Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

On the continuing problems of media effects research

By Sonia Livingstone
Topics: H Social Sciences (General), PN1990 Broadcasting
Publisher: Edward Arnold
Year: 1996
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:21503
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503... (external link)
  • http://www.arnoldpublishers.co... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1986). A synthesis of 1043 effects of television on social behaviour. doi
    2. (1973). Aggressive and prosocial televisionprograms and the natural behavior of preschool children. doi
    3. (1982). Charting the mainstream: Television's contributions to political orientations. doi
    4. (1986). Children and television: A semiotic approach.
    5. (1975). Children in front of the small screen. doi
    6. (1982). Communication models: For the study of mass communications.
    7. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. doi
    8. (1984). Critical mass communications research and media effects: The problem of the disappearing audience. doi
    9. (1990). Cultivation analysis: new directions in media effects research.
    10. (1992). Decoding tv news: the political discourse of Israeli hawks and doves. Theory and society, doi
    11. (1972). Does television violence cause aggression? doi
    12. (1983). Hooligan: A history of respectable fears. doi
    13. (1990). Ideology and modern culture: Critical social theory in the era of mass communication. doi
    14. (1965). Imitation and retention of film-mediated aggressive peer and adult models. doi
    15. (1975). Impact of television on children and youth.
    16. (1982). Impact of the introduction of television crime in the United States. Empirical findings and theoretical implications.
    17. (1983). Interpretation and inference in children's television viewing. In
    18. (1984). Intervening variables in the TV violence-aggression relation: Evidence from two countries. doi
    19. (1986). Issues bearing on the legal regulation of violent and sexually violent media. doi
    20. (1988). Legitimation crisis. doi
    21. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In doi
    22. (1990). Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. doi
    23. (1991). Mass communication and persuasion: The evolution of direct effects, limited effects, information processing, and affect and arousal models. In doi
    24. (1981). Mass communication effects. doi
    25. (1987). Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. doi
    26. (1985). Media gratifications research: Current perspectives.
    27. (1978). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. doi
    28. (1986). Media violence and anti-social behaviour. doi
    29. (1984). Media, technology and daily life. doi
    30. (1986). Naturalistic studies of the longterm effects of television violence. doi
    31. (1983). No shortcuts to judging reality. In
    32. (1978). Of mutual interest. doi
    33. (1980). On conceptualising media effects.
    34. (1988). One night of prime time: an analysis of television's multiple voices. In
    35. (1989). Overview of the effects of the mass media. In
    36. (1986). Perspectives on media effects. doi
    37. (1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide (2nd ed.). doi
    38. (1986). Propaganda and Persuasion. doi
    39. (1990). Seeing and believing: the influence of television. doi
    40. (1984). Stability of aggression over time and generation. doi
    41. (1985). Survey of the opinion of child and adolescent psychiatrists on the viewing of violent videos by children. doi
    42. (1983). Television and behavior: research conclusions of the 1982 NIMH report and their policy implications. doi
    43. (1986). Television and children: A special medium for a special audience. doi
    44. (1994). Television and everyday life. doi
    45. (1975). Television and human behaviour: The key studies.
    46. (1986). Television and the aggressive child: a crossnational comparison. doi
    47. (1991). Television and the American child. San Diego:
    48. (1958). Television and the child: An empirical study of the effect of television on the young. London: doi
    49. (1986). Television and the miners' strike. London: British Film Institute Broadcasting Research Unit.
    50. (1990). Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience. doi
    51. (1961). Television in the lives of our children. doi
    52. (1989). Television is good for your kids.
    53. (1986). Television violence and aggression: the debate continues. doi
    54. (1982). Television violence and aggressive behaviour. In doi
    55. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. doi
    56. (1982). The early window: Effects of television on children and youth.
    57. (1984). The effect of television violence on aggressiveness. doi
    58. (1974). The experiment as a social occasion.
    59. (1940). The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. doi
    60. (1992). The meaning of domestic technologies: a personal construct analysis of familial gender relations. In doi
    61. (1986). The myth of massive media impact: savagings and salvagings. doi
    62. (1983). The politics of TV violence: Policy uses of communication research. doi
    63. (1974). The spiral of silence: a theory of public opinion. doi
    64. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. doi
    65. (1977). TV violence and viewer aggression: A cumulation of study results 1956-1976. Public Opinion Quarterly, doi
    66. (1963). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. doi
    67. (1989). Violence and the mass media: the research evidence. In
    68. (1975). Witnesses aggression: Influence of an observer's sex and values on aggressive responding. doi
    69. (1994). Young offenders and the media: Viewing habits and preferences. London: Policy Studies Institute. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.