Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Dynamics of power in contemporary media policy-making

By Des (D. J.) Freedman


Despite the growing interest in the organization and regulation of media industries, there is relatively little public discussion of the material processes through which media policy is developed. At a time of considerable change in the global media environment, new actors and new paradigms are emerging that are set to shift the balance of power between public and private interests in the policy-making process. This article focuses on some core challenges to the pluralist conception of public policy-making that still dominates today and considers whether key aspects of UK and American media policy-making can be said to be competitive, accessible, transparent or rational. Based on interviews with a wide range of ‘stakeholders’, the article assesses the power dynamics that underlie media policy-making and argues that the process is skewed by the taken-for-granted domination of market ideology

Publisher: Sage
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). Birt’s BBC Role Burns Out Hope of Independence’, The Guardian (Media suppl.),
  2. (2002). British Politics Today.
  3. (2005). Committee for Freedom of the Press
  4. (2005). Files Show Extent of Murdoch Lobbying’,
  5. (2001). Market-driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest.
  6. (2005). Media and Cultural Policy as Public Policy: The Case of the British Labour Government’, doi
  7. (1987). Media Policy in Britain: Now You See It, Now You Don’t’, doi
  8. (2004). Networks of Influence: The Political Power of the Communications Industry,
  9. (2004). of Appeals for the Third Circuit doi
  10. (1965). Power in Washington: A Critical Look at Today’s Struggle to Govern in the USA. doi
  11. (2005). Public Broadcasting Funding “May Breach EU Rules” ’,
  12. (1990). Sub-governments, Policy Communities and Networks: Refilling the Old Bottles?’, doi
  13. (1997). The Conspicuous Corporation: Business, Public Policy, and Representative Democracy. Ann Arbor: doi
  14. (1979). The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, 2nd edn. doi
  15. (1951). The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. doi
  16. (1965). The Political Process: Executive Bureau–Legislative Commit tee Relations. doi
  17. (1956). The Power Elite. London: doi
  18. (2004). The Problem of the Media. doi
  19. (1973). The State in Capitalist Society. doi
  20. (1962). Two Faces of Power’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.