Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Perception of first-year teachers concerning the extent to which a mentoring program helps to establish efficacy with regards to organizational skills, effective classroom management skills, creative instructional strategies and strategies for retention intentions

By Winnie Anderson


The purpose of this study was to ascertain the impact of an effective mentoring program upon first-year teachers to acquire efficacy in the areas of organizational skills, effective classroom management skills, creative instructional strategies and strategies for retention intentions. A Mentor Teacher Survey Instrument was administered to new teachers in six middle schools and 27 respondents provided completed surveys. The data were computed using Cronbach coefficient alpha and correlations using version 16.0 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients computations for each subscale were as follows: .883, organizational skills subscale, .796, classroom management subscale, and .910 instructional strategies subscale. The one-sample t tests were performed to compare the mean responses of the non- demographic survey items with the neutral test value of 3.0. A bivariate correlation was used to determine the relationship between first-year teachers’ sense of efficacy for organizational skills, classroom management, instructional strategies and retention intentions. The statistical significance was established at the .05 level of probability. The SPSS 16.0 bivariate correlation procedure computed Pearson’s product-moment coefficient (r) and Spearman’s rho (p), to measure the strength of the correlation. A point biserial application of the Pearson correlation was used because one of the variables was dichotomous and the second variable was measured on an interval or ratio scale. An alpha level of .05 was set a priori was used to determine if significant differences! relationships existed between variables of interest. The SPS S data revealed a null hypothesis thus indicating that the respondents expressed a neutral attitude concerning their mentoring experience. The respondent’s responses revealed 314 negative responses out of a total of 460 positive responses. These 314 responses were computed as the lowest scores assigned by the Likert Scale. A comprehensive study was conducted in 2001 and the researcher made recommendations to the school district to revamp their induction/mentoring program and the system ignored the recommendation; therefore, this researcher supports the 2001 study and confirms that the local school district needs to make significant modification to their induction/mentoring program

Topics: Education
Publisher: DigitalCommons@Robert W. Woodruff Library, Atlanta University Center
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. 12, 2003, from http://www. sedl.orglpubs/policy23/4.html Feiman-Ncmser,
  2. (2000). A community of learners pre-service, novice, and veteran teachers learn from one another in a supportive professional development school partnership.
  3. (1998). A good teacher is hard to find.
  4. (2002). A pledge to America’s children.
  5. (1976). Analysis ofthe school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Report No. R-2007-LAUSD).
  6. (2006). APSfacts 2006-2007. Retreived
  7. (1999). Beginning teachers: The implications of contextual conditions—SEDL mentoring beginning teachers: Lessons from the experience in Texas. Retrieved
  8. (2006). Beginning teachers. Research and references—professional support and curriculum. Retrieved
  9. (2000). Big questions, worthy dreams: Mentoring young adults in their search for meaning, purpose, andfaith.
  10. (2002). Bridging the gap between schools of education and the needs 0f21st century teachers.
  11. (1996). Characteristics of the best teachers as recognized by children.
  12. (2007). Closing the Teacher Quality Gap in Philadelphia: New Hope and Old Hurdles. Teaching and Teacher Education,
  13. (2000). Coloring outside the lines Mentoring women into school leadership.
  14. (2002). Creating a teacher mentoringprogram. NEA Foundations for the Improvement of Education (NFIE)
  15. (1999). Dictionary ofstatistics & methodology: A nontechnical guidefor the social sciences. Thousand Oaks,
  16. (2002). Educational research planning: Conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River,
  17. (1996). Educational research: An introduction.
  18. (1980). Effective classroom management at the beginning of the school year.
  19. (1982). En~,wl.EV Dsl vi~,S • A rtAsra. Orc,ta;IA lifl I 4—4391 (41)4) 380-SOtlO 19.181, :i~ ,,asJbkI,.nf
  20. (2002). Essential skills for new teachers.
  21. (2004). Evaluation Process.
  22. (2003). Exploring research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
  23. (2002). Fall). Looking closely, every step of the way.
  24. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change (VoL 7). Factors affecting implementation and continuation (Report No. R- 1589/7- HEW).
  25. (2000). for Research on Teacher Learning.
  26. (2008). from http://google.eomlseareh?hlen&q =ikipedia&aq=0&oqWi
  27. (2002). from http://www.ascd.orglreadingroomlclassleadl 01 05/may01 .html
  28. (2008). from http://www.nea.orglneatoday/0002/probsolu. html National Science Teachers Association. Teacher Resources.
  29. (2006). from
  30. (1995). Handbook in educational research and evaluation: A collection ofprinci~les, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation ofstudies in education and the behavioral sciences (3”’
  31. (1970). Handbook ofclassroom management. Retrieved May 6, 2003, from http:/’PA9O&dq Kram,
  32. (1995). How to measure reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks,
  33. (2001). Human resources administration: A management approach
  34. (2002). Introduction to research in education.
  35. (2001). January-June). Saving the starfish recruiting and retaining qualjfied teachers andprincipals: A reportfor the Atlanta public school system.
  36. (1935). Job satisfaction.
  37. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do.
  38. (2004). Know Education’s Front Line: The People.
  39. (2000). Leadership for student learning.
  40. (1998). Mentoring and supervisionfor teacher development.
  41. (2003). Mentoring Beginning Teachers: The Implications of Contextual Conditions, SEDL—Mentoring Beginning Teachers: Lessons from the Expereince in Texas. Retrieved
  42. (1999). Mentoring beginning teachers: The implications of contextual conditions. In
  43. (1999). Mentoring beginning teachers: The implications of contextual conditions. SEDL—mentoring beginning teachers: Lessons from the experience in Texas. In
  44. (1997). Mentoring the most obvious yet overlooked key to achieving more in life than you dreamed Possible.
  45. (1982). Mentors andprotégés: How to establish, strengthen and get the mostfrom a mentor/protégé relationship.
  46. (1992). Mentors making a difference in our public schools.
  47. (2001). New teacher inductionlteacher mentoring guidelines at a glance. Retrieved
  48. (1998). On the importance of teaching. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from ~ttp://www.wshingtonpost.comJwp-srV/1Ocal/l0ngteI’1~~fhY/5th00~ thoughts.htm
  49. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers.
  50. (1993). Perspectives on instruction time.
  51. (1990). Phases offirst-year teaching. Newsletter for the California New Teacher Project, California Department of Education.
  52. (2008). President’s viewpoint. It’s not brain surgery! Why teachers leave and why they stay.
  53. (1993). Putting research to work in your school. New York: Scholastic Leadership Policy Research.
  54. (2006). References—Professional Support Curriculum. Retrieved
  55. (2004). Reflection and s4fefficacy: Enhancing the retention of qualffled teachersfrom a teacher education perspective. Retrieved
  56. (2002). Retention management and mefries teacher retention strategies. Retrieved November 25, 2002, from http://www.nobscot. corn/about’ teacher-retention-strategies.cfin North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
  57. (2003). SEDL—mentoring beginning teachers: Lessons from the experience in Texas. Mentoring beginning teachers: The implications ofcontextual conditions.
  58. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research.
  59. (2002). Smart induction programs become lifelines for the beginning teacher.
  60. (1960). Some personality determinants ofthe effects ofparticipation,
  61. (1997). Spring). Principal~ approach: An Interview with Tern GoffiDubois. Retrieved May 6, 2003, from newed/spring97/Goffllntv.htm Goodlad,
  62. (2004). Statisticsfor the behavioral sciences.
  63. (2001). Supporting beginning teachers: How administrators, teachers andpolicymakers can help new teachers succeed.
  64. (2008). Teacher education quarterly: Reflection and Sejf-Efficacy: Enhancing the Retention ofQualffled Teachersfroma Teacher Education\Perspective.
  65. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.
  66. (2005). Teacher mentor handbook.
  67. (2001). The best practices ofmentors. Classroom leadership online.
  68. (2001). The effects of consistency management on student mathematics achievement in seven chapter I elementary schools.
  69. (2002). The element ofteaching.
  70. (1997). The eleven keys to leadershz~.
  71. (2002). The Fape Site.
  72. (1977). The need for thick description: A qualitative investigation of developing teachers’ perceived efficacy. Retrieved
  73. (2001). The new mentors andprotégés: How to succeed with the new mentoringpartnerships. Grass Valley, CA: Coalition of Counseling Centers.
  74. (2008). The Oregon School Boards Association. The education workforce shortage: The 3R’s take on new meaning. Retrieved
  75. (2000). The pocket mentor: A handbook for teachers.
  76. (1993). The return of the mentor: Strategies for workplace learning. Mentoring for teachers: The collaborative approach.
  77. (1977). Why managersfail. Chicago: The National Underwriter Company.
  78. (1964). Work and motivation.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.