate malapportionment

By Valentino Larcinese, Leonzio Rizzo and Cecilia Testa

Abstract

We analyze the relationship between senate malapportionment and the allocation of the US federal budget to the states during the period 1978-2002. A substantial literature originating from the influential paper by ?) finds that small and overrepresented states get significantly larger shares of federal funds. We show that these studies suffer from fundamental identification problems and grossly overestimate the impact of malapportionment. Most of the estimated impact is not a scale but a change effect. Rather than evidence of ”small state advantage", we find that states with fast growing population are penalized in the allocation of the federal budget independently of whether they are large or small

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, JK Political institutions (United States)
Publisher: Suntory Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:25493
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25493... (external link)
  • http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/eopp/... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25493... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.