Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Sulh: a crucial part of Islamic arbitration

By Aseel Al-Ramahi

Abstract

Arbitration and amicable settlement (sulh) have a long history within Arab and Islamic societies and have their roots in pre-Islamic Arabia. Sulh is the preferred result and process in any form of dispute resolution. Further, arbitration is favoured to adjudication in Islamic jurisprudence. In tribal and Islamic cultures, the overarching objective in conflict settlement is collectivity. Group solidarity is explored in this paper and its effect on dispute resolution is examined. The paper looks at the differences between East and West and shows that the Eastern party has an intrinsic community and a collective attitude to conflict whereas the Western party is individually minded and procedurally orientated, thus causing friction between the two sides. The distinctions between them relate to the perceptions of conflict, the formation of procedure and the status and function of the third party intervener. International commercial arbitration is sufficiently equipped to accommodate those two norms if it is used effectively

Topics: BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc, K Law (General)
Publisher: Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:24598
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24598... (external link)
  • http://www.lse.ac.uk/collectio... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24598... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.