Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Estimating potential output: a survey of the alternative methods and their applications to Brazil

By Nelson H Barbosa-Filho


This paper presents the main issues involved in estimating potential output. The objective is to describe the alternative methods and analyze their application and implications for growth forecasts and macroeconomic policy in Brazil. The text emphasizes the determinants of potential output under fixed and flexible coefficients of production. Given the wide use of aggregate measures of total factor productivity in growth accounting, and the sensitivity of such a variable to economic assumptions and errors of measurement, the text also presents the main applied critiques and alternatives to aggregate growth-accounting exercises. The main conclusions are: (1) the annual potential growth rate of Brazil’s GDP varies substantially depending on the method and hypotheses adopted and, what is most important, potential GDP is not separable from effective GDP in the long-run; (2) growth-accounting and time-series studies of Brazil result in low potential-output growth rates because they extrapolate the slow growth of 1981-2003 to the future; (3) capital seems to be the main constraint on growth in Brazil and, therefore, a demand-led increase in investment can raise both its effective and potential output levels; (4) however, because of the slow adjustment of the capital stock, an investment boom can also hit a supply constraint before the stock of capital has time to adjust to the growth rate of investment; and (5) aggregate measures of potential output do not carry much information about the economy and, therefore, they should be complemented by sectoral estimates of capacity utilization to identify the bottlenecks in inter-industry flows and the corresponding demand pressures on inflation.Potential Output, Brazil

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth,”
  2. (2000). A note on the theory of demand-led growth,” Contributions to Political
  3. (1983). A plain man’s guide to Kaldor’s growth laws,”
  4. A simple model of demand-led growth and income distribution,
  5. (2004). Accounting for Brazil’s Growth Experience
  6. (2003). Aggregation in production functions: what applied economists should know.”
  7. (1997). Analytical Development Economics: The Less Developed Economy Revisited,
  8. (1999). and New Growth Theories, An Assessment.
  9. (1992). Business Cycles: Theory, History, Indicators, and Forecasting,
  10. (1997). Capacity utilization,”
  11. (1992). Capital Accumulation in Latin America: A Six Country Comparison for 1950-89.” Review of Income and Wealth,
  12. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom,
  13. (2001). CBO’s Method for Estimating Potential Output: An Update.
  14. (2004). Combining Hodrick-Prescott Filtering with a Production function Approach to Estimate Output Gap, paper presented at the conference Seminário 5 Anos de Metas de Inflação, Banco Central do Brasil,
  15. (1993). Detrending, Stylized Facts and the Business Cycle,”
  16. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor,”
  17. (1995). Economic Growth,
  18. (2003). Effective demand and growth in a one-sector Keynesian model.”
  19. (2000). Estimativa do Estoque de Riqueza Tangível no Brasil,
  20. (2003). Evolução da produtividade total dos fatores na economia brasileira:
  21. (1989). Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter,
  22. (1984). Growth and Distribution,
  23. (1999). Growth and Distribution.
  24. (1990). Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development,
  25. (2002). Has the Business Cycle Changed and Why?,” NBER Working Paper 9127. 61
  26. (1997). I just ran four million regressions,”
  27. (1991). Income Distribution, Inflation and Growth: Lectures on Structuralist Macroeconomic Theory,
  28. (1985). Input-Output Economics, Foundations and Extensions,
  29. (2001). Is growth exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer and Weil seriously,”
  30. (1983). Kaldor’s laws in retrospect,”
  31. (1979). Macro models for developing countries,
  32. (1946). Measuring Business Cycles,
  33. (2003). Medium-Size Macroeconomic Model for the Brazilian Economy,” Texto para Discussão 64, Brasília: Banco Central do Brasil.
  34. (2003). of Economic Analysis
  35. (2003). Old and New Growth Theory: what role for aggregate demand?” Em:
  36. (2002). Penn World Table Version 6.1,
  37. (1997). Postwar US business cycles: An empirical investigation,”
  38. (1990). Productivity and Economic Growth.” In:
  39. (2004). Reconstructing Macroeconomics : Structuralist Proposals and Critiques of the Mainstream,
  40. (1997). Reflections on the Natural Rate Hypothesis,”
  41. (1981). Spectral Analysis and Time Series,
  42. (2003). Standardised capital stock estimates in Latin America: a 1950-94 update,”
  43. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.”
  44. (1997). Tendências populacionais no Brasil e pressão sobre o mercado de trabalho futuro,” In: Velloso, J.P.d.R. (coord.), Brasil – desafios de um país em transformação, José Olympio Editora.
  45. (2001). The balance-of-payments constraint: from balanced trade to sustainable debt.” Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro Quarterly Review,
  46. (2003). The Congress of the United States. 58 Congressional Budget Office
  47. (1996). The Discovery of the Residual: A Historical Note,”
  48. (1993). The Growth Accounting Tradition and Proximate Sources of Growth.” In:
  49. (1997). The Measurement of Depreciation in the US National Income and Production Accounts.”
  50. (1981). The Measurement of Economic Depreciation.” In:
  51. (1953). The methodology of positive economics,”
  52. (1992). The translog production function and variable returns to scale,”
  53. (1997). Time to ditch the NAIRU,”
  54. (1997). Time-varying NAIRU and its implications for economic policy,”
  55. (2000). Total factor productivity: A Short Biography,”
  56. (1973). Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers,”
  57. (1986). Univariate Detrending Methods with Stochastic Trends,”
  58. (1997). What do we know and do not know about the natural rate of unemployment,”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.