Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Intertemporal choice

By Daniel Read
Topics: QA Mathematics
Publisher: Department of Operational Research, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:22769
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22769... (external link)
  • http://www.lse.ac.uk/collectio... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22769... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1984). 6 The ‘selves’ in the hyperbolic discounting analysis are useful analytic fictions, unlike the real selves discussed by Parfit
    2. (1996). A logical economist’s argument against hyperbolic discounting.’ Working paper,
    3. (2003). A neurobiology of intertemporal choice. In
    4. (2001). A theory of time preference. doi
    5. (1981). An Economic-Theory of Self-Control. doi
    6. (1992). Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice - Evidence and an Interpretation. doi
    7. (2003). Augmented discounting: interaction between ageing and time-preference behaviour. doi
    8. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards.
    9. (2000). Can the concept of behavioural mass help explain nonconstant time discounting? doi
    10. (2001). Choice and procrastination. doi
    11. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. doi
    12. (2003). Construal level theory of intertemporal judgment and decision. In doi
    13. (1988). Consumers’ expenditure. In
    14. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. doi
    15. (1989). Discount Rates Inferred from Decisions -an Experimental Study. doi
    16. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: age differences in individual discounting functions. doi
    17. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards in opioid-dependent outpatients: Exponential or hyperbolic discounting functions? Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, doi
    18. (1991). Do Workers Prefer Increasing Wage Profiles. doi
    19. (2002). Dynamic inconsistency and self-control: a plannerdoer interpretation. doi
    20. (1995). Economic choice theory: An experimental analysis of animal behavior. Cambridge: doi
    21. (1920). Economics of Welfare. doi
    22. (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. doi
    23. (1994). Evolution of Time Preference by Natural-Selection.
    24. (1996). Expectations and preferences for sequences of health and money. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
    25. (1996). Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. doi
    26. (2003). Fear as a policy instrument. In
    27. (1994). Gain Loss Asymmetry in Risky Intertemporal Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
    28. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. doi
    29. (2003). has tested whether people’s intuitions are Parfitian. He obtained the correlation between measures of time discounting and identification with one’s future self. He found no relationship.
    30. (1995). Intergenerational Discounting. doi
    31. (2000). Intransitive intertemporal choice. doi
    32. (2000). Is it "economics and psychology"? The case of hyperbolic discounting. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv doi
    33. (2001). Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive?
    34. (1989). Judgment, decision and choice.
    35. (1959). Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: Extension to conflict behavior, motivation and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.) Psychology: A study of a science.
    36. (1998). Life-cycle consumption and hyperbolic discount functions. doi
    37. (2003). Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less?
    38. (1995). Mental conflict. doi
    39. (1874). Methods of Ethics. doi
    40. (2000). Negative and zero time preference for health. doi
    41. (1998). On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. doi
    42. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. doi
    43. (1993). Outcome Signs, Question Frames and Discount Rates. doi
    44. (1992). Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person. New York: doi
    45. (1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
    46. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. doi
    47. (1981). Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement. doi
    48. (1995). Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed Reward. doi
    49. (1975). Preferences for deferred losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 294-306Intertemporal choice Page 28 Endnotes 1 Readers who wish to find out more are directed to two volumes of chapters, Loewenstein & Elster
    50. (1993). Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes. doi
    51. (1974). Processes in delay of gratification. doi
    52. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. doi
    53. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press. doi
    54. (2002). Reasons for sequence preferences. doi
    55. (2003). Self-rationing: Self-control in consumer choice. In doi
    56. (1981). Some empirical evidence of dynamic inconsistency. doi
    57. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.’ doi
    58. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. doi
    59. (2003). Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
    60. (2001). Subjective time preference and willingness to pay for an energy-saving durable good. Zeitschrift Fur Sozialpsychologie, doi
    61. (2003). Sustaining delay of gratification over time: A hot-cool systems perspective. In
    62. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. doi
    63. (1994). Temporal Discounting and Preference Reversals in Choice between Delayed Outcomes. doi
    64. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. doi
    65. (1984). Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable delays. doi
    66. (2000). The economics of immediate gratification. doi
    67. (1997). The effect of sexual arousal on expectations of sexual forcefulness. doi
    68. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. doi
    69. (1997). The endogenous determination of time preference. doi
    70. (2003). The evolution of patience. In
    71. (1998). The illusion of delayed incentives: Evaluating future effort- money transactions. doi
    72. (1998). The magnitude effect: Temporal discount rates and restaurant tips. doi
    73. (1993). The Nature of Rationality. doi
    74. (1994). The reasonableness of nonconstant discounting. doi
    75. (1930). The theory of interest. doi
    76. (1991). Time and Outcome Valuation - Implications for Marketing Decision-Making. doi
    77. (2003). Time and the marketplace. Working paper, London School of Economics.
    78. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. doi
    79. (2003). Time discounting of health outcomes.
    80. (2003). Time preference and personal identity. In
    81. (1996). Time preference, the discounted utility model and health. doi
    82. (2001). Time preferences for the very long term. doi
    83. (1991). Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control. doi
    84. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. doi
    85. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens. Cambridge: doi
    86. (2001). Value for the future and preventive health behavior. doi
    87. (1995). Valuing the Future - Temporal Discounting of Health and Money. doi
    88. (1997). Violations of present-value maximization in income choice. Theory and Decision,
    89. (1981). who first described many of the anomalies, and who provided a model for most subsequent studies, did frame his work as a test of Fisher’s normative model.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.