Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Higher education funding

By Nicholas Barr

Abstract

The expansion of higher education throughout the OECD – and beyond – is both necessary and desirable. But it is costly, and faces competing imperatives for public spending. Higher education finance is therefore salient to an extent that is not yet fully appreciated in all countries, and is also immensely sensitive politically. This paper sets out the core lessons for financing higher education deriving from economic theory and puts them alongside lessons from country experience. The UK reforms announced in 2004 are assessed against the backdrop of those two elements. A concluding section briefly maps out unfinished business

Topics: LB2300 Higher Education, HJ Public Finance
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1093/oxrep
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:288
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/288/1... (external link)
  • http://oxrep.oupjournals.org/ (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/288/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2001a), The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State, London and New York: doi
    2. (1993). Alternative Funding Resources for Higher Education’, Economic Journal, Vol 103, No 418, doi
    3. (2004). An Analysis of the Higher Education Reforms, Briefing note No. 45, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, downloadable from http://www.ifs.org.uk.
    4. (2002). Annual Report: Student Loan Scheme,
    5. (2000). Blund e l l , Richa r d , Deard e n , Lorra i n e , Goodma n , Al iss a and Reed , Howar d
    6. (2003). Calle n d e r , Clai r e , and Wilki n s o n ,
    7. (1998). Co mmo n w e a l t h of Austr a l i a
    8. (1997). Conc e p t u a l Issue s and the Austr a l i a n Exper i e n c e with Incom e Conti n g e n t Charge s for Higher Educat i o n ’ ,
    9. (1997). Conceptual Issues and the Australian Experience with Income Contingent Charges for Higher Education’, doi
    10. (2002). Does Education Matter: Myths about education and economic growth, doi
    11. (2002). Education at a Glance, doi
    12. (2001). Egert o n , Murie l
    13. (2003). Family income and participation in postsecondary education , Stati s t i c s Canad a , Famil y and Labou r Stud i e s Divis i o n , Analy t i c a l Studie s Branch , Rese ar c h Paper No.210 ,
    14. (2003). Family income and participation in postsecondary education,
    15. (2003). Feinst e i n ,
    16. (2003). Financing higher education in the UK: The doi
    17. (2003). for Education and Skills doi
    18. (2002). Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans’, doi
    19. (2002). Funding Higher Education: Policies for Access and Quality’, doi
    20. (2002). Green a w a y
    21. (1991). Income-Contingent Student Loans: An Idea Whose Time Has Come’,
    22. (2004). Investing in Human Capital: A Capital Markets Approach to Student Funding, Cambridge: doi
    23. (1999). Laroc q u e ,
    24. (1998). Learning for Life: Review of Higher Education Financing and Policy: Final Report,
    25. (2004). Lorra i n e , Fitzs i m o n s , Emla, an d Goodma n , Aliss a
    26. (1998). New Zeala n d Minis t ry of Educa t i o n
    27. (2001). New Zeala n d Terti a r y Educa t i o n Advis or y Commi s s i o n
    28. (1989). Nicho l a s
    29. Nicho l a s (2001 a ), The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State, Londo n and New York: Oxfor d Unive r s i t y Press .
    30. (2001). Nicho l a s (ed.)
    31. (1998). Nicho l a s and Crawf o r d , Iain
    32. Nicholas (2004),The Economics of the Welfare State, 4th edition, doi
    33. (2004). Oxford Rev iew of Econo mic Policy,
    34. (2004). Oxford Review of Economic Policy, doi
    35. (2004). Palac i o s Llera s , Migue l
    36. (1996). Repayment Rates for Student Loans: Some Sensitivity Tests, Welfare State Programme, Discussion Paper WSP/127, London: London School of Economics.
    37. (2003). Review of research assessment: Report to the UK funding bodies, Brist o l : High e r Educ a t i o n Fund i ng Coun c i l for Engl a n d . UK Depar t m e n t for Educat i o n and
    38. (2003). Review of research assessment: Report to the UK funding bodies, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
    39. (1989). Student Loans: The Next Steps, doi
    40. (1999). Subs i d i e s , Hiera r c h y and Peers : The Awkwa r d Econo mi c s of Highe r Educ a t i o n ’ ,
    41. (1999). Subsidies, Hierarchy and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education’, doi
    42. Tertiary Education Advisory Commission (2001), Shaping the Funding Framework: Fourth Report of the Tertiary Education Advisory Commission: Summary Report, Tertiary Education Advisory Commission, doi
    43. (2003). The acces s impli c a t i o n s of income co nti n g e n t charg e s for highe r educa t i o n : Lesso n s from Austr a l i a ’ , Aust r a l i a n Natio n a l Unive r s i t y , Centre for Econo m i c Policy Resear c h , Discus s i o n paper no.
    44. (2003). The access implications of income contingent charges for higher education: Lessons from Australia’, Australian National University, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion paper no. doi
    45. (1998). The Dearing Report and the Government’s Response: A Critique’, doi
    46. (1962). The Finan c e of Unive r s i t y Educa t i o n
    47. (1962). The Finance of University Education
    48. (2000). The new UK Quali t y Frame w o r k ’ ,
    49. (2000). The new UK Quality Framework’,
    50. (1955). The Role of Gover n m e n t in Educa t i o n’ ,
    51. (1955). The Role of Government doi
    52. (1992). The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism, doi
    53. (2001). The Wider Benefits of Higher Education, London: Higher Education Funding Council.
    54. (1998). Towards a “Third Way”: Rebalancing the Role of the State’, doi
    55. (2002). UK Educa t i o n and Skill s Selec t Co mmi t t e e
    56. (2003). Who Should Pay? Tuition fees and tertiary education financing in New Zealand, Wellington: Education Forum,

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.