Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Beveridge curve, unemployment and wages in the OECD from the 1960s to the 1990s - preliminary version

By Stephen Nickell, Luca Nunziata, Wolfgang Ochel and Glenda Quintini


This paper is an empirical analysis of unemployment patterns in the OECD countries from the 1960s to the 1990s, looking at the Beveridge Curves, real wages as well as unemployment directly. Our results indicate the following. First, the Beveridge Curves of all the countries except Norway and Sweden shifted to the right from the 1960s to the early/mid 1980s. At this point, the countries divide into two distinct groups. Those whose Beveridge Curves continued to shift out and those where they started to shift back. Second, we find evidence that these movements in the Beveridge Curves may be partly explained by changes in labour market institutions, particularly those which are important for search and matching efficiency. Third, labour market institutions impact on real labour costs in a fashion which is broadly consistent with their impact on unemployment. Finally, broad movements in unemployment across the OECD can be explained by shifts in labour market institutions although this explanation relies on high levels of endogenous persistence as reflected in a lagged dependent variable coefficient of around 0.9

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2001
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test: Evidence from Simulations and the Bootstrap’, doi
  2. (1962). A Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Tests for Aggregation Bias’, doi
  3. (1996). Assessing the Role of Labour Market Policies and Institutional Settings on Unemployment: A Cross Country Study’,
  4. (2000). Collective Bargaining (Centralization and Co-ordination)’, Ifo Institute for Economic Research:
  5. (1996). Collective Bargaining and Industrial Change: A Case of Disorganization? A Comparative Analysis of Eighteen OECD Countries’, European Sociological Review, doi
  6. (2000). Collective Bargaining Coverage’, doi
  7. (1987). Collective Bargaining in Market Economics: A Reappraisal,
  8. (1999). Do Benefit Cuts Boost Job Findings? Swedish Evidence from the 1990s’, Swedish Office of Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Working Paper 1999: 8, doi
  9. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, doi
  10. (1997). Employment Outlook, doi
  11. (1990). Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, doi
  12. (1990). Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is Euro Sclerosis?’, doi
  13. (2000). Fiscal Policy and Employment 1: A Survey of Macroeconomic Models, Methods and Findings’,
  14. (1998). International and Comparative Employment Relations. A Study of Industrialised Market Economies (London. Thousand Oaks, doi
  15. (1994). Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of Unemployment’, doi
  16. (1990). Job Security Provisions and Employment’, doi
  17. (1996). Job Security Provisions and Unemployment: Revised Estimates’, doi
  18. (1998). Key Lessons for Labour Market Reforms: Evidence from
  19. (1995). Lessons from the US Unemployment Insurance Experiments’, doi
  20. (1992). Macroeconomic Shocks in a Dynamized Model of the Natural Rate of Unemployment’,
  21. (2000). Mobility and Joblessness’, London School of Economics, Centre for Economic Performance, doi
  22. (1999). New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market’ doi
  23. (1997). Policy Complementarities: The Case for Fundamental Labour Market Reform’, doi
  24. (1999). Punitive Sanctions and the Transition Rate from Welfare to Work’, doi
  25. (2000). Roots of the Recent Recoveries: Labor Reforms or Private Sector Forces?’, doi
  26. (1957). Some Aspects of Multivariate Analysis, doi
  27. (1994). Structural Slumps, The Modern Equilibrium Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Assets, doi
  28. (1999). The Bargaining System and Performance: doi
  29. (1995). The Coverage of Collective Pay-setting Institutions in Britain, 1895-1990’, doi
  30. (1999). The Danish Economy: Medium Term Economic Survey, Ministry of Finance:
  31. (1995). The Effect of Unemployment Compensation on Unemployment Duration in Germany’, doi
  32. (1999). The Effect of Unemployment Insurance Sanctions on the Transition Rate from Unemployment to Employment’, doi
  33. (1998). The Impact of Employment Tax Cuts on Unemployment and Wages; the Role of Unemployment Benefits and Tax Structure’, doi
  34. (1990). The Impact of Potential Duration of Unemployment Benefits on the Duration of Unemployment’, doi
  35. (1997). The Missing Piece of the Unemployment Puzzle’, Inaugural Lecture,
  36. (1994). The OECD Jobs Study, Evidence and Explanations, Vols. I and II,
  37. (2000). The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence’, doi
  38. (2000). Trade Unions in doi
  39. (1997). Unemployment and Labour Market Rigidities: Europe versus North America’, doi
  40. (1997). Unemployment Compensation and Unemployment Duration – What was the Effect of the Cut in the Replacement Rate from 90 to 80 Percent?’
  41. (1996). Unemployment Duration, Unemployment Benefits and Labor Market Programs in Sweden’, doi
  42. (2000). Unemployment in the United States and doi
  43. (1987). Unemployment Insurance and Male Unemployment Duration in Canada’, doi
  44. (1998). Unemployment Insurance in Theory and Practice’, doi
  45. (1990). Unemployment: A Survey’, doi
  46. (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, doi
  47. (1996). Unionisation Trends. The OECD Countries Union Membership File’, Centre for Research of European Societies and Labour Relations,
  48. (1989). Vera-Martin Factor Endowments and Production doi
  49. (1991). Wage Determination: The Changing Role of Institutions in Advanced Industrialised Countries’, doi
  50. (1998). Wage Subsidies for the Disadvantaged’ doi
  51. (1999). Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies’, doi
  52. (2000). What do Unions do in Europe?’, A Report for the Fondazione Rodolfo DeBenedetti,
  53. (1999). What We Know and Do Not Know about the Natural Rate of Unemployment’, doi
  54. (2000). What Works among Active Labour Market Policies? Evidence from OECD Countries’, doi
  55. (1992). Workplace Industrial Relations in Transition, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.