Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

‘Entrepreneurial’ local state: the implications of Beijing’s shifting emphasis on urban redevelopment policies

By Hyun Bang Shin


The entrepreneurial nature of local government activities has significantly influenced socio-economic and spatial changes in urban China. It was against this backdrop that property-led redevelopment projects were implemented in Beijing since 1990 by a programme whose very success depended on the participation of developers and prospective homebuyers as major financial contributors. By the end of 1999, roughly onefifth of Beijing’s inner city households were directly hit by this programme. In 2000, however, a new redevelopment policy was introduced in Beijing, and has received an increasing policy emphasis since then. This new policy aims at supplying affordable housing on government-provided land so that it increases existing residents’ re-housing rate. In this context, this paper aims at analysing the implications of this shifting emphasis on Beijing’s urban redevelopment policy to examine if the local government has become less entrepreneurial, thus giving more weight to promoting a more socially inclusive approach. Through a detailed examination of two case studies of inner city redevelopment projects, the paper argues that the entrepreneurial nature of the local state has remained consistent and characterises the revised redevelopment strategy, and that the entrepreneurial state activities are largely supported by the local state power to dispose of urban land use rights, which effectively makes the local state as part of urban rentiers as de facto landlords

Topics: HT Communities. Classes. Races
Publisher: Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2002) China Statistical Yearbook doi
  2. (2000). Beijing Dongcheng District Yearbook
  3. (2003). Beijing Statistical Yearbook doi
  4. (2002). Beijing Yearbook doi
  5. (2002). China's Changing Urban Governance in the Transition towards a more Marketoriented Economy, doi
  6. (2001). China's recent urban development in the process of land and housing marketisation and economic globalisation, doi
  7. (2003). Commentary: Transitional cities, doi
  8. (2003). Construction Committee of Beijing Municipal People's Political Consultative Conference et al.
  9. (2004). Cross-border urban growth: the case of Jiangyin Economic Development Zone in Jingjiang' Paper presented at 15th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia,
  10. (1999). Decentralization and coordination – World development report, doi
  11. (1992). Editorial: Forms of partnership, in:
  12. (2002). Extracting Value from the City: Neoliberalism and Urban Redevelopment, doi
  13. (1996). Fiscal Systems and Uneven Regional Development in doi
  14. (1992). Flagship Projects in Urban Regeneration,
  15. (2004). From land use right to land development right: institutional change in China's urban development, doi
  16. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism, doi
  17. (2000). From Welfare Housing to Home Ownership: The Dilemma of China's Housing Reform, doi
  18. (2005). Globalization and the development of new central business districts in Beijing, doi
  19. (1051). GOVERNMENT OF BEIJING (2001b) Housing Provident Fund accumulation during the past three quarters exceeds 100 million yuan (In Chinese: Woqu Qian San ge Jiedu Zhufang Gongjijin Guiji Chao Yi Yuan)
  20. (1992). Housing, Gentrification and Urban Regeneration Policies, doi
  21. (1999). Impacts of Land Use Rights Reform on Urban Development in China, doi
  22. (1995). Inner city redevelopment in doi
  23. (2006). Land and Territorial Politics in Urban China, doi
  24. (1999). Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China's Gradualist Urban Land Reforms, doi
  25. (1998). Making sameness: place marketing and the new urban entrepreneurialism, in: N. Oatley (Ed.) Cities, economic competition, and urban policy,
  26. (1998). Measure for the management of urban housing demolition and relocation in Beijing (In Chinese: Beijingshi Chengshi Fangwu Chaiqian Guanli Banfa)
  27. (2004). More than 20 meetings and there is still no hope in solving the disputes (In Chinese: Daxiaohui Buxia 20ci Zhengduan Jiejue Reng Wuqi), Huaxia Shibao,
  28. (1990). Notice of Mayor Chen Xi Tong's Speech on Old and Dilapidated Housing Redevelopment (In Chinese: Yinfa Chen Xi Tong Shichang Guanyu Weijiufang Gaizao Wenti Jianghua de Tongzhi)
  29. (2000). Notice of the provisional measure on facilitating the implementation of old and dilapidated housing redevelopment in Beijing (In Chinese: Guanyu Yinfa Beijingshi Jiakuai Chengshi Weijiufang Gaizao Shishi Banfa (Shixing) de Tongzhi
  30. (2003). Plan and market mismatch: Urban redevelopment in Beijing during a period of transition, doi
  31. (2003). Politics of housing redevelopment in China: The rise and fall of the Ju'er Hutong project in inner-city Beijing,
  32. (1996). Property-led local economic development policies: From advance factory to English partnerships and strategic property investment?,
  33. (2005). Property-led Redevelopment in Post-reform China: a Case Study of Xintiandi Redevelopment Project in Shanghai, doi
  34. (1991). Public/private partnership schemes in UK urban regeneration : The role of joint enabling agencies, doi
  35. (1993). Public/Private Partnerships in Enabling Shelter Strategies. Nairobi: UN-Habitat. Electronic CHM Version.
  36. (1997). Realistic choice: Reforming small state-owned enterprises (In Chinese: Xianshi de xuanze: Guoyou xiao qiye gaige shijian de chubu zongjie).
  37. (1992). Rebuilding the City: Property-led Urban Regeneration.
  38. (2005). Residents demand explanations for the changes in Haiyuncang neighbourhood planning. City Planning Committee appeals (In Chinese: Haiyuncang Xiaoqu Guihua Biangeng Jumin Taoshuofa Tousu Shi Guihuawei),
  39. (2003). Second phase of Haiyuncang neighbourhood re-housing continues (In Chinese: Haiyuncang Xiaoqu Erqi Huiqian Jiangyu Jixu Jinxing)
  40. (2006). The changing face of China: from Mao to market. doi
  41. (1999). The character and consequences of growth regimes: An assessment of twenty years of research, in: doi
  42. (1976). The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place, doi
  43. (1998). The entrepreneurial state in China: Real estate and commerce departments in reform era Tianjin. London ; doi
  44. (2000). The Global and Local Dimensions of Place-making: Remaking Shanghai as a World City, doi
  45. (2004). The left-over problem of Beijing Haiyuncang re-housing yet to be resolved (In Chinese: Beijing Haiyuncang Xiaoqu Huiqian Yiliu Wenti Jiejue reng Wuqi), China Real Estate & Housing Research Association - Council of Human Settlements,
  46. (2002). The new Chinese city: globalization and market reform. doi
  47. (1996). The new urban frontier : gentrification and the Revanchist City. doi
  48. (1995). The Role of the Local State in China's Transitional Economy, doi
  49. (1992). Towards a new city? A case study of image-improvement initiatives in Newcastle upon Tyne, in:
  50. (1984). UK inner cities: Problem construction and policy response, doi
  51. (2002). Urban Development and a Socialist Pro-Growth Coalition in Shanghai, doi
  52. (2002). Urban development under ambiguous property rights: A case of China's transition economy, doi
  53. (1987). Urban fortunes : the political economy of place. doi
  54. (2003). Urban reform and low-income communities, in: doi
  55. (1994). Urban Residential Redevelopment in the People's Republic of China, doi
  56. (1997). Urban restructuring in China's emerging market economy: towards a framework for analysis, doi
  57. (2002). Urban transformation in China, 1949-2000: A review and research agenda, doi
  58. (2004). Waterfront Regeneration, Gentrification and the Entrepreneurial State: the Redevelopment of Gunwharf Quays, Portsmouth, Spatial Policy Analysis Working Paper 51.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.