Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Distance, skill deepening and development : will peripheral countries ever get rich?

By Stephen Redding and Peter K Schott


This paper models the relationship between countries' distance from global economic activity, endogenous investments in education and economic development. Firms in remote locations pay greater trade costs on both exports and intermediate imports, reducing the amount of value added left to remunerate domestic factors of production. If skill-intensive sectors have higher trade costs, more pervasive input–output linkages or stronger increasing returns to scale, we show theoretically that remoteness depresses the skill premium and therefore incentives for human capital accumulation. Empirically, we exploit structural relationships from the model to demonstrate that countries with lower market access have lower levels of educational attainment. We also show that the world's most peripheral countries are becoming increasingly economically remote over time

Topics: HB Economic Theory
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00118-4
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1998). A doi
    2. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth’, doi
    3. (1997). Access to Western Markets and Eastern Effort’, doi
    4. (2000). Does Schooling Cause Growth?’, doi
    5. (1996). Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries’, doi
    6. (1997). Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth among New World Economies: a View from Economic Historians of the United States’,
    7. (2002). Falling Trade Costs, Heterogeneous Firms and Industry Dynamics’, Yale School of Management, doi
    8. (2002). Geographical Disadvantage: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Von Thunen Model of International Specialization’, doi
    9. (2000). Geography and Economic Development’, doi
    10. (2001). Geography and International Inequalities: the Impact of New Technologies’,
    11. (1995). Global Income Patterns: Does Geography Play a Role?’, Chapter 2 of Phd Thesis,
    12. (1995). Globalisation and the Inequality of Nations’, doi
    13. (2001). Globalization, Agglomeration, and Wage Premia’, paper presented at CEPR Erwit Conference,
    14. (2001). Gravity with Gravitas: a Solution to the Border Puzzle’, doi
    15. (2001). How Robust is the Home Market Effect?’, mimeograph, London School of Economics.
    16. (2000). Human Capital in Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality Make?’, doi
    17. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’, doi
    18. (2001). Inequality and Growth: The Dual Role of Human Capital in Development’, doi
    19. (2001). Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade’, W o r l dB a n kE c o n o m i cR e v i e w doi
    20. (1990). Integration and the Competitiveness of the Peripheral Industry’,
    21. (1997). Intra-industry Trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach’, doi
    22. (1996). Localization Economies, doi
    23. (2001). Location of Vertically Linked Industries: Agglomeration Versus Comparative Advantage’, doi
    24. (1998). Market Potential, Increasing Returns, and Geographic Concentration’, doi
    25. (1994). Returns to Investment in Education: a Global Update’, World Development, doi
    26. (1998). Shipping Costs, Manufactured Exports, and Economic Growth’, paper presented at the American Economic Association Meetings,
    27. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation’, doi
    28. (1999). The Home Market, Trade, doi
    29. (1999). The Home Market, Trade, and Industrial Structure’, doi
    30. (1996). The Low-skill, Low-quality Trap: Strategic Complementarities between Human doi
    31. (1994). The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-country Data’, doi
    32. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, doi
    33. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade,M I TP r e s s:C a m b r i d g eM A . doi
    34. (1999). Toward a Geography of Trade Costs’, mimeograph, doi
    35. (2002). Trade and Industrial Location with Heterogeneous Labor’, doi
    36. (2002). Why are One third of People Indian and Chinese: Trade, Industrialization and Demography’,
    37. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?’ doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.