Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

On modelling endogenous default

By Dimitrios P. Tsomocos and Lea Zicchino

Abstract

Not only in the classic Arrow-Debreu model, but also in many mainstream macro models, an implicit assumption is that all agents honour their obligations, and thus there is no possibility of default. That leads to well-known problems in providing an essential role for either money or for financial intermediaries. So, in more realistic models, the introduction of minimal financial institutions, for example default and banks, becomes a logical necessity. But if default involved no penalties, everyone would do so. Hence there must be default penalties to allow for an equilibrium with partial default. What we show here is that there is an equivalence between a general equilibrium model with incomplete markets (GEI) and endogeneous default, and a model with exogenous probabilities of default (PD). The practical, policy implications are that a key function of regulators (via bankruptcy codes and default legislation), or the markets (through default premia) are broadly substitutable. The balance between these alternatives depends, however, on many institutional details, which are not modelled here, but should be a subject for future research

Topics: HG Finance, HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:24667
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003a), “Equilibrium Analysis, banking and financial 18instability,” doi
  2. (2003b), “Equilibrium Analysis, banking, contagion and financial fragility,” Bank of England WP doi
  3. (1994). A Theory of Debt Based on the Inalienability of Human Capital,” doi
  4. (2002). Collateral avoids Ponzi schemes doi
  5. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates,” doi
  6. (1977). The optimal bankruptcy rule in a trading economy using fiat money,” doi
  7. (1992). The value of money in a finitehorizon economy: a role for banks. In:
  8. (1977). Trading using one commodity as a means of payment,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.