Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Causes of sprawl: a portrait from space

By Marcy Burchfield, Henry G. Overman, Diego Puga and Matthew Turner
Topics: G Geography (General)
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.587
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1974). A comparative static analysis of urban spatial structure. doi
    2. (1999). A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity.
    3. (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review Papers and
    4. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. doi
    5. (1991). Analyzing urban decentralization — the case of Houston. doi
    6. (1982). cbd hypothesis and economies of agglomeration. doi
    7. (2000). CensusCD 1980, Version 2. East
    8. (1969). Cities and Housing. doi
    9. (2004). Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs. doi
    10. (2001). Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover data set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources.
    11. (2001). Consumer city. doi
    12. (2001). Cross-sectional evolution of the us city size distribution. doi
    13. (2001). Decentralized employment and the transformation of the American city. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs :1–47. doi
    14. (1975). Discontinuous urban-development and economic efficiency. doi
    15. (1995). Economic-growth in a crosssection of cities. doi
    16. (2002). Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth. Cambridge: doi
    17. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. doi
    18. (2000). for Civic Journalism. doi
    19. (1987). General equilibrium modelling of systems of cities. doi
    20. (2000). Ground Water Atlas of the United States. Reston va: United States Geological Survey. doi
    21. (1981). Growth, speculation and sprawl in a monocentric city. doi
    22. (2002). Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns. doi
    23. (1990). Land Use and Land Cover Digital Data from 1:250,000- and 1:100,000-scale Maps: Data User Guide 4. Reston va: United States Geological Survey. doi
    24. (2005). Landscape preferences and patterns of residential development. doi
    25. (1964). Location and Land Use; Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. doi
    26. (2002). Measuring Sprawl and its Impact. doi
    27. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. doi
    28. (1982). Multiple equilibria and structural transition of nonmonocentric urban configurations. doi
    29. (2001). National Resources Inventory (revised December 2000): A guide for users of
    30. (1997). National Resources Inventory Data Collection Instructions: Primary Sampling Unit Module II — Farmsteads and Developed Areas.
    31. (2002). Nitrate in aquifers beneath agricultural systems. doi
    32. (2000). of the Census. doi
    33. of the Census. 1994–98. American Housing Survey. doi
    34. (2002). On the internal structure of cities. doi
    35. (2003). Principal Aquifers of the 48 Conterminous United States,
    36. (1994). Redevelopment and the urban land price gradient. doi
    37. (1998). Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data. doi
    38. (1998). Regional land cover characterization using Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51(1–2):415–428. doi
    39. (2004). Spatial distribution of economic activities in North America. doi
    40. (1997). Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using gis. doi
    41. (1976). Spatial patterns of urban-growth — optimum and market. doi
    42. (2004). Sprawl and urban growth. doi
    43. (2001). Sprawl Hits the Wall: Confronting the Realities of Metropolitan Los Angeles. Los Angeles„ ca:
    44. (1978). Suburban employment and zoning — general equilibrium-analysis. doi
    45. (2000). Summary Report: doi
    46. (1993). The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. doi
    47. (1985). The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins doi
    48. (2002). The effects of open space on residential property values. doi
    49. (1987). The interjurisdictional effects of growth controls on housing prices. doi
    50. (1999). The rise and decline of the American ghetto. doi
    51. (1974). The sizes and types of cities.
    52. (1990). The stochastic city. doi
    53. (1987). The structure of urban equilibria: A unified treatment of the Muth-Mills model. doi
    54. (1979). The transition of land to urban use. doi
    55. (2003). The United States as a coastal nation.
    56. (2002). The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 19(1):91–98. doi
    57. TransferabilityofNationwide Personal Transportation Survey Data to Regional and Local Scales. Oak Ridge, tn:
    58. (1996). Urban development with lags. doi
    59. (2003). Urban evolution in the usa. doi
    60. (2000). Urban growth models with durable housing: An overview.
    61. (1983). Urban spatial dynamics: A review. Sistemi Urbani 3:411–475.
    62. (1998). Urban spatial structure. doi
    63. (1997). us Environmental Protection Agency. doi
    64. (1995). us Federal Highway Administration. doi
    65. (2001). Who sprawls most? how growth patterns differ across the us. Survey series,

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.