Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A postmodern approach to structured dependency theory

By Gail Wilson


Structured dependency theory has been useful in shifting thinking about status in old age from a negative concentration on individual characteristics to an emphasis on the structural factors which work against elderly people. However, structural dependency theory is itself capable of reinforcing ageist policy and practice. Postmodernism, as an approach to knowledge, moves us on from the premodern when the church was the ultimate authority, through the modern when scientific logic was the touchstone, to the present when there is no ultimate authority for the way the world is perceived. The revolutionary threat to ‘scientific’ research and received wisdom is greatest for the white, middle-class, mid-life, male academic establishment but offers wide possibilities to those who wish to research new fields in new ways. A postmodern approach to ageing research suggests that it would be helpful to concentrate on four themes: the critique of ‘grand theory’; the prioritisation of ‘low’ culture and understanding, as opposed to elite or ‘high’ culture; the recognition of diversity; and the value of personal views and emotions. Since postmodern thought excludes structural relations of power it is unlikely to be used in isolation by gerontologists or social policy analysts

Topics: H Social Sciences (General)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 1997
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0047279497005047
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1989). Ageing, status politics and sociological theory’, doi
    2. (1986). Ageism and social policy’,
    3. (1994). Assembling their own care packages: payment for care by men and women in advanced old age’, doi
    4. (1990). Behavioural Gerontology, doi
    5. (1982). Capitalism and the Construction of Old Age, doi
    6. (1989). Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond,
    7. (1991). Consumer Culture and Postmodernism, doi
    8. (1991). Elder Abuse: An Exploratory Study,
    9. (1993). Food consumption, social roles and personal identity’,
    10. (1994). Institutional reflexivity and modernity’,
    11. (1992). Intimations of Postmodernity, doi
    12. (1980). La Vieillesse et l’Etat, doi
    13. (1991). Models of ageing and their relation to policy formation and service provision’, doi
    14. (1991). Modernity and Self Identity, doi
    15. (1987). Old Age in Modern Society, doi
    16. (1996). Post modernism and social policy: a small step forwards?’, doi
    17. (1992). Post-modernism and the Social Sciences, doi
    18. (1996). Postmodern social policy: a contradiction in terms?’, doi
    19. (1993). Postmodernism and neoliberalism in Latin America’, in The Post Modern Debate in doi
    20. (1994). Postmodernism and social policy: a great leap backwards’, doi
    21. (1996). Postmodernism, welfare and radical politics’, doi
    22. (1992). Regulating Bodies, doi
    23. (1983). Social policy and elderly people in Great Britain: the construction of dependent social and economic status in old age’,
    24. (1992). Social Policy: A Critical Introduction, Polity, doi
    25. (1989). Structured Dependency Theory 349G. Esping-Anderson
    26. (1979). The Aging Enterprise, Jossey-Bass Publishers,
    27. (1982). The Effectiveness of Social Care for the Elderly, doi
    28. (1991). The mask of ageing and the postmodern lifecourse’, doi
    29. (1980). The Policing of Families, doi
    30. (1980). The social creation of poverty and dependency in old age’, doi
    31. (1988). The structured dependency of the elderly: a critical note’, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No.
    32. (1981). The structured dependency of the elderly: the creation of social policy in the twentieth century’, doi
    33. (1987). Theories of the State, doi
    34. (1981). Towards a political economy of old age’, doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.