Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Reconciling workless measures at the individual and household level: theory and evidence from the United States, Britain, Germany, Spain and Australia

By Paul Gregg, Rosanna Scutella and Jonathan Wadsworth

Abstract

Individual and household based aggregate measures of worklessness can, and do, offer conflicting signals about labour market performance. We outline a means of quantifying the extent of any disparity, (polarisation), in the signals stemming from individual and household-based measures of worklessness and apply this index to data from 5 countries over 25 years. Built around a comparison of the actual household workless rate with that which would occur if employment were randomly distributed over household occupants, we show that in all the countries we examine, there has been a growing disparity between the individual and household based workless measures. The polarisation count can be decomposed to identify which household groups are exposed to workless concentrations and can also be used to test which individual characteristics account for any excess worklessness among these household groups. We show that the incidence and magnitude of polarisation varies widely across countries, but that in all countries polarisation has increased. For each country most of the discrepancies between the individual and household workless counts stem from within-household factors, rather than from changing household composition

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:19954
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A Theory of Gender Discrimination Based on the Household,
  2. (1996). A Theory of Sex Discrimination, doi
  3. How Welfare Policies Affect Child and Adolescent Achievement’, doi
  4. (1970). On The Measurement of Inequality,” doi
  5. (2003). Opportunity for All: Fifth Annual Report’,
  6. (2003). Poverty and social exclusion in the EU after Laeken . part 2’,
  7. (2000). The impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage and Living Arrangements’,
  8. (2002). The Welfare We Want? The British Challenge for American Reform, doi
  9. (2003). Two Sides to Every Story: Measuring Worklessness and Polarisation at Household Level‘, Centre for Economic Performance Working Paper
  10. (1997). Wage Inequality and Family Labor Supply, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.