Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Youth-adult differences in the demand for unionization: are American, British and Canadian workers all that different?

By Alex Bryson, Rafael Gomez, Morley Gunderson and Noah Meltz

Abstract

This paper examines demand for union membership amongst young workers in Britain, Canada and the United States. The paper benchmarks youth demands for collective representation against those of adult workers and finds that a large and significant representation gap exists in all three countries. Using a model of representation advanced by Farber (1982) and Riddell (1993) we find that a majority of the union density differential between young and adult workers is due to supply-side constraints rather than a lower desire for unionisation on the part of the young. This finding lends credence to two conjectures made in the paper; the first is that tastes for collective representation do not differ among workers (either by nationality or by age) and second that union representation can be fruitfully modelled as an experience good. The experience good properties of union membership explain the persistence of union density differentials amongst youth and adults both over time and across countries

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:4956
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). Canadian and American Attitudes Toward Work and Institutions’,
  2. (1974). Consumer Behaviour, Retailer Power and Market Performance doi
  3. (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum’, doi
  4. (2001). From Playstations to Workstations: Youth Preferences for Unionisation in Canada’, Discussion Paper No. 512, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
  5. (2001). Frustrated Demand for Unionisation: the Case of the United States and Canada Revisited’, Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No.
  6. (1992). Industrial Organization and Public Policy, 3 rd Edition,
  7. (1985). Labour Movements in Canada and the United Sates’,
  8. (2001). Liking the Workplace You Have: the Incumbency Effect in Preferences Towards Unions’, Working Paper No. 1115, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
  9. (2000). Marketing Management: International Edition, doi
  10. (2001). Notes on the Economics of Labour Unions’,
  11. (2001). Recent Discussion Papers from the ‘Future of Trade Unions in Modern Britain’ Programme Centre for Economic Performance
  12. (1991). Social Networks and Persistent Inequality in the Labor Market: Toward an Economic Analysis’,
  13. (1982). The Determination of the Union Status of Workers’, doi
  14. (1997). The Representation Gap: Change and Reform in the British and American Workplace, doi
  15. (1993). Union Membership in the United States: the Decline Continues’, doi
  16. (1993). Unionisation in Canada and the United States: A Tale of Two Countries’,
  17. (2001). You Can’t Always Get What You Want: Frustrated Demand for Unionisation in Britain’, Working Paper.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.