Location of Repository

Carbon Mitigation Costs for the Commercial Sector: Discrete-Continuous Choice Analysis of Multifuel Energy Demand

By William Pizer and Richard Newell

Abstract

We estimate a carbon mitigation cost curve for the U.S. commercial sector based on econometric estimation of the responsiveness of fuel demand and equipment choices to energy price changes. The model econometrically estimates fuel demand conditional on fuel choice, which is characterized by a multinomial logit model. Separate estimation of end uses (e.g., heating, cooking) using the 1995 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey allows for exceptionally detailed estimation of price responsiveness disaggregated by end use and fuel type. We then construct aggregate long-run elasticities, by fuel type, through a series of simulations; own-price elasticities range from –0.9 for district heat services to –2.9 for fuel oil. The simulations form the basis of a marginal cost curve for carbon mitigation, which suggests that a price of $20 per ton of carbon would result in an 8% reduction in commercial carbon emissions, and a price of $100 per ton would result in a 28% reduction.commercial energy demand, carbon policy, climate change, discrete choice

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. A Look at Commercial Buildings in 1995: Characteristics, Energy Consumption, and Energy Expenditures. DOE/EIA-0625(95). Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration.
  2. A National Micro-Data Based Model of Residential Electricity Demand: New Evidence on Seasonal Variation.
  3. (1993). A Survey of Energy Demand Elasticities
  4. (1984). An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption.
  5. (1981). Analyzing Demand Behavior: A Study of Energy Elasticities. Baltimore: Resources for the Future and Johns Hopkins
  6. (2002). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States
  7. (1993). Information Administration (EIA).
  8. (1983). Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge:
  9. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys.
  10. (2003). Personal communication.
  11. (1999). Price Responsiveness in the NEMS Buildings Sector Models.
  12. (1986). Qualitative Choice Analysis.
  13. (1996). Quebec Residential Electricity Demand: A Microeconometric Approach.
  14. (1984). Residential Electricity Demand: A Suggested Appliance Stock Equation.
  15. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.
  16. (1993). Short Run Income Elasticity of Demand for Residential Electricity Using Consumer Expenditure Survey Data.
  17. (1990). The Demand for Energy
  18. (1968). The Interpretation and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Functions Econometrica 35(3-4):
  19. (1991). The Microeconometric Approach to Modeling Energy Demand: Some Results for UK Households.
  20. (1980). The Total and Appliance-Specific Conditional Demand for Electricity in the Household Sector.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.