Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Taxation for the enabling state

By John Hills


This paper takes as its starting point Henry Neuburger's injunction that taxation must be seen as a contribution to the maintenance of the welfare state, not as a dead-weight burden. It sets recent developments in the UK tax ratio in the context of changes in public spending, particularly on welfare services, in the public sector's balance sheet, and the distributional effects of both tax and spending. It then discusses tax and transfer policy since the change of governance in May 1997 in the context of public attitudes to inequality and different forms of redistribution. It compares the distributional effects of the four Labour Budgets since July 1997 with those which would have resulted from simply indexing the April 1997 tax and social security system for income growth. This suggests that actual reforms will on average deliver as much to lower income groups as income indexation would have done, but at lower cost to the public finances, and in a way which is more consistent with public attitudes. However, delays between Budget announcements and implementation meant that inequality and relative poverty increased in Labour's first two years in office. If further progress is to be made towards the target of abolishing child poverty in a generation, the measures so far announced will have to be added to each year

Topics: HJ Public Finance
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2000a) Budget 2000: Prudent for a Purpose, HC 346, The Stationery Office,
  2. (2000b) Public Expenditure: Statistical analyses, 2000-01, Cm. 4601, The Stationery Office,
  3. (2000). (2000c) Spending Review
  4. (1997). (writing as S. Gray)
  5. (1999). An International Comparison of Taxes and Social Security Contributions (19986-1996)’, Economic Trends,
  6. DSS (2000b) Households Below Average Income 1994/5-1998/9, Corporate Document Services,
  7. (2000). How Effective is the British Government’s Attempt to Reduce Child Poverty?, CASEpaper 38, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics,
  8. (1996). Public spending and taxation’
  9. (1979). Real’ National Saving and its Sectoral Composition, Bank of England Discussion Paper No.6, Bank of England,
  10. Social Security [DSS] (2000a) The Changing Welfare State: Social Security Spending, doi
  11. (1999). Social security, selective universalism and patchwork redistribution’, in
  12. (1996). Tax policy: are there still choices?’
  13. (1980). The British Tax System (second edition).
  14. (1997). The Changing Distribution of the Social Wage,
  15. (1995). The Dynamic of Welfare: Social policy and the life cycle, Harvester/Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead. doi
  16. (2000). The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 1998-99’, Economic Trends,
  17. (2000). The labour market impact of the working families’ tax credit’, doi
  18. (1998). The State of Welfare: The economics of social spending (second edition), doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.