Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

On the many as one : a reply to Kornhauser and Sager

By Christian List and Philip Pettit

Abstract

In a recent paper on ‘The Many as One’, Lewis A. Kornhauser and Lawrence G. Sager look at an issue that we take to be of great importance in political theory. How far should groups in public life try to speak with one voice, and act with one mind? How far should public groups try to display what Ronald Dworkin calls integrity? We do not expect the many on the market to be integrated in this sense. But should we expect integration among the many in the legislature, for example, or among the many on the courts? We agree with Kornhauser and Sager about a number of their claims but think that they miss out on important detail and do not achieve a fully general perspective on the issues raised. Our own contribution is in three sections. We address, first, the nature of the integrity challenge; second, the range of cases in which the challenge arises; and third, the question of whether public groups should be designed and required to meet that challenge

Topics: JC Political theory
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00037.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:669
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/669/1... (external link)
  • http://www.blackwellpublishing... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/669/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.