Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Democratic Deficit or the Europeanisation of Secession? Explaining the Devolution Referendums in Scotland

By Paolo Dardanelli

Abstract

This article deals with the variation in the demand for self-government in Scotland – as measured by the vote in the two referendums – between 1979, when devolution was rejected, and 1997, when devolution was endorsed. The existing literature mainly deals with each of the two referendums in isolation and does not offer an explicitly comparative analysis of them. However, implicit comparisons contained in analyses of the 1997 referendum tend to identify as the main cause of the variation the 'democratic deficit' created by Conservative rule between 1979 and 1997, which was consistently rejected in Scotland. I take issue with this explanation on theoretical and empirical grounds and advances an alternative account grounded in an explicit comparison of the two referendums. Based on a rationalist approach, the analysis presented here identifies three key elements in the voting dynamics at the two points in time – a gap between support for self-government and the actual vote in the referendum; an interaction effect between attitudes to devolution and to independence; and the role of the European context in shaping perceptions of independence. I argue that significant change in these three variables (rather than a 'democratic deficit') appear to have been the most important determinants of the different results of the two referendums.\u

Topics: J, JN, JZ
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:834

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). A Start to a New Song: the
  2. (2005). Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution. Manchester: doi
  3. (1999). Devolution in the United Kingdom. doi
  4. (1999). Does Civil Society Drive Constitutional Change? The Case of Welsh and Scotland’ in B. Taylor and K. Thomson (eds), Scotland and Wales: Nations Again? Cardiff:
  5. (2002). Elite Division and Voter Confusion: Australia’s Republic Referendum in 1999’, doi
  6. (1996). Institutions and Rationality in Politics – Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalism’, doi
  7. (1999). Introduction and Conclusions’, in B. Taylor and K. Thomson (eds), Scotland and Wales: Nations Again? Cardiff:
  8. (2002). Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums’, doi
  9. (1986). Political Parties and the Referendum on National Sovereignty: the
  10. (1998). Politics and Society in Scotland. Second edition. doi
  11. (1990). Referendum Dynamics and the Irish Divorce Amendment’, doi
  12. (1999). Referendums’ in B. Taylor and K. Thomson (eds), Scotland and Wales: Nations Again? Cardiff:
  13. (2000). Scotland Decides: The Devolution Issue and the doi
  14. (1981). Scottish Election Study
  15. (1999). Scottish Election Survey doi
  16. (1998). Scottish Referendum Study
  17. (1999). Settled Will or Divided Society? Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh Devolution Referendums’, doi
  18. (2001). Sovereignty, Leadership and Voting in the Quebec Referendums’, doi
  19. (1996). Strategies for Self-Government.
  20. (1999). The doi
  21. (2002). The Connection Between European Integration and Demands for Regional Self-Government: A Rational-Institutionalist Comparative Analysis of Scotland,
  22. (1979). The Devolution Referendum of 1979’, Scottish Government Yearbook
  23. (1979). The March 1st Referendum’,
  24. (1981). The Outcome’
  25. (1979). The Scottish and Welsh Devolution Referenda of doi
  26. (1999). The Scottish Political System Revisited’ in B. Taylor and K. Thomson (eds), Scotland and Wales: Nations Again? Cardiff:
  27. (2002). Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh Devolution Referendums: Information, Interests and Opinions’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.