Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The lure of choice

By Nicola J. Bown, Daniel Read and Barbara Summers

Abstract

We report three studies demonstrating the “lure of choice”: people prefer options that permit further choices over those that do not, even when those choices cannot improve the ultimate outcome. In Studies 1 and 2, participants chose between two options: one solitary item, and a pair of items between which they would then make a further choice. Participants were lured by choice: any given item was more likely to be chosen when it was initially part of a choice pair than when it was offered on its own. We also demonstrate the lure of choice in a four door version of the Monty Hall problem, in which participants could either stick with their original choice or switch to one of two unopened doors. Participants were more likely to switch if they could first ‘choose to choose’ between the two unopened doors (without immediately specifying which) than if they had to choose one door straightaway. We conclude by discussing theoretical accounts for the lure of choice, and argue that it is due to a choice heuristic that is very reliable in the natural world, but much less so in a world created by marketers

Topics: QA Mathematics, BF Psychology
Publisher: Department of Operational Research, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:22772
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22772... (external link)
  • http://www.lse.ac.uk/collectio... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22772... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1993). 1 One possible consequence of the lure of choice is that it can lead to violations of the regularity condition of choice, according to which the market share of an option cannot be made larger by adding options to the choice set
    2. (1975). 2 The formula for calculating the probability of winning by switching, reported in Selvin
    3. (1998). 3 This result is in line with those of Granberg & Dorr
    4. (1982). 4 In certain situations the lure of choice effect can produce results which are superficially similar to the asymmetric dominance effect
    5. (1975). A problem in probability.
    6. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. doi
    7. (1970). Choice as a value. doi
    8. (1989). Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. doi
    9. (2000). Choice between single-response and multichoice tasks in humans.
    10. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. doi
    11. (1999). Decoy effects and attribute-level inferences. doi
    12. (1997). Effects of number of alternatives on choice in humans. doi
    13. (2000). Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
    14. (1965). Fifty challenging problems in probability with solutions. doi
    15. (2000). Free-choice preference under uncertainty. doi
    16. (1975). Freedom and Knowledge: An experimental analysis of preference in pigeons. doi
    17. (1980). Freedom of Choice: A Behavioral Analysis. doi
    18. (1998). Further exploration of two-stage decision making in the Monty Hall dilemma. doi
    19. (1997). Grocery Revolution: The New Focus on the Consumer.
    20. (1991). Monty’s dilemma: Should you stick or switch?
    21. (1998). On the pursuit and misuse of useless information. doi
    22. (1980). Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. doi
    23. (1993). Reason-based choice. doi
    24. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
    25. (1999). Selection of forced- and free choice by monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). doi
    26. (1998). suggest that people can often be drawn by new information into making choices that they otherwise would not, and should not, have made. Learning that a professor has a bad reputation may make a student not take a course that is vital to his or her degree.
    27. (1998). Testing the reference-dependent model: An experiment on asymmetrically dominated reference points. doi
    28. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker. New York: doi
    29. (1995). The Monty Hall dilemma. doi
    30. (1991). Utility from memory and anticipation.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.