Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Globalization and the right to free association and collective bargaining: an empirical analysis

By Eric Neumayer and Indra De Soysa

Abstract

Economies that are more open to trade and foreign direct investment face greater competitive pressure than closed ones. Globalization critics are concerned that this pressure induces countries to lower labor standards in order to remain competitive and retain or attract foreign investment. Defenders of globalization counter that countries that are more closely integrated into global markets are likely to have higher rather than lower standards. This article tests the effect of globalization on a specific labor right, which forms part of what are commonly regarded as core or fundamental labor standards. Employing a new measure of free association and collective bargaining rights, we find that countries that are more open to trade have fewer rights violations than more closed ones. This effect holds in a global sample as well as in a developing country sub-sample and holds also when potential feedback effects are controlled via instrumental variable regression. The extent of an economy’s ‘penetration’ by foreign direct investment has no statistically significant impact. Globalization might not be beneficial for outcome-related labor standards, but it is likely to promote the process-related standard of a right to free association and collective bargaining

Topics: H Social Sciences (General)
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.06.009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:628
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/628/1... (external link)
  • http://www.elsevier.com/locate... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/628/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1994). A hard-h eaded look at labour standard s .
    2. (1994). A hard-headed look at labour standards.
    3. (2003). and Poverty—A Selective Survey. IMF Working Paper 03/30. Washington, DC : Intern a t i o n a l Moneta r y Fund).
    4. (2001). Bernst e i n , A.
    5. (1999). Boon or bane? Reasse s s i n g the product i v i t y of foreign direct investm e n t .
    6. (1999). Boon or bane? Reassessing the productivity of foreign direct investment. doi
    7. (1998). Borenzs t e i n , E., De Grego r i o
    8. (2003). Can Labor Standards Improve under Globalization? doi
    9. (2001). Core labor standa r d s and co mpet i t i v e n e s s : im pl i c a t i o n s f o r gl obal trade policy.
    10. (2001). Core labor standards and competitiveness: implications for global trade policy. doi
    11. (1997). Core labour standa r d s and export perfor m a n c e in develop i n g countr i e s . World Economy
    12. (2002). Core labour standa r d s and foreig n direct invest m e n t .
    13. (1997). Core labour standards and export performance in developing countries. doi
    14. (2002). Core labour standards and foreign direct investment. doi
    15. (1999). d e - S i l a n e s , F., Shleif e r
    16. (2002). Database of Political Institutions. doi
    17. (2002). Database of Political Institutions. W a shing t o n , DC:
    18. (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkel e y : The Univer s i t y of Califo r n i a Press.
    19. (2005). Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries? Working Paper. London School of Economics and Political Science. doi
    20. (2004). Do foreign investors care about labor market regulations? Policy Resea r c h W o rki n g Paper 3275. W a shi n g t o n , D C : W o rld Bank.
    21. (2004). Do foreign investors care about labor market regulations? Policy Research Working Paper 3275. doi
    22. (2002). Do labor standar d s affect com p arat i v e advantag e in developi n g countries?
    23. (2002). Do labor standards affect comparative advantage in developing countries?. doi
    24. (2003). Do transna t i o n a l cor porat i o n s care about labor standard s ?
    25. (2003). Do transnational corporations care about labor standards?
    26. (2002). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? Working Paper 9273. doi
    27. (2002). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? Working Paper 9273. Ca m b ri d g e , MA: Nation a l Bur eau of Econom i c Resear c h .
    28. (2001). Do-it-yourself labor standards.
    29. (1998). Does globali z a t i o n underm i n e labour standards? L e ssons from Ea st Asia.
    30. (1998). Does globalization undermine labour standards? Lessons from East Asia. doi
    31. (1995). Econom i c reform and the process of global integra t i o n .
    32. (2003). Economic Freedom of the World: doi
    33. (1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. doi
    34. (1997). Eight ways to thi nk about interna t i o n a l labour standar d s .
    35. (1997). Eight ways to think about international labour standards.
    36. (2000). Fighting the Wrong Enemy: Antiglobal Activists and Multinational Enterprises. doi
    37. (2000). Fighting the Wrong Enemy: Antiglobal Activists and Multinational Enterprises. W a s h i n g t o n , DC: Insti t u t e for Inter n a t i o n a l Econo m i c s .
    38. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment, Democracy, and Development: Assessing the Contours, Correlates, and Concomitants of Globalization. doi
    39. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment, Democracy, and Development: Assessing the Contours, Correlates, and Concomitants of Globalization. London: Routle d g e . doi
    40. (1996). Foreign Investment and Political Conflict in Developing Countries. doi
    41. (1996). Foreign Investment and Political Conflict in Developing Countries. N e w York: Praege r .
    42. (1996). Free trade and evolvi n g st anda r d s .
    43. (1996). Free trade and evolving standards. In
    44. (2004). Freed o m House doi
    45. (2004). Freedom in the World. doi
    46. (2003). Freem a n , R.B.
    47. (1998). Global Market s and Nationa l Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle ? doi
    48. (1998). Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle? doi
    49. (1996). Goldsm i t h
    50. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? doi
    51. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? W a s h ington, DC: Institute for Interna t i o n a l Econom i c s .
    52. (2004). How do trade union rights affect trade competitiveness?. doi
    53. (2004). How do trade union rights affect trade competitiveness?. W o rkin g Paper No. 39. Gene va: Intern a t i o n a l Labour Office and Interna t i o n a l Institu t e for Labour Studies .
    54. (1998). How Does Foreign Investment Affect Economic Growth?
    55. (2004). In Defense of Globalization. New Yor k : doi
    56. (1998). Indust r i a l relations system s and US foreig n direct investm e n t abroad.
    57. (1998). Industrial relations systems and US foreign direct investment abroad. doi
    58. (1995). Interna t i o n a l trad e and the role of labor standards. International Economic Review, August. W a shingt o n , DC: US Internat i o n a l Trade Comm is s i o n s .
    59. (1997). International Labor Standards and International Trade. IMF working paper doi
    60. International Trade and Core Labour Standards. Paris: Organi s a t i o n for Econom i c Co-ope r a t i o n and Develop m e n t .
    61. International Trade and Core Labour Standards. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    62. (1995). International trade and the role of labor standards.
    63. (2000). Kapst e i n
    64. (2003). L opez-de - S i l a n e s doi
    65. (2001). Labor standar d s : W h ere do they belong on the internat i o n a l trade agen d a ?
    66. (1996). Labor standards in inte rna t i o n a l trade: do they m a tter and what do we about them ? .
    67. (1996). Labor standards in international trade: do they matter and what do we about them?. In
    68. (2001). Labor standards: Where do they belong on the international trade agenda? doi
    69. (2000). Labor’s New Internat i o n a l i s m . doi
    70. (2000). Labor’s New Internationalism. doi
    71. (1998). Labour standa r d s and trade flows doi
    72. (1998). Labour standards and trade flows of OECD countries. doi
    73. (2004). Measuring trade union rights: A country-level indicator constructed from coding violations recorded in textual sources. doi
    74. (2004). Measuring trade union rights: A country-level indicator constructed from coding violations recorded in textual sources. W o rk i n g P a pe r N o. 50. Geneva: Intern a t i o n a l L a bour Office , Sta tis t i c a l Develo p m e n t and Analysi s Unit. doi
    75. (2001). Models of international labor standar d s .
    76. (2001). Models of international labor standards. doi
    77. (2005). Neum a y e r
    78. (2004). On the determ i n a n t s of co re labour standar d s : the case of develop i n g countr i e s .
    79. (2004). On the determinants of core labour standards: the case of developing countries. doi
    80. (2002). Penn World Tables Version 6.1 . Cente r for Interna t i o n a l Com p a r i s o n s at the Universi t y of Pennsylv a n i a .
    81. (2002). Penn World Tables Version 6.1.
    82. (2003). Political Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy . Book m a nus cr i p t . Massach u s e t t s Institut e of Technolo g y .
    83. (2003). Polity IV Project . Univ e r s i t y of Maryl a n d .
    84. (2004). Power Politics and International Labour Standards . Working paper. Elon Univers i t y , D e par t m e n t of Econo m i c s .
    85. (2004). Power Politics and International Labour Standards. Working paper. doi
    86. (2003). Racing to the bottom : international trade without a social clau se . Third World Quarterly doi
    87. (2005). Racing to the Bottom or Climbing to the Top? Foreign Direct Investment and Labor Rights Violations. W o rking Paper. Universi t y of North Carolin a at Chapel Hill.
    88. (2005). Racing to the Bottom or Climbing to the Top? Foreign Direct Investment and Labor Rights Violations. Working Paper.
    89. (2003). Racing to the bottom: international trade without a social clause. doi
    90. (2001). Realiz i n g Labor Standa r d s : How Transpa r e n c y , Com p eti t i o n , and Sancti o n s Cou l d Im prov e Workin g Condit i o n s Worldwi d e .
    91. (2001). Realizing Labor Standards: How Transparency, Competition, and Sanctions Could Improve Working Conditions Worldwide.
    92. (1997). Should core labor standards be imposed through international trade policy? . W a shington DC: W o r l d Bank. doi
    93. (1997). Should core labor standards be imposed through international trade policy?. Washington DC: doi
    94. (1994). T h e im port a n c e of in ternational labour st anda r d s in a m o re com p e t i t i v e globa l ec ono m y .
    95. (2002). The ad option of international labor standards conventi o n s : who, when, and why? . Brookings Trade Forum doi
    96. (2002). The adoption of interna t i o n a l labor standa r d s conven t i o n s : who, when, and why? – Comm ents and Discussion. Brookings Trade Forum
    97. (2002). The adoption of international labor standards conventions: who, when, and why? – Comments and Discussion. Brookings Trade Forum doi
    98. (2002). The adoption of international labor standards conventions: who, when, and why?. Brookings Trade Forum doi
    99. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy. doi
    100. (2001). The effects of core worker rights on labour costs and foreign direct investment: evaluating the “conventional wisdom”. Discussion Paper. doi
    101. (2001). The effects of core worker rights on labour costs and foreign direct investment: evaluating the “conventional wisdom”. Discussion Paper. Geneva: Internat i o n a l Institut e for Labour Studies. doi
    102. (2003). The effects of core worker rights on labour costs and foreign direct investment: evaluating the “conventional wisdom”. W o rking Paper. Geneva: Internat i o n a l Institut e for Labour Studies. doi
    103. (2003). The effects of core worker rights on labour costs and foreign direct investment: evaluating the “conventional wisdom”. Working Paper. doi
    104. (2003). The effects of multinational production on wages and working conditions in developing countries. Wor k i n g Paper 9669. Ca m b ri d g e , MA: Nation a l Bureau of Econom i c Resear c h . doi
    105. (2003). The effects of multinational production on wages and working conditions in developing countries. Working Paper 9669. doi
    106. (2004). The Globalization of Libe ralization: Policy Dif f u s i o n in the In ter n a t i o n a l Polit i c a l Econo m y .
    107. (2004). The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. doi
    108. (1994). The importance of international labour standards in a more competitive global economy.
    109. (1995). The interaction between labour standard s and internat i o n a l trade polic y .
    110. (1995). The interaction between labour standards and international trade policy. doi
    111. (1999). The Quality of Government. doi
    112. (2003). The regulation of labor. Working Paper 9756. doi
    113. (2004). Trad e and labour standa r d s: theory and new em pi r i c a l ev id e n c e .
    114. (2003). Trade and com p e t i t i v e n e s s aspect s of enviro n m e n t a l and labor standar d s in East Asia. In
    115. (2003). Trade and competitiveness aspects of environmental and labor standards in East Asia. In
    116. (2004). Trade and labour standards: theory and new empirical evidence. doi
    117. (2005). Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Child Labor. World Development, doi
    118. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. doi
    119. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. University of Maryland and Harvard Univer s i t y . doi
    120. (1996). Trade, Employment and Labour Standards . Paris: Organisation f o r Econom i c Co-ope r a t i o n and Develop m e n t .
    121. (1996). Trade, Employment and Labour Standards. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    122. (2003). Trade, Growth, and Poverty—A Selective Survey. IMF Working Paper 03/30. doi
    123. (1994). Trade, Multinationals, and Labor. NBER working paper 4836. doi
    124. (1994). Trade, Multinationals, and Labor. NBER working paper 4836. Ca m b ri d g e , MA: Nation a l Bureau of Econom i c Resear c h .
    125. (2000). Who Gives Aid to Whom and Why? doi
    126. (1996). Why Do More Open Countri e s Have Bigger Governm e n t s ? Ca m b ri d g e , MA: Nation a l Bureau of Econom i c Resear c h .
    127. (1996). Why Do More Open Countries Have Bigger Governments? doi
    128. (1999). Why Do Som e Countr i e s Produc e so Much More Output Per Worker than Others? doi
    129. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others? doi
    130. (2000). Winners and Losers in the Global Economy. doi
    131. (1992). Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. doi
    132. (2003). World development indicators on CD-Rom. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.