Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Persuasion bias, social influence, and uni-dimensional opinions

By Peter M. DeMarzo, Dimitri Vayanos and Jeffrey Zwiebel

Abstract

We propose a boundedly rational model of opinion formation in which individuals are subject to persuasion bias; that is, they fail to account for possible repetition in the information they receive. We show that persuasion bias implies the phenomenon of social influence, whereby one’s influence on group opinions depends not only on accuracy, but also on how well-connected one is in the social network that determines communication. Persuasion bias also implies the phenomenon of unidimensional opinions; that is, individuals’ opinions over a multidimensional set of issues converge to a single “left-right” spectrum. We explore the implications of our model in several natural settings, including political science and marketing, and we obtain a number of novel empirical implications

Topics: HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1162/00335530360698469
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:454
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/454/1... (external link)
  • http://mitpress.mit.edu/QJE (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/454/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1959). A Criterion for Unanimity in French’s Theory of Social Power,”
    2. (1981). A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Reaching a Consensus Using DeGroot’s doi
    3. (1973). Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and doi
    4. (1995). Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign, doi
    5. (1997). Congress; A Political-Economic Theory of Roll Call Voting, doi
    6. (2001). Eigenvector-like Measures of Centrality for Asymmetric Relations,” working paper, doi
    7. (1980). Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: Another Look at Agenda-Setting by the doi
    8. (1992). Low-Involvement Learning: Memory without doi
    9. (1992). Measuring Peer Group Effects: doi
    10. (1992). Microeconomic Analysis,
    11. (1999). Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early Impacts of a Housing Mobility Program,” working paper, doi
    12. (2000). Network Effects and Welfare Cultures,” doi
    13. (2000). Participation and Investment Decisions in a Retirement Plan: The Influence of Colleagues’ doi
    14. (1978). Qualitative Controlled Feedback for Forming Group Judgments and Making Decisions,” doi
    15. (2000). Rational Debate and One-Dimensional Conflict,” doi
    16. (1974). Reaching a Consensus,” doi
    17. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, doi
    18. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study in Human Factors in Housing, doi
    19. (1991). The Company You Keep: The Effects of Family and Neighborhood on Disadvantaged Youths,” NBER working paper. doi
    20. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion,
    21. (2000). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia doi
    22. (1963). The Press and Foreign Policy, doi
    23. (1995). Toward a Procedural Model of Candidate Evaluation,”
    24. (1982). We Can’t Disagree Forever,” doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.