Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Adversarial Mythologies: Policy Assumptions and Research Evidence in Family Law

By Rosemary Hunter

Abstract

This article contrasts policy advocacy of alternative dispute resolution, and demonization of lawyers and court proceedings in family law, with research evidence that calls those policy positions into question. The research demonstrates, broadly, that restrictions on the availability of publicly funded legal representation do not necessarily lead parties to choose alternative resolution processes, that lawyers are much less adversarial than self–representing litigants, and that lawyer representation and litigation may produce more satisfactory and appropriate outcomes than mediation in some kinds of family disputes. The article argues that legal aid policies should respond to these realities rather than clinging to adversarial mythologie

Topics: K
Publisher: Blackwell
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:1714
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://kar.kent.ac.uk/1714/1/H... (external link)
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.