Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction and much more

By Laurence Goldstein

Abstract

Wittgenstein speaks of the ‘superstitious dread and veneration by mathematicians in face of a contradiction’ and recommends that, instead of adopting this attitude, people might have wanted to produce a contradiction and ‘would be glad to lead their lives in the neighbourhood of a contradiction’ Gödel thought such remarks ‘nonsense’ and few authors have dissented from that verdict. Perhaps the most striking claim Wittgenstein makes (and defends both early and late) is that contradictions are not false. This paper seeks to defend Wittgenstein’s outrageous view, and to show its relevance to solving a variety of logico-semantical paradoxes

Topics: BC
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:1197

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1994). Catch-22. London: Vintage. (First published in 1961.) Kripke, S.
  2. (1999). Circular queue paradoxes — the missing link’. doi
  3. (1999). Clear and Queer Thinking: Wittgenstein’s Development and His Relevance to Modern Thought.
  4. (1988). Labyrinths of Reason.
  5. (1975). Language and the ability to evaluate contradictions and tautologies’, doi
  6. (1961). Notebooks 1914-16.
  7. (1993). Paradox without self-reference’. doi
  8. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. doi
  9. (1989). Philosophy without Ambiguity.
  10. (1999). Recalcitrant variants of the liar paradox’. doi
  11. (1982). Recalcitrant variations of the prediction paradox’. doi
  12. (1978). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. doi
  13. (1986). The development of Wittgenstein’s views on contradiction’. doi
  14. (1998). The import of inclosure’. doi
  15. (1992). This statement is not true’ is not true’. doi
  16. (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi
  17. (2001). Truth-Bearers and the Liar: A Reply to Alan Weir’. doi
  18. (2000). Understanding sentences’. doi
  19. (1999). Understanding Truth. doi
  20. (1999). What is that item designated negation?’, in D.M. Gabbay and H. Wansing (eds) What is Negation?. doi
  21. (1980). Wittgenstein on the Foundations of Mathematics. Cambridge MA: doi
  22. (1999). Wittgenstein’s Ph.D. viva — a re-creation’. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.