Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Optimal life cycle asset allocation : understanding the empirical evidence

By Alexander Michaelides and Francisco J. Gomes

Abstract

We show that a life-cycle model with realistically calibrated uninsurable labor income risk and moderate risk aversion can simultaneously match stock market participation rates and asset allocation decisions conditional on participation. The key ingredients of the model are Epstein–Zin preferences, a fixed stock market entry cost, and moderate heterogeneity in risk aversion. Households with low risk aversion smooth earnings shocks with a small buffer stock of assets, and consequently most of them (optimally) never invest in equities. Therefore, the marginal stockholders are (endogenously) more risk averse, and as a result they do not invest their portfolios fully in stocks

Topics: HG Finance
Publisher: Blackwell
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00749.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:193
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/193/1... (external link)
  • http://www.blackwellpublishing... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/193/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2001). 15It is important to realize that in their tables,
    2. 2002a, Limited asset market participation and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution, doi
    3. 2002b, Towards an explanation of household portfolio choice heterogeneity: nonfinancial income and participation cost Structures, Working paper, doi
    4. (1999). 20The results are qualitatively similar to the ones obtained by Campbell and Viceira
    5. (1993). 2See, for example, Telmer
    6. (1986). 4See, among others, Constantinides
    7. (1996). 9Wemust point out that several papers have contributed to this research. See, for example, Guiso, Jappelli, and Terlizzese
    8. (1998). An equilibrium model with restricted stock market participation, doi
    9. (1999). and Constantinides, Donaldson, and Mehra
    10. (2001). and Yao and Zhang doi
    11. (2001). any convex combination of these two costs is acceptable, for example, a time cost of one (two) day(s) and a monetary cost of $779 ($683). Paiella
    12. (2002). Asset holding and consumption volatility, doi
    13. (1996). Asset pricing in economies with frictions, doi
    14. (2001). Asset pricing with idiosyncratic risk and overlapping generations, Working paper, doi
    15. (1994). Asset pricing with undiversifiable risk and short sales constraints: deepening the equity premium puzzle, doi
    16. (1991). Asset returns with transactions costs and uninsured individual risk, doi
    17. (1993). Asset-pricing puzzles and incomplete markets, doi
    18. (2002). Borrowing costs and the demand for equity over the life cycle, Working paper, doi
    19. (1997). Buffer stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis, doi
    20. (1986). Capital market equilibrium with transaction costs, doi
    21. (1999). Consumption and portfolio decisions when expected returns are time varying, doi
    22. (1998). Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income: a continuous time approach, doi
    23. (2002). Consumption over the life cycle, doi
    24. (1996). Evaluating the effects of incomplete markets on risk sharing and asset pricing, doi
    25. (2000). Heterogeneous labor income and preferences: implications for stock market participation, Working paper,
    26. (1999). Household portfolio allocation over the life cycle, NBER Working paper no. doi
    27. (2002). Household portfolios: an international comparison, doi
    28. (2001). How do household portfolio shares vary with age?, Working Paper,
    29. (1996). Income risk, borrowing constraints and portfolio choice, doi
    30. (2001). Investing retirement wealth: a life cycle model, In John Campbell, and Martin Feldstein, eds: Risk Aspects of Social Security Reform (University of doi
    31. (2002). Junior can’t borrow: a new perspective on the equity premium puzzle, doi
    32. (2002). Life cycle consumption and portfolio choice with additive habit formation preferences and uninsurable labor income risk, Working paper, doi
    33. (1995). Limited market participation and asset pricing, Working paper,
    34. (1995). Market frictions and consumption-based asset pricing, doi
    35. (1997). Market frictions, savings behavior, and portfolio choice, doi
    36. (2001). Occupation-level income shocks and asset returns: their covariance and implications for portfolio choice, Working paper, doi
    37. (2001). Optimal consumption and investment with capital gains taxes, doi
    38. (1995). Optimal consumption and portfolio choices with risky housing and stochastic labor income, Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming. Footnotes 1See, for instance,
    39. (2001). Optimal portfolio choice for long-horizon investors with nontradable labor income, doi
    40. (2002). Owner-occupied housing and the composition of the household portfolio, doi
    41. (2000). Portfolio choice and asset prices: the importance of entrepreneurial risk, doi
    42. (2000). Portfolio choice in the presence of housing, Working Paper, London Business School. doi
    43. (1999). Portfolio choice over the life cycle, Working paper, doi
    44. (2003). Portfolio choice with internal habit formation: a life cycle model with uninsurable labor income risk, doi
    45. (2001). Portfolio choices for home owners, Working paper,
    46. (1997). Precautionary portfolio behavior from a life cycle perspective, doi
    47. (1995). Precautionary saving and social insurance, doi
    48. (1991). Saving and liquidity constraints, doi
    49. (2002). Selling company shares to reluctant employees: France Telecom’s experience, Working paper, HEC and doi
    50. (1999). Social security and institutions for intergenerational, intragenerational and international risk-sharing: a comment, doi
    51. (2003). Stock-market participation, intertemporal substitution and risk aversion, doi
    52. (1989). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework, doi
    53. (1992). The buffer-stock theory of saving: some macroeconomic evidence, doi
    54. (1991). The consumption of stockholders and non-stockholders, doi
    55. (2002). The importance of bequests and life cycle saving in capital accumulation: a new answer, doi
    56. (1998). Transaction costs and asset prices: a dynamic equilibrium model, doi
    57. (2001). Transaction costs and limited stock market participation to reconcile asset prices and consumption choices, IFS Working paper 01/06.
    58. (2003). Wealth accumulation over the life cycle and precautionary savings, doi
    59. (1998). Wealth and portfolio composition: theory and evidence, doi
    60. (2002). Wealth inequality and altruistic bequests, doi
    61. (1999). What level of fixed costs can reconcile consumption and stock returns?, doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.