Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The determinants of cross-border equity flows

By Richard Portes and Helene Rey


We apply a new approach to a new panel data set on bilateral gross cross-border equity flows between 14 countries, 1989-96. The remarkably good results have strong implications for theories of asset trade. We find that the geography of information heavily determines the pattern of international transactions. Our model integrates elements of the finance literature on portfolio composition and the international macroeconomics and asset trade literature. Gross asset flows depend on market size in both source and destination country as well as trading costs, in which both information and the transaction technology play a role. The resulting augmented ''gravity'' equation has equity market capitalisation representing market size and distance proxying some informational asymmetries, as well as a variable representing openness of each economy. But other variables explicitly represent information transmission (telephone call traffic and multinational bank branches), an information asymmetry between domestic and foreign investors (degree of insider trading), and the efficiency of transactions (''financial market sophistication''). This equation accounts for almost 70% of the variance of the transaction flows. Dummy variables (adjacency, language, currency or trade bloc, and a ''major financial centre'' effect) do not improve the results, nor does a variable representing destination country stock market returns. The key role of informational asymmetries is confirmed. Our information transmission variables also substantially improve standard gravity equations for trade in goods

Topics: HF Commerce, HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1978). A Theory of International Trade Under Uncertainty, doi
  2. (1993). An information based explanation of the domestic bias in international equity investment’, doi
  3. (1996). Banks and the world’s major financial centers, doi
  4. (1986). Banks and the world’s major financial centers, 1970-1980’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, doi
  5. (1998). Cities and the geography of financial centres’,
  6. (1996). Country fund discounts, asymmetric information and the Mexican crisis of l994: Did local investors turn pessimistic before international investors’, doi
  7. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world?’, doi
  8. (1999). Do international investment flows smooth income?’, doi
  9. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, doi
  10. (1999). Evidence on the information geography of a stock doi
  11. (1999). Financial integration and asset returns’, forthcoming CEPR DP.
  12. (1999). Foreign portfolio investors before and during a crisis’, doi
  13. (1995). Home bias and high turnover’, doi
  14. (1994). Home bias in equity portfolios, inflation hedging, and international capital market equilibrium’, doi
  15. (1998). International home bias in international finance and business cycles’, doi
  16. (1997). International portfolio investment flows’, doi
  17. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance’, doi
  18. (1999). Multiproduct multinationals and reciprocal FDI dumping’, manuscript (revised version of CEPR doi
  19. (1996). Networks versus markets in international trade’, doi
  20. (1992). On the attractiveness of financial centers’, doi
  21. (1998). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation’, doi
  22. (1992). Opening up international trade with Eastern Europe’, Economic Policy, doi
  23. (1997). Proper econometric specification of the gravity model’, The World Economy, doi
  24. (1999). Real capital market integration in the EU’, Economic Policy, doi
  25. (1998). The emergence of the euro as an international currency’, doi
  26. (1998). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria’, doi
  27. (1998). The euro and international equity flows’, doi
  28. (1998). The portfolio flows of international investors’, doi
  29. (1998). The role of equity
  30. (1998). The spatial properties of capital flows: is location destiny?’, paper for CEPR/World Bank conference on Financial Crises,
  31. (1998). The structure of foreign trade’, doi
  32. (1988). Trade in risky assets’, doi
  33. (1999). Trade, insecurity, and home bias: an empirical investigation’, doi
  34. (1998). Understanding the home market effect and the gravity equation: the role of differentiating goods’, doi
  35. (1999). What makes hot money hot? The relative volatility of international flows of debt and equity capital’, doi
  36. (1994). Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.