Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Economic geography and international inequality

By Stephen Redding and Anthony J. Venables

Abstract

This paper estimates a structural model of economic geography using cross-country data on per capita income, bilateral trade, and the relative price of manufacturing goods. More than 70% of the variation in per capita income can be explained by the geography of access to markets and to sources of supply of intermediate inputs. These results are robust to the inclusion of other geographical, social, and institutional characteristics. The estimated coefficients are consistent with plausible values for the structural parameters of the model. We find quantitatively important effects of distance, access to the coast, and openness on levels of per capita income

Topics: HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform, HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2001
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:3714
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth’, doi
  2. (1997). Access to Western Markets and Eastern Effort’, doi
  3. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, doi
  4. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife’, doi
  5. (1997). Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff?’, doi
  6. (1984). Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Regressions with Generated Regressors’, doi
  7. (1998). Geography and Economic Development’, doi
  8. (1995). Global Income Patterns: Does Geography Play a Role?’, Chapter 2 of Phd Thesis,
  9. (2000). Gravity with Gravitas: a Solution to the Border Puzzle’, doi
  10. (1997). Index of Economic Freedom, The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal,
  11. (2001). Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade’, World Bank Economic Review, doi
  12. (2001). Institutions and Geography: Comment of Acemoglu, doi
  13. (1977). Location in Space, Harper and Row: doi
  14. (1998). Market Access, Economic Geography, and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment’, doi
  15. (1998). Market Potential, Increasing Returns, and Geographic Concentration’, doi
  16. (1997). National Cultures of the World: A Statistical Reference, doi
  17. (1981). Nonparametric Estimates of Standard Error: The Jackknife, The Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Methods’, doi
  18. (1998). Shipping Costs, Manufactured Exports, and Economic Growth’, paper presented at the American Economic Association Meetings,
  19. (1998). Social Capability and Economic Growth’, doi
  20. (1982). The Colonial Empires: A Comparative Survey from the Eighteenth Century, doi
  21. (2000). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation’, doi
  22. (1954). The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States’, doi
  23. (1994). The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-country Data’, doi
  24. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, doi
  25. (1999). Towards a Geography of Trade Costs’, doi
  26. (2000). Trade in Capital Goods’, paper presented at CEPR doi
  27. (1999). Why Do Dome Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.