Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Spurious unanimity and the Pareto principle

By P. Mongin
Topics: B Philosophy (General)
Publisher: The Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS), London School of Economics
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:23942
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/23942... (external link)
  • http://www2.lse.ac.uk/CPNSS/Ho... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/23942... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1976). Agreeing to Disagree", doi
    2. (1973). Behaviour and the Concept of Preference," doi
    3. (1990). Bolker-Jeffrey Expected Utility and Axiomatic Utilitarianism", doi
    4. (1986). Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography", doi
    5. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities, doi
    6. (1995). Consistent Bayesian Aggregation," doi
    7. (1996). Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge, doi
    8. (1981). Le pont aux trois arches,
    9. (1905). Manuel d'├ęconomie politique, doi
    10. (1989). On the Shared Preferences of Two Bayesian Decision Makers," doi
    11. (1990). Pareto Unanimity and Consensus", doi
    12. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, doi
    13. (1947). The Foundations of Economic Analysis, doi
    14. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics, doi
    15. (1957). Theoretical Welfare Economics, Cambridge, doi
    16. (1996). Theories of Distributive Justice, doi
    17. (1979). Utilitarianism and Welfarism", doi
    18. (1982). Utilitarianism, Uncertainty and Information," doi
    19. (1997). Utility and Ethics",
    20. (1996). What it Takes to Be a Group: Pareto vs.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.