Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Impact of Teams on Output, Quality and Downtime: An Empirical Analysis Using Individual Panel Data

By Derek Jones and Takao Kato


To investigate the size and the timing of the direct impact of participatory arrangements on business performance, we assemble and analyze extraordinary daily data-- for rejection, production and downtime rates for all operators in a single plant during a 35 month period, more than 77,000 observations. Consistent with core hypotheses that employee involvement enhances productivity and quality through mechanisms including employees becoming better motivated, more informed and paying greater attention to product details, we find that membership in offline teams: (i) initially enhances individual productivity by about 3%; (ii) and lowers rejection rates by about 27%. We also find that: (iii) these improvements are dissipated, typically at 10 to 16% per 100 days in a team; (iv) while initially teams lead to more downtime, these costs diminish over time; (v) the performance-enhancing effects of team membership are generally greater and more long-lasting for team members who are solicited by management; (vi) similar relationships exist for more educated team members. These findings square with diverse hypotheses concerning predicted gains from complementarities in organizational design, the benefits that flow from management solicitation and enhanced education, but are inconsistent with hypotheses based on Hawthorne effects.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). Careers in Organizations: Theory and Evidence,"
  2. (2003). Changing Employment Practices and the Quality of Jobs in Central New York: Evidence from Case Studies of Medium-Sized Manufacturing Establishments in Central New York,"
  3. (2003). Changing Incentives for Production Employees: Impacts on Establishment Economic Outcomes and Worker Satisfaction," Paper presented at the 55th IRRA meeting,
  4. (1995). Complementarities and Fit: Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Manufacturing."
  5. (1998). Complementarity and Cost Reduction: Evidence from the Auto Supply Industry,"
  6. Consequences of Quality Circles in an Industrial Setting: A Longitudinal Assessment."
  7. (1996). Diffusion and Performance of Modular Production in the U.S. Apparel Industry." Industrial Relations,
  8. Do "High-Performance" Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?"
  9. Employee Participation and Productivity."
  10. (1995). Employee Participation, Ownership, and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework." Industrial Relations,
  11. Experience, Performance, and Earnings."
  12. (1986). High-Involvement Management: Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,
  13. How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?"
  14. How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity."
  15. (1995). Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry." Industrial and Labor Relations Review,
  16. Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Retail Banking."
  17. (2006). Human Resource Management Policies and Productivity: New Evidence from an Econometric Case Study." Oxford Review of Economic Policy,
  18. (1999). It's Not What You Pay It's the Way That You Pay It and That's What Gets Results: Jockeys' Pay and Performance." Labour,
  19. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca and London:
  20. (1996). Methodological Issues in Cross-Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource-Firm..." Industrial Relations,
  21. Monitoring, Motivation, and Management: The Determinants of Opportunistic Behavior in a Field Experiment."
  22. (1994). Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership among Labor, Management, and Government (Hardcover).
  23. (1997). New York and Melbourne:
  24. (2005). Opportunity Counts: Teams and the Effectiveness of Production Incentives."
  25. (1995). Participation and Productivity: A Comparison of Worker Cooperatives and Conventional Firms in the Plywood Industry."
  26. (1990). Participation, Productivity and the Firm's Environment,"
  27. (1996). Participative Bureaucracy and Productivity in the Machined Products Sector." Industrial Relations,
  28. (1990). Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence.
  29. Peer Pressure and Partnerships."
  30. Performance Pay and Productivity."
  31. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization."
  32. (2007). Productivity Effect of Piece Rate Contracts: Evidence from Two Small Field Experiments,"
  33. Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint."
  34. Skill-Biased Organizational Change? Evidence from a Panel of British and French Establishments."
  35. Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data."
  36. (1989). Strategies for Learning: Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry. Berkeley and London:
  37. Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation."
  38. (2000). The Anatomy of Employee Involvement and Its Effects on Firms and Workers,"
  39. (2004). The Effect of Self-Managed and Closely-Managed Teams on Labor Productivity and Product Quality: An Empirical Analysis of a Cross Section of Establishments," Mimeo,
  40. The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines."
  41. (2003). The Effects of New Work Practices - Evidence from Employer-Employee Data.,"
  42. The Firm as an Incentive System."
  43. (1998). The Impact of Financial Participation and Employee Involvement on Financial Performance: A Re-Estimation Using the
  44. The Internal Economics of the Firm: Evidence from Personnel Data."
  45. (1994). The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States.
  46. (1995). The Productivity Effects of Employee Stock-Ownership Plans and Bonuses: Evidence from Japanese Panel Data." American Economic Review,
  47. (2002). The Productivity Effects of Participatory Employment Practices: Evidence from New Japanese Panel Data." Industrial Relations,
  48. The Provision of Incentives in Firms."
  49. (2003). The Recent Transformation of Participatory Employment Practices,"
  50. The Response of Worker Effort to Piece Rates: Evidence from the British Columbia Tree-Planting Industry."
  51. The Wage Policy of a Firm."
  52. (2003). Trust in the New Economy,"
  53. Using "Insider Econometrics' to Study Productivity."
  54. (1999). What Do Workers Want?
  55. (1999). What Is Social Capital? The Determinants of Trust and Trustworthiness,"
  56. (1996). What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment." Industrial Relations,
  57. What's Driving the New Economy? The Benefits of Workplace Innovation."
  58. (1999). Work Organization, Technology, and Performance in Customer Service and Sales." Industrial and Labor Relations Review,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.