Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Higher Education, the Health Care Industry, and Metropolitan Regional Economic Development: What Can “Eds & Meds” Do for the Economic Fortunes of a Metro Area’s Residents?

By Timothy J. Bartik and George Erickcek

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of expansions in higher educational institutions and the medical service industry on the economic development of a metropolitan area. This examination pulls together previous research and provides some new empirical evidence. We provide quantitative evidence of the magnitude of economic effects of higher education and medical service industries that occur through the mechanism of providing some export-base demand stimulus to a metropolitan economy. We also provide quantitative evidence on how much higher education institutions can boost a metropolitan economy through increasing the educational attainment of local residence. We estimate that medical service industries pay above average wages, holding worker characteristics constant, whereas the higher education industry pays below average wages; the wage standards of these industries may affect overall metropolitan wages. We also discuss other mechanisms by which these two industries may boost a metropolitan economy, including: increasing local amenities, generating R&D spillovers, increasing the rate of entrepreneurship in local businesses, and helping provide local leadership on development and growth issues. Finally, the paper discusses possible effects of these two industries on disparities between the central city and suburbs in a metropolitan area.higher, education, medical, service, industry, regional, economic, development

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). A Revealed Preference Approach to Ranking City
  2. (2007). Association of American Medical Colleges.
  3. (2001). Budget Cuts vs. Tax Increases at the State Level: Is One More Counter-Productive Than the Other During a Recession?” Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
  4. (2006). College-to-Work Migration of Technology Graduates and Holders of Doctorates within the United States.”
  5. (1988). Do Suburbs Need Cities?”
  6. (1993). Economic Development and Black Economic Success.” Report prepared for the U.S. Economic Development Administration. Also available as Upjohn Institute
  7. (2006). Education Pays.
  8. (2006). Education Sciences.
  9. (2004). Estimating the Social Return to Higher Education: Evidence from Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Data.”
  10. (2006). for Health Statistics.
  11. (2003). Health Works Program.
  12. (1992). Higher Education and Regional Development.” In
  13. (1989). Identifying Productivity and Amenity Effects in
  14. (1987). Inter-Industry Wage Differences and Industry Characteristics.” In
  15. (2006). Interarea Price Levels: An Experimental Methodology.” Monthly Labor Review 129(9).
  16. (2001). Jobs for the Poor: Can Labor Demand Policies Help?
  17. (2000). Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity.”
  18. (1997). Local Geographic Spillovers between
  19. (2007). Moving Forward: MSU Trustees OK Purchase of Site for Grand Rapids Med School.” Lansing State Journal,
  20. (2001). National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
  21. (2004). of Public Hospitals and Health Systems.
  22. (2000). Places Rated Almanac (Special Millennium Edition).
  23. (2003). Research Universities and Local Economic Development: Lessons from the History of Johns Hopkins
  24. (2003). Scripps’ New Florida Center Will Likely Spur Thousands
  25. (2004). Searching for Silicon Valley in the Rust Belt: The Evolution of Knowledge Networks
  26. (2006). Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital.”
  27. (2005). Solving the Problems of Economic Development
  28. (1995). Temple’s Vision of Community: A Super-Arena, New Houses, New Stores. If Only the City Would Agree.” Philadelphia Inquirer,
  29. (1991). The Economic Impact of Hospitals in
  30. (2004). The Effect of College Location on
  31. (1994). The Effects of Metropolitan Job Growth on the Size Distribution of Family Income.”
  32. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class.
  33. (2004). The Rise of the Skilled City.” In
  34. (1991). The Structure of Local Public Finance and the
  35. (2004). Thinking About Local Living Wage Requirements.”
  36. (2001). Third-Tier Cities: Adjusting to the New Economy.” Mt. Auburn Associates report prepared for the Economic Development Administration,
  37. (2004). Universities and the Development of Industry Clusters.”
  38. (1993). Universities and the Startup of New Companies:
  39. (2006). Urbanization, Productivity and Innovation: Evidence from Investment in
  40. (1995). Using Geographic Variation in College Proximity to Estimate the Return to Schooling.” In
  41. (1991). Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.