Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Some remarks on the probability of cycles - Appendix 3 to 'Epistemic democracy: generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem'

By Christian List


This item was published as 'Appendix 3: An Implication of the k-option Condorcet jury mechanism for the probability of cycles' in List and Goodin (2001) Standard results suggest that the probability of cycles should increase as the number of options increases and also as the number of individuals increases. These results are, however, premised on a so-called "impartial culture" assumption: any logically possible preference ordering is assumed to be as likely to be held by an individual as any other. The present chapter shows, in the three-option case, that given suitably systematic, however slight, deviations from an impartial culture situation, the probability of a cycle converges either to zero (more typically) or to one (less typically) as the number of individuals increases

Topics: JA Political science (General)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Year: 2001
DOI identifier: 10.1111/1467-9760.00128
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • http://www.blackwellpublishing... (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1983). Condorcet’s Paradox," Theory and Decision doi
    2. (2001). Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem," doi
    3. (2000). Unlikelihood of Condorcet's paradox in a large society," doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.