Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The challenge of engaging youth online: contrasting producers' and teenagers' interpretations of websites

By Sonia Livingstone

Abstract

Media research has long known that those who produce content and those who receive it construe textual meaning differently. Such differences may be interpreted in political, cultural, institutional and psychological terms. However, the insights from audience reception and ethnographic studies have yet fully to inform research on responses to online content. This article addresses attempts to overcome youth civic disengagement through the design and promotion of public sector, Internet-based content and services. Specifically, it integrates interviews with website producers and teenage users to compare and contrast the encoding and decoding processes in an exemplar website (www.epal.tv). An analysis in terms of genre reveals a range of communicative challenges for website producers in terms of subject matter, formal composition and mode of address. Further, critical questions arise in relation to the action consequences of online participation, interface design as this relates to teens' Internet literacy, and the power relations instantiated between producer and user. It is concluded that audience studies can constructively be extended to the analysis of Internet use and, substantively, that the policy challenge lies less in the question of whether youth is civically engaged and more in the question of who will listen to youth if and when they do become so engaged

Topics: P Philology. Linguistics
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1177/0267323107076768
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:2769
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2769/... (external link)
  • www.epal.tv). (external link)
  • http://ejc.sagepub.com/ (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2769/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2005). Active participation or just more information? Young people’s take up of opportunities to act and interact on the internet. doi
    2. (2003). Citizen-consumers. New Labour’s marketplace democracy. A Catalyst Working Paper.
    3. (2002). Designing From Both Sides of the Screen: How Designers and Engineers can Collaborate to build a Co-operative Technology.
    4. (2003). Electronic democracy and young people. doi
    5. (1981). Forms of Talk. doi
    6. (1980). Interaction between text and
    7. (2006). Interactivity: Users, documents, and systems. doi
    8. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people. London:
    9. (2006). Introduction. In doi
    10. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. doi
    11. (2005). Mediating the web as a public space. A local experiment in the creation of online civic genres.
    12. (2004). Mixed messages: Youth participation and democratic practice. doi
    13. (1984). New directions for critical communications research. doi
    14. (2002). Politics and new media.
    15. (2003). Public participation and risk governance.
    16. (1998). Rhetorics on the Web: Hyperreading and Critical Literacy. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to Screen: Taking Literacy Into the Electronic Era (pp. doi
    17. (2006). Taking audience research into the age of new media: Old problems and new challenges. doi
    18. (2005). Teens and Technology. Washington DC:
    19. (2004). The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the internet age? doi
    20. (2005). The lonely citizen: Indirect representation in an age of networks. doi
    21. (1980). The Nationwide Audience: Structure and Decoding. London: British Film Institute.
    22. (1979). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: doi
    23. (1998). The Uncivic Culture: Communication, Identity, and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics. doi
    24. (2005). Turnout or turn off? General Election
    25. (2005). UK Children Go Online: Final report of key project findings. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
    26. (2005). Who do you think we are?' A content analysis of websites as participatory resources for politics, business and civil society. In Interface://Culture: The world wide web as political resources and aesthetic form
    27. (2002). Why don't British young people vote at general elections? doi
    28. (2005). Young citizens, ICTs and learning. A design for a study of the media and political activity.
    29. (2003). Young people talk about citizenship: empirical perspectives on theoretical and political debates. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.