Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Modernization of Agriculture and Long-Term Growth

By Dennis Tao Yang and Xiaodong Zhu

Abstract

This paper develops a two-sector model that illuminates the role played by agricultural modernization in the transition from stagnation to growth. When agriculture relies on traditional technology, industrial development reduces the relative price of industrial products, but has a limited effect on per capita income because most labor has to remain in farming. Growth is not sustainable until this relative price drops below a certain threshold, thus inducing farmers to adopt modern technology that employs industry-supplied inputs. Once agricultural modernization begins, per capita income emerges from stasis and accelerates toward modern growth. Our calibrated model is largely consistent with the set of historical data we have compiled on the English economy, accounting well for the growth experience of England encompassing the Industrial Revolution.long-term growth, transition mechanisms, relative price, agricultural modernization, structural transformation, the Industrial Revolution, England.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World.
  2. A Quantitative Model of the British Industrial Revolution:
  3. (1962). Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge:
  4. Accounting for Fertility Decline During the Transition to
  5. (1971). Agricultural Development: An International Perspective.
  6. Agricultural Productivity Growth and Escape from the Malthusian Trap.”
  7. (1992). Agricultural Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and Economic Growth.”
  8. (1996). Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy 1500-1850. Cambridge:
  9. (1964). Agriculture and Aggregate Productivity: A Quantitative Cross-Country Analysis.”
  10. (1997). Agriculture and the
  11. (2004). Barriers and the Transition to Modern Growth.”
  12. (2001). Beyond Balanced Growth.” Review of Economic Studies,
  13. (1969). British Economic Growth 1688-1959, Second Edition. Cambridge:
  14. (1988). British Historical Statistics. Cambridge:
  15. British Industrial Revolution before 1841: Evidence of Slower Growth during the Industrial Revolution.”
  16. (1990). Change: The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England. Cambridge, UK:
  17. Changes in Sectoral Composition Associated with
  18. (1972). Dualistic Economic Development: Theory and History.
  19. (2003). Frictionless Technology Diffusion: The Case of Tractors.”
  20. (2005). From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory.”
  21. (2002). Malthus to
  22. (1979). Mechanization in Agriculture: A Study of the Adoption Process.” In
  23. (1992). Output Growth and the Industrial Revolution:
  24. (1998). Pessimism Perpetuated: Real Wages and the Standard of Living
  25. (1993). Science for Agriculture: A Long-Term Perspective,
  26. (2000). Structural Change and Economic Growth.” Review of Economic Studies,
  27. Structural Change in a Multisector Model
  28. Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and
  29. (1500). The Agricultural Revolution and the Industrial Revolution: England,
  30. (1988). The Agricultural Transformation,” in Hollis Chenery
  31. (2008). The Depressing Effect of Agricultural Institutions on the Prewar Japanese Economy.” J o u r n a lo fP o l i t i c a lE c o n o m y ,
  32. The Development of a Dual
  33. (2002). The Industrial Revolution: Past and Future.”
  34. (1990). The Level of Riches:
  35. (1981). The Population History of England 1541-1871: A Reconstruction.
  36. (2007). The Role of Agriculture in
  37. (2001). The Secret History of the Industrial Revolution.”
  38. (2001). The US Structural Transformation and Regional Convergence: A Reinterpretation.”
  39. The World Economy: A Millennia Perspective.
  40. (2009). Trade and the Diffusion of
  41. (2001). Was an Industrial Revolution Inevitable? Economic Growth over the Very Long Run.”
  42. (1997). Was Prometheus Unbound by Chance? Risk,
  43. (1990). What Really Happened to Real Wages?: Trends

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.