Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Colombia's Discharge Fee Program: Incentives for Polluters or Regulators?

By Allen Blackman

Abstract

Colombia’s discharge fee system for water effluents is often held up as a model of a well-functioning, economic-incentive pollution control program in a developing country. Yet few objective, up-to-date evaluations of the program have appeared. Based on a variety of primary and secondary evaluative data, this paper finds that that the program has been beset by a number of serious problems including limited implementation in many regions, widespread noncompliance by municipal sewage authorities, and a confused relationship between discharge fees and discharge standards. Nevertheless, in several watersheds, pollution loads dropped significantly after the program was introduced. While proponents claim the incentives that discharge fees created for polluters to cut emissions in a cost-effective manner were responsible for this success, this paper argues that the incentives they created for regulatory authorities to improve permitting, monitoring, and enforcement were at least as important.environment, economic incentive, market based instrument, discharge fees, water pollution, Latin America, Colombia

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). 24 Resources for the Future Blackman IDEAM. 2002a. Perfil del Estado de los Recursos Naturales y del Medio Ambiente en Colombia
  2. (1994). 25 Resources for the Future Blackman Panayotou, T.
  3. (2004). An Evaluation of the Colombian Water Pollution Retributive Charges. Draft Report.
  4. (2001). Aplicación de Instrumentos Económicos en la Gestión Ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe: Desafíos y Factores Condicionantes. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Santiago de Chile.
  5. (2001). Aplicación del Principio Contaminado-Pagador en América Latina: Evaluación de la Efectividad Ambiental y Eficiencia Económica de la Tasa pro Contaminación Hídrica en el Sector Industrial Colombiano.
  6. (2005). Assessment of Colombia’s National Environmental System (SINA). Final Report to the World Bank. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  7. (2003). Case Study: The Colombian Water Tax. In
  8. (2003). Choosing Environmental Policy Instruments in the Real World. Paper prepared for OECD Global Forum on Sustainable Development: Emission Trading.
  9. (1985). Comparative Analysis of Alternative Policy Instruments.
  10. (1992). Contaminación Hídrica en Colombia. Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
  11. (1997). Developing a Culture of Compliance in the International Environmental Regime. Environmental Law Reporter 27.
  12. (1994). Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy: Lessons from the OECD Experience and Their Relevance to Developing Countries.
  13. (2002). Emissions Trading in Santiago: Why Has It Not Worked,
  14. (2000). Estado de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente 1999–2000.
  15. (2001). Estado de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente 2000–2001.
  16. (2002). Estado de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente 2001–2002.
  17. (2003). Estado de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente 2002–2003.
  18. (2005). Financial Incentives and Endogenous Enforcement in China’s Pollution Levy System.
  19. (1999). Greening Industry: New Roles for Communities, Markets, and Governments.
  20. (2002). Incentive-Based Policies for Environmental Management in Developing Countries. Resources for the Future Issue Brief 02-07.
  21. (1994). La Conformidad y la Aplicación de la Legislación Ambiental.
  22. (1998). La Experiencia Colombiana en las Tasas por Uso del Agua. Oficina de Análisis Económico:
  23. (1999). Market Based Instruments for Environmental Policy-Making
  24. (1972). On Taxation and Control of Externalities.
  25. (2004). Perfil del Estado de los Recursos Naturales y del Medio Ambiente en Colombia
  26. (2003). Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management.
  27. (1994). Policy Instruments for Water Management in Brazil. In Applying Economic Instruments to Environmental Policies in OECD and Dynamic Nonmember Economies.
  28. (2003). Política Fiscal para la Gestión Ambiental en Colombia. XV Regional Seminar on Fiscal Policy, Economic Commission for Latin America and the
  29. (2002). Sector de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico: Retos y Resultados.
  30. (2002). Self-Reported Data on CARs for 2002. Office of Planning.
  31. (1997). Tasas Retributivas: Manual de Implementación. Oficina de Análisis Económico:
  32. (2000). The Use of Economic Incentives in Developing Countries: International Experience with Industrial Air Pollution.
  33. (1994). The Use of Economic Instruments in Environmental Management: The East Asian Experience. In Applying Economic Instruments to Environmental Policies in OECD and Dynamic Nonmember Economies.
  34. (1975). Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge:
  35. (1989). Transferable Discharge Permit Systems and Environmental Management in Developing Countries. World Development 17(8):1299–1312.
  36. (2005). Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial (MAVDT).
  37. (2000). Wastewater Effluent Charge in Mexico.
  38. (2005). Water Issues. In

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.