Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Asylum recognition rates in Western Europe : their determinants, variation, and lack of convergence

By Eric Neumayer


Substantial variation in recognition rates for asylum claims from the same countries of origin and therefore prima facie equal merit subjects refugees to unfair and discriminatory treatment. This article demonstrates the extent of variation and lack of convergence over the period 1980 to 1999 across Western European destination countries. Refugee interest groups also suspect that political and economic conditions in destination countries as well as the number of past asylum claims unduly impact upon recognition rates. This article estimates the determinants of asylum recognition rates. Origin-specific recognition rates vary, as they should, with the extent of political oppression, human rights violations, inter-state armed conflict and events of genocide and politicide in countries of origin. Recognition rates for the full protection status only are lower in times of high unemployment in destination countries. Such rates are also lower if many asylum seekers from a country of origin have already applied for asylum in the past

Topics: JV Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration, H Social Sciences (General), JN Political institutions (Europe)
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1177/0022002704271057
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (2000). A Comparative Analysis of the Asylum Policy of Seven European Governments. doi
    2. (1999). A new asylum regime in Europe. In Refugee Rights and Realities: Evolving International Concepts and Regimes,
    3. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. doi
    4. (2002). Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. doi
    5. (2003). Asylum Applications and Recognition Rates in EU Member States 1982-2001: A Quantitative Analysis. doi
    6. (2001). Asylum Applications in Industrialized Countries: 1980-1999. United Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. doi
    7. (2004). Asylum Destination Choice – What Makes Some Western European Countries more Attractive than Others?, European Union Politics doi
    8. (1998). Asylum Migration to the European Union: Patterns of Origin and Destination. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    9. (2002). Asylum Policy in the West – Past Trends, Future Possibilities.
    10. (2005). Bogus Refugees? The Determinants of Asylum Migration to Western Europe, doi
    11. (2001). Comparative Analysis of Reception Conditions for Persons Seeking Protection in the Member States of the European Union.
    12. (1996). Council of the European Union. doi
    13. (1999). Country of Asylum by Choice or by Chance: doi
    14. (1999). Country of Asylum by Choice or by Chance: Asylum-Seekers in Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK. doi
    15. (2000). Die Europäische Union auf dem Weg zu einem gemeinsamen Asylrecht. doi
    16. ECRE Comments on the European Commission Staff Working Paper Revisiting the Dublin Convention. London: European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
    17. (2000). Estimates of Income per capita for the World Health Report doi
    18. (2002). Freedom in the World. doi
    19. (2000). Harmonization, Asylum, and Temporary Residence.
    20. (2003). Home Minister Presents Asylum Figures – Pro Asyl: Annual Statistics Show Deficit of Asylum Procedure. Press Release,
    21. (2002). Minorities at Risk Database.
    22. (2000). Negotiating Asylum – The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. doi
    23. (1997). Political Data Handbook: OECD Countries. Second Edition. doi
    24. (2002). Political Strength of Political Parties by Ideological Group in Capitalist Democracies. 21-Nation Pooled Time-Series Data Set. UNHCR.
    25. Research Paper on Non-state Agents of Persecution. London: European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
    26. (2003). Statistical Database. Geneva: International Labour Organisation. doi
    27. (2002). Statistical Yearbook
    28. (1991). The ‘Realism’ of a European Asylum Policy: A Quantitative Approach. Netherlands Quarterly on Human Rights 9:142-158.
    29. (1991). The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, doi
    30. (2002). Understanding the Decision-Making of Asylum Seekers. Home Office Research Study 243. London: Home Office. doi
    31. (2001). World Development Indicators on CD-Rom. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.